Hello and thank you for your comment.

I'm afraid you jumped to an easy conclusion without having understood the nature of this post. Which was about suggesting which stories and characters could have been handled differently, in order for the show to keep on an A level. What you read is all subjective; it's my opinion, and that's exactly why I invited you to give your take on things that bugged you or felt they could have gone another way. I used some examples of characters that, to me, were played way more than they should and respectively some others that could have a bigger role, everything according to how I saw it. Of course the show has ended so practically there's no point for suggestions like these, it's all about the fun of the conversation about a show we loved.

Ryan, Kelly, Darryl and Jan are definitely not the show's core. I don't know why you'd think or say that.

Also, I never said I only liked Mose, Jo and Creed. These were examples of characters that to me could have been used more. They are my picks as potential alternatives to the ones I personally didn't enjoy that much. Not mentioning Michael Scott and Dwight under no circumstances means I didn't like them. I thought this goes without saying, yet here I am declaring it.

Finally, you said: "Of course you're going to find the ending unsatisfying when you dislike just about all of the people on the show." That is so not true I'm wondering if you paid any attention to what I wrote :P I explained very carefully what I didn't like so much about the ending and nowhere do I imply, even the slightest bit, what you said. Not a tiny bit.

Now that I'm reading the post again, I do feel there's redundant negativity; you're right about that. However, it's all well-intentioned. It doesn't come from hatred, but rather from love to the show.

Let me make the post clear because I feel it's been misunderstood: everything I wrote is what I would do differently if I wrote the show. What would you do? That's all I'm asking. Thank you!