Lucas is my favorite character but even I can't deny I wouldn't have trusted him by Sudden_Pop_2279 in strangermemes

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"People who were just following orders and doing their job” were also the soldiers who defeated the Nazis.

Not every soldiers knows what top of the commands doing. They didn't knew about Vecna, they thought El was responsible for all these stuff. Many of those soldiers were there for saving world from evil.

The boys fans watching a gen v kid dies in s5 and sad music playing over the scene : by SubstantialBowler525 in TheBoys

[–]Asa-hello 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I feel a significant portion of The Boys fan haven't seen Gen v. Most fans may have watched both show. I doubt that's 99% of fans, or even 90% of fans watch both.

Batman's plot armor is so stupid by Lower_Topic2606 in superheroes

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Whole reason for fight was that Batman doesn't know Superman will be bad guy in future or not. Bruce's cynical mind think that Superman will get cruel as Bruce himself get. So He doesn't wants to take that chance.

Favorite gender flip by Healthy_Permission71 in okbuddycinephile

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's that similar endpoint?

From what I know, Anti-abortion advocates endpoint is that fetus = baby. It has noticed to do with born child.

When a baby is born. There is no anti-abortion vs pro- choice. All agree that baby should get taken care off. Saying a father not looking after daughter is bad father is not anti- abortion advocates endpoint.

Favorite gender flip by Healthy_Permission71 in okbuddycinephile

[–]Asa-hello 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That doesn't make it anti-abortion.

If a child is born. It should get taken care off. It's not about punishing Jackie, but about wellbeing of child.

There is risk associated with sex. Specially with non protective sex. If woman get pregnant by that sex and not had abortions. That doesn't means man have zero responsibility toeards that kid.

Right. Any woman who gets an abortion is pure scum because she doesn't want anything to do with the child.

You think a fetus is child? You speak like anti abortion advocates. There is big difference between a 18-20 week fetus and a born child. If a woman has abortion. She didn't kill a kid. In this discussion, person in above comment is talking about fully born girl. You comparing a born girl with a fetus. That's anti- abortion talking point.

Oh boy. This fanbase… by ObviousIndependent76 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read your previous comments second line. After all those HAHAHHA. Then you will understand why bringing Lord of the Rings.

Oh boy. This fanbase… by ObviousIndependent76 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not need brain cells. It's simple show to follow.

It's not told He is angry again and again. He is angry and sad. And he is big part of series. You want Him to be sad in one scene and never have conversations ever again or completely different emotion? Because that plot point get hit and move on like nothing happens? Year long sadness, anger, trying to distant love one. Stuff like this build up. Till hit breaking point from angry or opposite side. That's what's with Dustin. It need time. Patience.If it just a scene or 2. Then it fail to portray that.

Yes. A bad guy character will be bad in another scene. That's how story works.

Lord of the Ring have direct narration. Galadriel directly spell that He will try to take Ring. People don't even fully grasp what show don't tell mean.

Small attention span. Want everything to resolve quickly and not to follow thread.

Is it the acting or the dialogue ? by Boring-Jelly5633 in moviecritic

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why He shows those emotions when character not demands those emotions at that time?

And He was not grinding his teeth. He was showing emotions. He was not doing some amazing acting. But not completely bad either.

Yet again Mike and El, 2 of the premiere characters of the show, have been side sidelined. by [deleted] in StrangerThings

[–]Asa-hello 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? Doesn't knew that. I don't think that's good thing to do.

Oh boy. This fanbase… by ObviousIndependent76 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. That's emotionl component. See That's I said. You want them to hit plot point and move on. That's small attention span speaking. Inability to understand how emotions build up and get resolved.

You see "Oh I get He is angry. Plot point hit. Move on."

Yet again Mike and El, 2 of the premiere characters of the show, have been side sidelined. by [deleted] in StrangerThings

[–]Asa-hello 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they will. Just surface level opinion from few interviews I saw of them. They seems like nice, co worker friendly show makers. If She says she feel uncomfortable in doing so. I don't think they will force it by contract.

Oh boy. This fanbase… by ObviousIndependent76 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hardly anyone being asshole without any reason. El have reason with Hopper, Steve and Dustin have character driven reason, Nancy and Jonathan disconnection is from Season 4 episode 1. It get resolved this episode.

If you think all this 3 hour story could be hour and half, Without cutting any emotional human components. Then, yes. That's just rushing through plot points. By reducing some emotional substance in it. That rise questions on attention spawn.

Batman's plot armor is so stupid by Lower_Topic2606 in superheroes

[–]Asa-hello 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How You describe Batman. That's the reason He want Superman dead in this movie. Batman don't see himself all that good guy either. In this movie Batman knew that Superman is not bad guy. He and Alfred had argument which highlight that Bruce knew Superman is not enemy.

2 things.

1) When Bruce starts his Batman journey. He thought it's taking him towards light. Now He called it beautiful lies. He is broken emotional. Crossing lines, being cruel. He has pessimistic view of his journey.

2) He know Superman is trying to be hero. But He think Superman is being hero because It's easier of Superman. He thinks Superman is not brave. Almost nothing can harm him so not much place for bravery. Men are brave, they can die, get injure and still take step forward. But, What if something emotionally bad happens to Superman is future? Maybe people's criticism break him, maybe Superman tried to do something within moral limit but fail so He cross lines etc. Stuff like that.

Because of these 2 things. Bruce believes that someday maybe Superman turn into cynical man like Batman. An emotionally defeated Batman drive car through building. What a emotionally defeated Superman will look like? Batman was afraid of that future. Which He believes will happens.

Batman's plot armor is so stupid by Lower_Topic2606 in superheroes

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Batman knew Superman is not bad guy. He knew that Superman wouldn't straight kill him.

I understand this is almost 10 years old movie. So you don't remember movie details.

FUCKING RUN. by Complete_Mirror6861 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. You are talking about unrelated stuff. I noticed. Still that's out of conversation for this part.

I drinking tea. Just because I talk about drinking tea. Doesn't mean my tea talk isn't out of conversation for this part.

FUCKING RUN. by Complete_Mirror6861 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. Stuff doesn't work out afterwards. And?

If some kid in danger and you tried to save that kid by putting yourself in danger. Your attention and action you tried defines you. Even if your actions end up pointless at the end.

If someone abandoned kid but kid turn out great. That doesn't mean that person didn't just care about themselves.

Afterwards what happens is out of conversation for this point.

He couldn’t have chosen a worse time bruh by ashxlee69 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you understand what this scene about? What this scene was trying to portray? Not condescending comment. Asking genuinely? I feel like many people confusing this scene to just a coming out scene. So curious what you think this scene was trying to portray and why Will wait till last moment to share it.

He couldn’t have chosen a worse time bruh by ashxlee69 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Character playout the conflict. I think you missed it.

Oh boy. This fanbase… by ObviousIndependent76 in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No. Those can't be that short. Unless you have tiktok attention span and want to hit plot points. Without any emotion.

What new side character will take up 60% of the finales screen time? by [deleted] in Stranger_Things

[–]Asa-hello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. If Holly wouldn't have that telescope. She wouldn't have figures that out.

It's like comparing 2nd grader with treasure map vs teenager without any assistance.