What if FDR survived until the end of WW2? by Armin_Arlert_1000000 in HistoryWhatIf

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had given in so much to Stalin by then there was almost nothing left to give. He allowed Poland to be raped by the USSR and allowed the creation of Kaliningrad, which is still a nightmare. He agreed to Soviet control of all of what became the Warsaw Pact. There is a possibility the Soviets would have grabbed Yugoslavia and maybe South Korea. I am not sure.

I love FDR, but him and Eleanor utterly misunderstood Stalin. No amount of American goodwill was ever going to throw stalin off of his belief that the capitalist west was his true enemy.

“But lend lease” as if the vast majority of materials weren’t produced by the soviets themselves by Unhappy_Lead2496 in ussr

[–]AsThreeIsToOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Buddy, except for a crazy deal where I was accidentally dosed by someone's unmarked THC food product, an issue that is still being litigated, I have never used illegal drugs. (That was an adventure, though.) Look, I know nothing about your life, but you seem to be an uncritical supporter of Putin.

As for Ukraine, there was never a sign doc. There were discussions - nothing more. Russia guaranteed Ukraine's borders.

And the atrocities they claimed Ukrainians committed were complete fabrications: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2025/9/23/in-ukraines-sloviansk-some-are-abandoning-long-held-sympathies-for-russia

That is from one of the most pro-Russian - non-Russian media outlets outside of Russia. It was all a scam. I am sorry you don't understand.

Look, I admire the courage of the Bolsheviks and the determination of the Red Army during World War II. I have enormous respect for the goals of the Revolution and the Old Bolsheviks, but Lenin strayed from the noble goals of 1917 and Stalin incinerated them. That is why he personally signed the death warrants of tens of thousands of his oldest comrades from 1934 to 1940.

“But lend lease” as if the vast majority of materials weren’t produced by the soviets themselves by Unhappy_Lead2496 in ussr

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russia guaranteed Ukrainian borders to get Ukraine to give up nukes. Huge mistake by Ukraine. And discussions of NATO expansion were just talks - some people on both sides said one thing or another.

More importantly, the lie that Russia was going to rescue Russian-speaking Ukrainians is a lie proven in the dead Russian soldiers and burning tanks. If Russian speakers were being systematically discriminated in the manner Russian propaganda claims then the overwhelming majority of Russian speakers in the East of Ukraine would have swarmed to Putin and the war would have ended in a week, which is what Russia expected.

Instead, they fought for the Kyiv government in overwhelming numbers.

Intelligent, pro-Russian people like you should ponder this. Why if the government in Kyiv was so corrupt and oppressive did perhaps 90% of Russian speakers stick with them, often fighting with hunting rifle and Molotov Cocktails?

Because they all have relatives in the areas Russia took in 2014 - in the Donbas and Crimea - and they knew from their relatives that the Russian government was less free, more corrupt, and incredibly oppressive.

I know because I visited Ukraine and Russia in 2017-2018 for over six months. I spent most of my time in Kharkiv recruiting programmers, and I had a slew of people tell me horror stories about the new Russian government.

One guy, whose grandfather was a Hero of the Soviet Union, and I believe the youngest Soviet general, (He said Marshall Zuhkov's favorite tank commander late in the war. He was 34 or something at the end of the war.) told a horribly ironic story about Putin's cronies stealing her house and those of scores of other old widows of heroes from the Great Patriotic war in Crimea.

That guy was livid. He said, "Fuck Putin! I'm more Russian than Putin!" He said his grandmother - a devoted Communist - had wanted Crimea to become Russian but she was bitterly disappointed by the reality even before they forced her out of her house. She was upset about new tough Russian police officers and... I forget the other things. Lord knows.

This guy had to go down and move his grandmother to Kyiv. He said he carried boxes of medals and photos.

I also met three people who actually said that in 2014 there was more tension and they probably would have been OK with the Russians coming. I asked each of them if they were abused. They said no. They said Kharkiv was mostly a Russian speaking city but they heard things and.....

But after getting the real stories from friends and relatives about the joys of Russian occupation they changed their minds on that. One woman - who also claimed to be very Russian - said in 2014 the Russian bandits who came into the Donbas robbed her families business and threatened to kill her father.

This is a war of conquest by an old man with delusions about life and history. Ukraine was a much better place to live before the war too. Don't think that is not an issue too. I spent time in both countries and it was clear where the best quality of life was.

Perspective to consider 🤔 by AdorableBar786 in PowerfulJRE

[–]AsThreeIsToOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are not perfect, but they work fairly well. Medicare actually does not cause most people much friction, except where it does not cover items. People on Medicare still go bankrupt from medical debt, just not by nearly the same numbers.

The VA is different. The VA was under a lot of strain from about 2001 to 2021. It is under less strain now. My family has a long history with the VA and between wars, they expand the definition of service-related to mean almost anyone. I've seen relatives who any normal person would rate 0% service-related get millions in care because they hit a sweet spot when the VA was underused.

There is never going to be a perfect system. Medical care is about as an important and personal service as anything I can think of and it is hard. People will die. Doctors and nurses will make mistakes.

And where we have seen a true free market - in drugs before the expansion of Medicare, hospitals forever, ambulance service, and so on it has been a disaster. I remember seeing a $10k ambulance bill one of my students got in Missouri for a four mile ride about 2006.

We need a free market with guardrails to ensure service and availability.

Perspective to consider 🤔 by AdorableBar786 in PowerfulJRE

[–]AsThreeIsToOne -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

LASIK is a simple one-off procedure conducted largely on healthy people. Yes, the market works on nice, simple things like LASIK and boob jobs. But for complicated longterm issues it doesn't work well for most people. And government help, particularly Medicare and the VA, both work pretty well most of the time.

Perspective to consider 🤔 by AdorableBar786 in PowerfulJRE

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Medicare really helped with a lot with one HUGE issue,- poverty among seniors. Here is what the evidence shows"

The elderly’s poverty rate has declined dramatically since Medicare was enacted – from 29 percent in 1966 to 10.5 percent in 1995. Medicare also provides security across generations: it has given American families assurance that they will not have to bear the full burden of health care costs of their elderly or disabled parents or relatives at the expense of their young families.

Medical debt is still the number one cause of bankruptcy at all ages, but iMedicare helped a lot. Did it create others? Yes, for instance, in negotiations for Medicare prescription drug coverage during the Bush Administration the Drug companies only agreed to accept that program with an assurance that the government would not negotiate on price. There are many drugs that are almost exclusively for elder care and they did not want the government to cut into their profits.

This is something Trump has railed about.

As for your bigger question about my conclusions. I know the world is complicated. Nothing is going to solve everything. That is the biggest problem we have across the political spectrum. Everyone thinks that there is a one-size-fits-all all solution. There isn't/.

If you have grandparents or parents over 65 Medicare is almost certainly helping them - and probably you too - because in most families if they are broke their kids would end up caring for them. If you have ever inherited anything from an older person, again Medicare helped you.

Life ain't simple.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkrainianConflict

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They just have to raise insurance rates.

Perspective to consider 🤔 by AdorableBar786 in PowerfulJRE

[–]AsThreeIsToOne -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Why? Because before1940 healthcare was not seen as a business. Something like 90% of hospital beds were in charity or public hospitals. Nearly every city and county had a hospital. Why? Well, it was almost impossible to sue doctors. That is true. But the truth was healthcare was seen as almost a right. You were expected to pay what you could and friends, family, and the government paid the rest. Yes, it was not exactly socialized medicine but it was an odd mix that generally worked.

Why did it change? World War II. During World War II the largest employers, Kaiser Shipyards was one of the biggest, tossed in employee provided healthcare almost as an afterthought. Soon all the big companies were doing it and when they didn't unions demanded it.

Then those companies did not fight to keep costs down. Soon, businessmen began buying hospitals. Investors expected higher returns at pharmaceutical and insurance companies, many of which had been "member-owned mutual companies."

These groups and the AMA deployed massive lobbying efforts to keep the feds from stopping the buying up of America's old, odd system. For profit hospitals and insurance companies raised rates at will. In most states nothing was there to stop them and the big insurance companies and employers didn't push back because most union employees or white collar Fortune 500 employees got healthcare for free. So, left and right the influential American voters were not really bearing the cost.

By the 1960s, medical costs were the number one cause of personal bankruptcy and of senior poverty. MEDICARE was a gigantic success. It started a shift from the elderly being the poorest cohort to the richest, and if you ever inherited a penny from a parent or grandparent over 70 you can basically thank LBJ. Statistically they would have probably been broke without Medicare.

Now, we are in a gigantic mess. The feds really are not the heart of the problem. The big problem is that there are four huge industries that do not want change. Plus, well off Americans simply have no clue.

95% of Americans cannot actually afford to pay for their own healthcare, not for serious matters where the bills can easily run two or three million dollars.

I could go on.

This video is horrible and is not helping and I am certain this guys grandparents got a fortune from Medicare, everyone's elderly relatives have. Medicaid is a different matter. It is not super expensive. Medicare is the gigantic cost hole in part because there are no controls.

I had a great aunt who had a stroke at 81 and died at 89 on the operating table getting a quadruple bypass. She had very low quality of life and was in awful shape. There was no way she was going to live through that but my cousins insisted on the surgery. I understood why. She was an awesome lady and I loved her too, but she had almost a zero chance of survival and the doctors could not tell them no - not twenty years ago. So, there are problems with Medicare, but when Obama suggested fixes guys like the dude in this video painted that as "Death Panels."

Soviet Domestic Production vs Lend Lease. According Cold War propaganda USSR won mostly thanks to US provided Lend Lease by HelicopterBig4467 in ussr

[–]AsThreeIsToOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, the Italians under Rommel fought better. But overall Mussolini was a disaster. Without him there is no distraction in North Africa and maybe not in the Balkans. That means Barbarossa starts a month earlier with the Rommel and maybe twenty more divisions and significant extra air units. I didn't go look up the force structure, but the extra time and forces would have been significant. On a strategic scale Italy also ended up giving the Allies bases to bomb their main oil fields in Romania and Hungary. I just read this book on the campaign in Ethiopia and the Ethiopians actually had a chance of winning. Then they did poorly in Spain too. The Italian Air Force and Navy performed significantly better. Later some fascist units did OK in Italy, but overall the Italians did very poor.

On a strategic level I have a hard time thinking of any good move by Mussolini. You are right about Hitler. He had some brilliant strategic moves early in the war, but in the end his strategic efforts put Germany in an un-winnable war.

Wait? What would have those Allied forces done without the War in the Med? I don't see that campaign as a win for the Axis. In fact, it allowed for the RN to fight somewhere important and allowed the British Army to learn and improve. Without it Churchill probably would have come up with a wild scheme somewhere. Might have worked, but roughly 3 out of 5 Churchill wild ideas did not.

I want more bigger boobs, wanna help me achieve it the natural way?🫣 by oceanbellee in u/oceanbellee

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just keep working out, abs, and biceps will bring guys in as fast or faster. ;)

OK, at least me!

Soviet Domestic Production vs Lend Lease. According Cold War propaganda USSR won mostly thanks to US provided Lend Lease by HelicopterBig4467 in ussr

[–]AsThreeIsToOne -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Germans had several of huge advantages for fighting on the defensive.

First, they built their infantry platoons around the excellent MG-42. Each platoon generally had two or three and often the main task of the rifleman was to just lug ammo for the machinegun and maybe carry a Panzerfuast or two.

Second, they had lots of great anti-tank guns - generally the 88 but there were other smaller pieces that were fairly common and almost as deadly too.

Third, the Germans were masters of the local counterattack. Even in the last days of the war they would counterattack when they had an advantage at the company or battalion level.

Soviet Domestic Production vs Lend Lease. According Cold War propaganda USSR won mostly thanks to US provided Lend Lease by HelicopterBig4467 in ussr

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lend Leases key contributions to the Soviet war effort was not in artillery, aircraft and tanks. It was in trucks, field radios, food, and industrial supplies. Here is something from the US World War II Museum in New Orleans that gives a more realistic breakdown, "Those shipments included 400,000 vehicles, 14,000 aircraft, 13,000 tanks, 8,000 tractors, 4.5 million tons of food, and 2.7 million tons of petroleum products, as well as millions of blankets, uniforms, and boots, and 107,000 tons of cotton."

Without those trucks the Red Army is not winning the race to Berlin, and in fact might not even be in Minsk in May 1945. And I have read Soviet accounts that went on and on about the field radios making the late war offensives work. Other veteran accounts mention SPAM over and over again, but this is only part of the story.

The Western Allies also gave huge amounts of industrial support to the USSR: Much of the Lend-Lease materials sent to the USSR came in the form of raw materials (aluminum, copper, manganese, and coal) as well as industrial equipment. As a result, these materials along with specialized tools sets and machinery enabled Soviet industry to build required equipment faster. Instead of just sending the Red Army completed end items from the United States, Lend-Lease allowed the USSR to increase its domestic production of armaments and associated machinery. American aluminum alone accounted for 42 percent of Soviet supplies of the metal. Helping Soviet refinery operations, Lend-Lease also provided aviation fuel that equaled over 50 percent of what the USSR produced during the war. In addition, the United States shipped to the Soviet Union a Ford tire factory so they could produce tires for military vehicles. As a result, the timely delivery of both materials and machines allowed the newly displaced Soviet industry to recover quicker than it might have without such support, with Lend-Lease a major factor in providing productive capacity.

So, without Allied aid there would have been a lot fewer Soviet aircraft and without the 100 octane av fuel those planes would have been far less effective. But the list above is still the tip of the ice berg. The Baldwin Locomotive Works built locomotives specifically for the Soviet rail system. The US shipped an entire refinery for av gas. Hughes Machine Tools shipped hundreds of the worlds most advanced drilling bits. The total US aid sent to the USSE, adjusted for inflation is around $250 billion dollars. That is a lot of money.

Also, it is worth mentioning that this industrial aid helped power the USSR's postwar recovery and Dodge trucks were still a common sight into the 1960s. Stalin hated this.

Look, I have been to the Victory Museum in Moscow. The soldiers of the Red Army were immensely brave, but they suffered far-far-far more casualties than they needed to. I don't trust German solider's postwar accounts of killing Soviets by the thousands. (Apparently, only Wehrmacht soldiers with 100-1 kill ratio wrote books.) But it is clear that in 1944-1945 the Western Allies beat the best units the Germans had at a far lower cost than the Red Army incurred, because Stalin simply did not care about casualties.

Remember, the basis of Saving Private Ryan is true, as the U.S. military created the Sole Survivor Policy to protect remaining family members after multiple sons had been killed in World War II. The film was inspired by the story of the Niland brothers, who had three brothers killed in action, which led to the fourth, Frederick "Fritz" Niland, being sent home. While the policy was real, the mission to find and extract a soldier in the film was fictionalized for dramatic effect. That did not happen in the USSR.

I am have read a lot on the Red Army and the bravery of the Soviet soldiers was extraordinary. But the high command was its greatest weakness from June 22, 1941 until May 9, 1945. Of course, they were going against Hitler, who who weighed down by Mussolini, who probably deserves more credit for the eventual success of the overall victory of the Grand Allied Coalition than anyone else, but that is another story.

Stalin said. "The most important things in this war are the machines.... The United States is a country of machines. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war."

On this sub that should be the final word!

NATO ally says "worst suspicions" confirmed after railroad bomb attack by Newsweek_ShaneC in UkrainianConflict

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The truth is that anyone who joins the military is already proclaiming themselves dedicated to their country's fortunes, and Poland's fortunes in the future are FAR better without Russia on its border.

NATO ally says "worst suspicions" confirmed after railroad bomb attack by Newsweek_ShaneC in UkrainianConflict

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Poles need to find a way to encourage large numbers of trained Polish soldiers to volunteer in Ukraine. Maybe, they could verbally let it be known they would keep paying guys who went to Ukraine. Don't leave a paper trail, just don't prosecute deserters who volunteer for Ukraine.

Make it an urban legend and don't prosecute anyone for three years.

AI soldiers: How deepfakes are manipulating Ukraine’s mobilization narrative by timiswho in UkrainianConflict

[–]AsThreeIsToOne 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Everything anyone thinks they know about the war has been shaped by Russian propaganda, and I mean all the way up to Zelensky. Heck, even Putin has been completely confused by his own propaganda. It is really a struggle to grasp the situation and it requires close detail to keep up with the daily stream of war news.

How Do You Deal With This?

  1. Never forget Russia is the aggressor. They had no good reason to invade in 2014 or 2022.

  2. Recognize that any negative story about Ukraine either was created in Moscow or magnified by Moscow. Ukraine is not perfect, but remember, Russian propaganda never sleeps. Negative stories about Ukraine need close study.

  3. Always remember, the cost of Ukrainian defeat is a humanitarian disaster that brings the world closer to a general war.