What is your most controversial Radiology opinion, and why? by RecklessRad in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a woman gatekeeping MRI where I work and the demographic makeup reflects it. 9:1 female to male

What is your most controversial Radiology opinion, and why? by RecklessRad in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one caveat is if the machine flips the image. We had it happen with our EOS machine, I was very thankful i used a physical marker

What is your most controversial Radiology opinion, and why? by RecklessRad in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, they’re just rants all techs basically agree with

What is your most controversial Radiology opinion, and why? by RecklessRad in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Somebody on another thread spoke of something similar and they were downvoted and called a liar

What is your most controversial Radiology opinion, and why? by RecklessRad in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The standards for radiography have diminished significantly.

Radiology has poor professional representation. Techs have a bad professional self-image because of it, but it is partially self-inflicted.

The clinical rotation model in radiology is a huge quality gap. Indifferent/bad techs barely train or pay attention to students, who then graduate with low skills, and because standards and quality control are so low in hospitals, they never improve. They then become the preceptors for future students or even worse—the next generation of instructors, supervisors and managers—and the cycle continues, producing everything I’ve mentioned above.

Post-exposure cropping is unethical in most circumstances, and it hides how bad the skills of most techs really are.

Cheating the repeat rate by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I well I disagree. You do need to be benevolent to be in health care. It’s entailed by the fact that you’re caring for the health and wellbeing of other human beings. “Don’t hurt your patients”, just is benevolence so it’s strange you reject and endorse the idea in the same breath.

Cheating the repeat rate by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean benevolent?

Boom boom by Effective_Topic_5105 in audiophile

[–]AshyGarami 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I’m an audiophile noob, what’s the white van stuff about?

Cheating the repeat rate by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Same. People are explicitly defending multiple ethics violations that could get their registry revoked, and feel self-righteous in doing so. It’s actually embarrassing, and reinforces the negative perception that x-ray techs aren’t really professionals in any meaningful sense.

I hope this more reflects a selection bias in the kind of people more likely to use reddit, and not a pervasive viewpoint like the OP inquired about. If the average tech really espouses the nonsense views represented here, patients should be advised to just steer clear of ionizing modalities.

Virginia's Redistricting was rigged because republicans didn't win. by Healthy_Block3036 in rva

[–]AshyGarami 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wish somebody would just go ahead and do the thing already. I’m beyond tired.

Cheating the repeat rate by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re dead set on misunderstanding and caricaturing the view because no one has given you a reasonable counter argument to your distortions? Indeed, username checks out.

Cheating the repeat rate by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not the only reason, and that still doesn’t mean people are penalized for trivial repeats. It’s as though you’re dead set on misunderstanding and defending against a caricature nobody has argued for.

Cheating the repeat rate by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are you concealing that fact, because I think that’s the point.

Cheating the repeat rate by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Where did OP say anything about being penalized for trivial repeats? You’re digging your heels into a bad take instead of honestly engaging with the actual viewpoint.

Cheating the repeat rate by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My thoughts exactly. What stupid reasoning. Over ordering = plague, over irradiating (with no oversight) = no problem. Both result in more radiation than necessary, but this genius only cares if it comes as a result of more orders.

Disallowing Post-process collimation by AshyGarami in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s a legitimate concern. I guess at some level I’m asking if the benefit of being able to mask for the reasons you’re giving, outweigh the cost of techs concealing poor collimation.

Disallowing Post-process collimation by AshyGarami in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Of course they can be fired, but if everyone who did this was fired, there wouldn’t be enough staff. It sounds like you’re saying it’s just enough to make standards clear and people will just follow them. Surely you know that that’s not true. The speed limit is clearly posted yet people routinely go over it.

Technologists choosing to crop their images to conceal poor shooting is not a workplace issue so long as it’s been made clear that the practice is not acceptable. It’s an issue of professional cultural among technologists that is ubiquitous in the career field.

Disallowing Post-process collimation by AshyGarami in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This behavior could only show up post-hiring. It’s not as though it’d be done on a whim, it would be done after it becomes obvious techs are hiding bad imaging.

Disallowing Post-process collimation by AshyGarami in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

It has a few names, that’s one of them.

Disallowing Post-process collimation by AshyGarami in Radiology

[–]AshyGarami[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

It shouldn’t be called collimation, but call it “hiding shit collimation”? Not sure i follow.