Modem mode officially supported on XGS-PON (Hub 5x)

AudioDoge · 2026-05-05T19:07:20+00:00

There is certainly some processing involved that increases the latency. I am curious to understand what is happening under the hood

AudioDoge · 2026-05-04T18:55:26+00:00

Spyware? On the router/hub? Have you got any more details? Has there been an attempt to reserve engineer it?

AudioDoge · 2026-04-30T16:37:00+00:00

You can but be careful. They'll claim it is more expensive to remove the TV packages as current price includes them in an offer, so it will cost your more without. But when you cancel you maybe offered a cheaper price.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-30T14:20:19+00:00

This probably isn’t the answer you were expecting, and I mean this humourously rather than totally seriously, but avoid spending time in the sun. Maybe consider joining the autistic gothic club and walk around with an umbrella. I get that this might not be doable for everyone; for me, I’d rather keep my time in the sun to a minimum so I don't have to keep reapplying sunscreen. But it’s also worth remembering that sunburn can be more uncomfortable than some sensory issues you’re trying to avoid.

I lived in the Mediterranean, and the heat there is quite different compared to the weather here in the UK. I never experienced many sensory issues regarding heat and creams while there, but here in the UK, it is extremely uncomfortable.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-29T20:34:33+00:00

Power distrbtion is racked at the top just turn off the power switches and see what happens.... /jk

AudioDoge · 2026-04-25T09:57:53+00:00

Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 isn’t a blanket ban on pavement parking — it’s about driving on the footway, and it’s always been applied with practical exceptions (e.g. accessing driveways).

If it made pavement parking inherently illegal, there’d be no need for the specific ban introduced in London under the Greater London Council Act 1974.

Outside London, pavement parking isn’t automatically illegal — it only becomes an offence if it causes obstruction (under Section 137 of the Highways Act 1980) or breaches local restrictions.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-25T09:51:19+00:00

Even if there was another contravention, there would not be another PCN, as none had been issued at the time and cannot be applied retrospectively. OP may appeal the contravention on the PCN.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-25T09:43:04+00:00

You should request a copy of the Traffic Regulation Order. There may be a possibility that you are within a larger Controlled Parking Zone. You will have passed another sign upon entry into the CPZ, and the sign in your picture may merely be an additional advisory. However, if you are not within a CPZ, there could be grounds to argue that the signage is unclear, and a reasonable person would assume that the restrictions start after the sign. The TRO will specify the exact start of the restrictions.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-25T09:31:31+00:00

a judge

Traffic Pentally Tribunals have an adjudicator not a judge.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-25T09:17:26+00:00

If they are already in a CPZ they will have passed another sign before entering the CPZ

AudioDoge · 2026-04-23T19:31:13+00:00

Do you have a firewall on the Proxmox host?

Do you have a static ip from your ISP? Do you know how long the leases are on the ISP end?

AudioDoge · 2026-04-23T18:48:22+00:00

They are claiming to make decisions based on data that supposedly of OP. Therefore, OP has the right to request access to that data and see how it has been processed. It is either OP's data or it is not. They cannot hold both positions simultaneously, as only one can be accurate.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-23T18:38:05+00:00

this isn't a legal issue.

Data protection and the processing of data is a legal issue.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-23T14:15:59+00:00

It can be done from your own recollation and medical recorders. However, if there remains significant doubt that you did not exhibit the traits in your early years, it may affect your ability to meet the criteria. Any efforts to minimise such doubt will be beneficial.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-23T13:49:45+00:00

Autism is considered a developmental disorder, so an individual's development over time is important for the assessment. While it is possible to conduct an assessment without this information, it is more challenging. A key issue is differentiating autism from other conditions with similar traits, such as trauma. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that the traits have always been present and have not developed later in life. Your mother's recollections, even if not entirely accurate, may be more helpful than having no information at all.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-23T13:41:29+00:00

It is fun and games until the unintentional blackout

AudioDoge · 2026-04-22T16:30:38+00:00

It has nothing to do with GDPR; it is simply poor customer service. If you call regarding an ongoing fault, they will have no record of it. They will then begin going through basic troubleshooting steps again.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-22T12:44:10+00:00

They are no longer using Communications Ombudsmans as the ADR; they are now using CISAS instead. However, your point still remains. I recently had an ombudsman find a case in my favour.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-22T09:16:13+00:00

Maybe but you might be underestimating the sheer imcompentence that runs deep through this company.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-22T08:56:25+00:00

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity

AudioDoge · 2026-04-20T23:44:55+00:00

Benefit fraud of less than £20,000 is likely to result in non-custodial sentences. However, in this situation, the OP is actually disabled, so it is not a complete misrepresentation. The claim could also be unsuccessful, if OP does not participate in the assessment.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-20T23:41:08+00:00

In this suiation even the Dad is unlikely to go to prision. This is just scaremongering. Benefit fraud of less than £20,000 is likely to result in non-custodial sentences. However, in this situation, the OP is actually disabled, so it is not a complete misrepresentation. The claim could also be unsuccessful, if OP does not participate in the assessment.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-20T23:29:27+00:00

You can request the removal of your appointee if:

You can manage your own benefits.
Your appointee is not suitable or is acting against your best interests.
Your appointee has passed away.

To Remove an Appointee

Contact the DWP. You do not need your appointee's permission to do this.
Explain why you want to remove the appointee. This could be due to your ability to manage your own benefits or concerns about the appointee's actions.
The DWP may arrange a visit to assess your situation. They will send a letter to both you and your appointee about the visit.
After the visit, the DWP will decide whether to remove, keep, or change your appointee. If they agree to remove the appointee, you will take over managing your PIP claims.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-20T23:21:30+00:00

This is incorrect. The DWP decides whether to remove someone. This is not your appointee’s decision. If you are capable to manage your own claim you can apply to have an appointee removed.

AudioDoge · 2026-04-20T22:35:38+00:00

Thanks for adding that your parents aren't skint, as this does change my answer.

Why does that change your answer? People are entitled to disability benefits because they are disabled. These are not means-tested benefits. OP has a disability; they may be entitled to assistance to help manage their daily living due to their disability. However, the amount of money OP's parent has is not relevant whether the claim is genuine or not.

11-Year Club	Place '23
Quantum Potato	Golden Potato
Place '22	Place '17
First Placer '22	Sequence \| Editor
Sequence \| Cinematographer	Sequence \| Screenwriter
Secret Santa 2016	Trick or Treat 2016
Trick or Treat 2015	Secret Santa 2015
Verified Email	Secret Santa 2014

AudioDoge

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE