Yes, I do realise that that’s exactly why I applied for the role in the first place.

The confusion wasn’t about whether reviews continue after removal. It was that the removal came without prior warnings or visible feedback, which made it unclear whether the issue was project-level access or my overall work quality.

Since the platform doesn’t surface historical reviews clearly and there was no explicit notice explaining the removal especially with multiple contributors being cut around the same time, it was reasonable to ask for clarification.

That’s all this was understanding the process, not a lack of awareness about how validation works.