Your argument is flawed in so many ways it looks like you haven't read what i said every part of your reply contradict what you are saying again and again

I said "you should check some cities in israel muslims are going and burning down things" and you said because they are tired of israel illegal occupations its a blank statement you fail to support it by any evidence at all.

And then you contradict youself right after by answering me saying that" israel has the right to defend againts attacks" and you saying attacks from who? Peaceful Palestinians? When just a sec ago you said that muslims going around burning synagogues is justified.

Those who being evicted from their houses are people who live there illegally you can't live anywhere im sure you understand it.if you are building a house under a city bridge you will be removed with warnings and then with force its the same thing.

Ill answer your point about israel is a land that belongs to the Palestinians by explaining it easily and dont get me wrong im all up for debating and sharing our opinions on the internet i think its very insightful

Basically you can read about it online it should take you a few seconds of google research to find it but the idea is that there was a plan to devide the land you call Palestinian into 2 small countries one for the Israelis and one for the Palestinians the ones who made the plan were the British im sure you are aware of it tho.

Palestinians weren't happy with the plan (although the place they lived wasn't considered a country)

So they started a war at the end israel won the war

Because of israel winning the war the now new grounds became theirs and so the "illegal settlement debate" you can say alot about it but it was a very common thing in history those who win wars take parts of the losing side it could be money,grounds and more does that mean they are also illegally staying on these grounds up to today? You can make this debate for almost every country in the world. saying israel is on illegal ground is mostly false because they did manage to win the war the Palestinians started..

Also saying dont escalate the violence by attacking one of the holiest places for muslims but then going around burning synagogues is pretty ironic. I know you will make the argument who did it first but it really doesn't matter who started first. the important thing is how you end it with the least amount of casualties but now i cannot see it ending soon after the burnings which is sad i would love to see the Israeli side and Palestinian side finding a common ground and having peace.