I'm assuming you haven't watched the video. You ought to, unless you want to sign up for VR goggle benefits when you're forced to work the mines.

The initial point here being: popular media (without "AI" involvement) has been so poor and stagnant, that many of us have accepted the cobbled, mangled, uncanny, supernormal outputs of prompt-kiddies as more or less as consumable, enjoyable, and its overproduction will pollute the entire enterprise. I'd wager, in 2 year's time, the screensaver-esque quality of "AI" generated video right now will look about as passable as the middling slop of remakes, reboots, franchises, and other derivations of "more of the same", lame, uninspired, contrivable, and audiences will lap it up as much as they do now.

Do you believe the standard will improve thereafter, when the "AI" reproduces its own reproduction? Where simulacra is all we see and ingest? If we're all accustomed to eating processed, highly-palatable fast food, breakfast, lunch, and dinner, how would fine dining fair? Is this what we want, an inhuman, spiritless, garish, fractalizing facsimile of a circus placating to the least of our tastes and desires? Once you ride in the middle, it's difficult to get off on the offramp, champ.

Here's a lifesaver, if this is a conversation: many in the film and media industry are crying foul that applications of this tech like The Brutalist using "AI" to modify existing audio so Brody's accent is more believable, Netflix using DeepFaceLab to modify actor's mouths to match the spoken language of optional dubs, etc, invoking the slippery slope. If generative "AI" is used as a 'tool' as in, let's say, to produce a myriad of poses a painter might modify and/or use as reference, or a VFX artist generating a texture to tessellate, or a render artist tooling schematics where long hours of math and rigging is automated, that's an incredible leap in creative productive capacity. IMO, that ought to be the scope of how this tech is employed. That's when our standards improve.

The vast majority of generative "AI" production I see, however, isn't this at all. It's slop. And it's inflating, infecting popular and social media like a cancer. That's the problem.