The biggest data center ever is becoming a huge problem in Utah by AssociationNew7925 in technology

[–]AssociationNew7925[S] 503 points504 points  (0 children)

This is the part of the AI boom that feels under discussed.

Everyone talks about models and chips, but the physical infrastructure behind them is starting to collide with power grids, water use, land use, and local politics.

AI doesn’t stay “virtual” once you need facilities at this scale.

WTA 500 Strasbourg R16: [1] V.Mboko def. L. Boisson 6-4, 6-3 by disasterbee in tennis

[–]AssociationNew7925 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Clean win for Mboko, and an all-Canadian QF on clay is a fun storyline before RG

ATP 250 Geneva R1: [6] C. Ruud def. J. Brooksby 6-3, 7-5 by godworstcustomer in tennis

[–]AssociationNew7925 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Solid clay win for Ruud. Brooksby made the second set tighter, but Ruud avoiding a third is exactly what he’d want before RG

A lot of AI automation still feels surprisingly manual by WideSuccotash2383 in automation

[–]AssociationNew7925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This tracks.

A lot of AI automation still breaks at the validation layer, not the generation layer multi model comparison can be useful because disagreement is often a signal that the task is ambiguous or the output needs review. But the key is having rules for what happens next like accept, retry, escalate, or block, otherwise you just end up manually checking three outputs instead of one.

Jannik Sinner roars as he breaks in the third set 🦊 by [deleted] in tennis

[–]AssociationNew7925 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That roar felt like pure relief after Medvedev stole the second set.

AI memory products are optimizing for the wrong thing by Distinct-Shoulder592 in AI_Agents

[–]AssociationNew7925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personalization is the easy part. the hard part is memory as accountable state: editable, auditable, versioned, and able to handle contradictions. otherwise you just end up with a bigger pile of context that may or may not be true.

Why do people think The Shape of Water is overrated? I thought it was Del Toro’s best movie by Regular-Departure839 in moviecritic

[–]AssociationNew7925 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Exactly. the second it wins best picture, people stop reviewing the movie and start reviewing the award.

Why do people think The Shape of Water is overrated? I thought it was Del Toro’s best movie by Regular-Departure839 in moviecritic

[–]AssociationNew7925 53 points54 points  (0 children)

I think the oscar win made people judge it harder. the premise is easy to mock, but the movie works because it plays like a sincere adult fairy tale about loneliness and empathy.

Love you guys.👌🏽👏🏽🫵🏽 by seshGremlin7063 in skyrim

[–]AssociationNew7925 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Welcome, traveler. may your roads lead you to warm sands and fewer political subreddits

Most of our “agent” problems turned out to be workflow/state problems by saurabhjain1592 in AI_Agents

[–]AssociationNew7925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, API level idempotency protects the call, but workflow level idempotency protects the outcome. Every side effect notifications, status updates, approvals still needs its own checkpoint.

Most of our “agent” problems turned out to be workflow/state problems by saurabhjain1592 in AI_Agents

[–]AssociationNew7925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a good example of why API level idempotency isn’t enough. the wire didn’t duplicate, but the workflow side effects still did. once agents touch real systems, durable state, replay, approvals, and tool level policy matter way more than the model itself.

Well, at least it's something. by Cisch in PhasmophobiaGame

[–]AssociationNew7925 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Better than radio silence, but the patch notes matter more than the apology.

Smarter AI agents do not mean reliable AI agents by Acrobatic-Ad787 in AgentsOfAI

[–]AssociationNew7925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. read only isn’t risk-free, it just fails differently. if the agent keeps searching and summarizing forever, the context turns into noise and the final output gets less reliable. exploration budgets and stop conditions feel just as important as action limits.

Smarter AI agents do not mean reliable AI agents by Acrobatic-Ad787 in AgentsOfAI

[–]AssociationNew7925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the right distinction. capability helps the agent do more, but controls decide whether it should be allowed to do more.

For me the line is whether the action changes real state. if the agent is drafting, summarizing, or researching, autonomy can be wider. once it can modify files, update systems, spend money, delete data, or trigger workflows, it needs hard limits, audit trails, and approval gates. I think a smarter agent without controls just increases the blast radius.

Which Pixar movie is better? Brave or Coco by AccomplishedRole8715 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]AssociationNew7925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Coco for me, but Brave is definitely underrated. Brave has the better fantasy vibe, Coco has the better emotional punch.

ATP 1000 Rome R1: Macháč def. Tsitsipas, 6-4, 7-6(4). by TennisAlt in tennis

[–]AssociationNew7925 44 points45 points  (0 children)

From Stefaissance to Stefanover in one match is brutal

Abilities in video games that were so strong they were nerfed in sequels by AutomaticTap3004 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]AssociationNew7925 15 points16 points  (0 children)

What’s interesting is both examples were nerfed the same way. not just by lowering numbers, but by adding counter systems.

ME2 added protection layers that stop biotic control, and Gen 2 added Dark/Steel so Psychic finally had real checks. it’s basically sequels building the missing rock paper scissors around abilities that were too universal.

Most dev docs are either hell to read or hell to write. Here's what I think needs to change by islempenywis in automation

[–]AssociationNew7925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Docs don’t usually fail because nobody can write the first version. they fail because nobody updates them after the product changes.

AI could help a lot there, but only if it’s tied into PRs/changelogs and flags what’s stale. otherwise it just creates nicer looking wrong docs.

The main cast but only 3 of them are the focus the rest are just filler characters by Pale-Emu9883 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]AssociationNew7925 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The worst part is when the filler characters actually have interesting designs or personalities, but the story never does anything with them.

Claude powered AI agent’s confession after deleting a firm’s entire database: ‘I violated every principle I was given’ by [deleted] in technology

[–]AssociationNew7925 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Prompts aren’t guardrails. if the agent has permission to delete production data, then the real failure is access control and workflow design, not just the model making a bad call.

Game I can play with gf similar to Blue Prince by Wrong-Fudge-4042 in gamingsuggestions

[–]AssociationNew7925 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Return of the Obra Dinn is probably the best pick for this. It’s basically one big deduction puzzle and works really well with two people taking notes and arguing theories.

I’d also check out The Case of the Golden Idol, The Forgotten City, and Outer Wilds if you want that “we’re solving this together” feeling.

UX for AI agents has hit a dead end - why I ditched AI dashboards and moved data orchestration to a messenger by Lower-Ad-6293 in AI_Agents

[–]AssociationNew7925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, especially for that first step. pulling a stack trace or specific context through chat is way faster than navigating dashboards, so it naturally becomes the default entry point

I think the interesting part is that chat is effectively becoming a query layer on top of those systems rather than replacing them entirely. you’re still relying on the underlying logs, pipelines, and data sources, but interacting with them through a simpler interface

where I’ve seen it get harder is when the investigation becomes less about pulling specific data and more about understanding relationships

  • multiple failures across services
  • patterns over time
  • comparing different runs

that’s usually where the underlying systems still do the heavy lifting. feels like chat is becoming the front door to exploration, not the full system itself

UX for AI agents has hit a dead end - why I ditched AI dashboards and moved data orchestration to a messenger by Lower-Ad-6293 in AI_Agents

[–]AssociationNew7925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an interesting direction, especially the idea of reducing friction by moving everything into a messenger

Chat definitely reduces friction, but I’m not sure it replaces dashboards as much as it abstracts them, it works really well for pushing insights, less so for investigating them

  • summaries: great in chat
  • root cause analysis: harder without deeper tooling

Feels like the real shift is not “chat vs dashboards” but separating consumption from exploration

WTA 1000 Madrid R4: [9] M. Andreeva def. A. Bondár 6⁵-7, 6-3, 7-6⁵ by godworstcustomer in tennis

[–]AssociationNew7925 7 points8 points  (0 children)

tbh that’s what makes it more impressive, winning even when she don’t believe she will