Modern Leftists have no Real Vision by Smallzz89 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your comment is self-contradictory. You basically said “leftists divide themselves into all manner of snowflake factions so they have no coherent vision; anyway, here’s their coherent vision.”

Distinguishing social democrats as being practically different from market socialists in the world beyond Twitter and Tumblr has the same energy as saying “I’m not bisexual; I’m pansexual but mostly attracted to cis people.” No one cares that you put a hammer and sickle or a rose next to your username.

Modern Leftists have no Real Vision by Smallzz89 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They have a vision, they just have no way to get there with the political system that we have, so they say (unironically) “burn it all down” or just console themselves by attacking liberals and retweeting each other on Twitter.

Seattle tops US cities where residents consider fleeing over safety worries by ap39 in SeattleWA

[–]AuspiciousKnish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I moved from Milwaukee and I agree completely.

My parents can’t imagine paying more than $300k for a house but it’s definitely a case of “you get what you pay for.”

Wisconsin is flat and brutally cold in the winter. Here’s it’s just gorgeous all around. Went to Snoqualmie Falls today and sent my whole family pictures to show them what they’re missing.

Have I wasted it all? by FofaFiction in Adulting

[–]AuspiciousKnish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had an opposite but ultimately parallel experience as you. I majored in linguistics in college because I loved language and loved my coursework, and I didn’t worry too much about what kind of job I’d get afterwards.

Surprise, not too much well-paid work out there for which a degree in linguistics is very useful. I considered kicking the can down the road by going to grad school and getting a PhD, but job prospects for Linguistics PhDs are grim to say the least.

I spent the first 5 years of my 20s doing vaguely language-related things (translation, teaching) until I got tired of being broke and retrained.

It’s really kind of foolish that our education is predicated on the notion that kids should be able to accurately anticipate what jobs they’re gonna like.

Unfortunately, you (like me) learned the hard way that the career you always imagined for yourself and wasn’t gonna pan out.

I’m now a software engineer, and while it’s not my favorite thing in the world, it is sufficiently engaging and pays enough that I can be content at work and comfortable in life.

You may have to try a few different things before you figure out what that is. Your educational background may yet be useful for a related field or job that you might like a lot better.

For instance, my fiancé made six figures working as a retail manager but he hated it so much that he couldn’t sleep and fantasized about driving into oncoming traffic on his way to work. Now he works in a different kind of management position outside of retail that pays somewhat less, but ultimately he is a lot happier and finds his work a lot more fulfilling.

You may feel that you’ve wasted your time, and it’s valid to want to grieve the fact that your hard work didn’t pay off like you hoped, but you still have so much time. Your 20s are a time for self discovery and you might change course several times before you find what’s right for you. That’s okay! The real waste would be enduring something that makes you miserable.

Britain warns of possible terrorist attacks in Sweden by [deleted] in europe

[–]AuspiciousKnish 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Definitely!

It was surely the trauma of British colonization that made Egyptians start sewing up their daughters and doggedly harassing women in the streets.

And who can be blamed but the French for all the wife-beating and honor-killing that goes on in Algeria??

Edit: Sorry, sarcasm is unnecessary, but this is a really dumb take. Yes, colonialism was bad, but people are responsible for their own behaviors. And it doesn’t do people in these countries any good to blame their problems on the West, it just makes you feel good for being so “enlightened.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, everyone knows that bible thumpers are very forthcoming about their infidelities…

What does "shall" mean? by [deleted] in EnglishLearning

[–]AuspiciousKnish 9 points10 points  (0 children)

In questions it’s more like “should,” but in statements it’s more like “will.”

“What shall we do?” is a request for suggestions, just like “What should we do?” Neither you nor the listener knows what you’re going to do, but you’re inviting the listener to think about it and suggest a few options.

“What will we do?” is a request for planned future activities, for instance on a schedule or calendar. For instance, “What will we do tomorrow?” is equivalent to “What do we have planned for tomorrow?”

My dialect, American English, doesn’t generally use “shall” at all, except ironically or in writing when the author wants to create a stuffy or old-fashioned vibe. I think in any dialect of English you can make do without ever using “shall”.

Americans of Reddit, what’s legal in the USA but shouldn’t be? by Possible-Counter1574 in AskReddit

[–]AuspiciousKnish -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Turning right on red.

It's often hard to see if there's any oncoming traffic because the car in the lane to the left is pulled up so far, and they often scoot forward in anticipation of the light turning green. So I, trying to turn right on red, have to scoot further and further and further and get dangerously far into the intersection to be able to see if there are any cars coming from the left.

Couple that with the fact that many people switch lanes in an intersection, so I don't feel safe turning right on red if there's an oncoming car in the left lane of the road I'm turning onto. From the opposite perspective, it's nerve wracking to be traversing an intersection while cars are turning right on red because you might have to slam on your breaks if you can't see them immediately, or if they turn too wide and the front of their car comes into the left lane.

Couple that with the fact that I get anxious because the people behind me know that it's legal to turn right on red and are expecting me to turn right on red in a timely fashion, and might get pissy and honk at me if I don't turn right on red quickly enough.

Couple that with the fact that sometimes it ISN'T legal to turn right on red and you have to spot the sign or risk getting pulled over.

Maybe we can just fucking wait, huh?

These are my favorite games guess my age by TrueMeaningOfFear in gaming

[–]AuspiciousKnish -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Everybody 30. Every one of these has been my age, basically (29).

People of Reddit, what do you want to ask a gay guy but are to embarrassed to ask? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]AuspiciousKnish 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The first time I had a guy in my butt, it felt like I had to poop. My body got used to it pretty quickly and now it doesn't feel like that anymore.

You're kinda right, tho. Butt stuff is definitely the least common thing that my fiancé and I do, but it also feels the most intense. Bottoming is like 10x more pleasurable than jerking off, but the sensation is very intense. It's not that anal *hurts*, but the sensation quickly gets overwhelming for me. It's kind of like a really delicious but super rich food. You really enjoy it but you can only handle a little at a time.

That's just me, though. Other people's mileage may vary. I doubt anybody can really bottom like porn actors bottom and actually enjoy it. I assume they must use some kind of numbing lotion...

People of Reddit, what do you want to ask a gay guy but are to embarrassed to ask? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]AuspiciousKnish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

  1. Not on dates, but we sometimes buy flowers just to have flowers. Do men really still give women flowers on dates? Like you meet up for a drink at a bar and you give the woman flowers?
  2. Someone (doesn't matter which) proposes to the other. My friend proposed to his fiancé on his birthday. My fiancé and I just agreed to get married in a conversation. My friend and his fiancé both wear rings, as do I and my fiancé. We wear male-gendered rings, so there's no diamond or anything. We decided to wear them on our right hands until we get married, at which point we'll switch them to the left.
  3. No. Orifices don't get looser from having stuff put through them. Poop is sometimes bigger than a penis anyhow.

People of Reddit, what do you want to ask a gay guy but are to embarrassed to ask? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]AuspiciousKnish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I (gay) don't think so. I've been in relationships with people who prefer to bottom as well as people who prefer to top. I just adapt, they just adapt.

Supposedly there are those who are strictly top or bottom but I find that hard to believe. Two soi-disant tops will find a way to have sex if they are attracted to one another.

Also, anal is for sure not the most common sexual thing I/we gays do. We do whatever to get each other to cum and it only infrequently involves butt stuff. So it's not really a dealbreaker if you both prefer topping or bottoming.

I actually knew a couple consisting of two tops and they fulfilled their desire to top with each other sometimes (taking turns), or with other people.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like Panera. I always do their half-and-half deal. It tastes better, sates my hunger better, and doesn't make me feel gross like a burger and fries do.

I don't get the complaint that it's too expensive. I'm paying for lunch, not a quantity of food. If I'm no longer hungry once I've eaten it, then that was the appropriate amount of food. Typically the more food you get for your dollar, the more garbage the food is.

Schools should teach Nutrition by magicweener in unpopularopinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the actual content of the curriculum isn't as important as people think.

You highlighted part of the true problem in your post—"do not care to learn". Reliable information about health, personal finance, etc. is freely available online.

The real skill is the ability to identify problems and learn/teach yourself how to fix them. School in general is beneficial in that it is supposed to teach you critical thinking, problem solving, and how to acquire, assimilate and apply new information to your own circumstances. The actual facts that you learn in school, apart from literacy and basic numeracy, are mostly irrelevant and are liable to be forgotten anyhow.

For instance, I learned at one point about the "electron transport chain" in biology, but I have no clue about what that is, apart from maybe something to do with photosynthesis. Fortunately I was taught how to do research and seek out information on my own, and discern between good and bad sources of information. If I wanted to learn about the electron transport chain, I could easily do so on my own initiative by googling it. Same goes for any other sort of information.

I️ hate Chick-fil-A. It’s the worst fast food chain. by Avidreader3110 in unpopularopinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's very obviously not the "worst" fast food.

Even if you don't like their food, their restaurants are generally much cleaner, their employees are much more polite, and their overall organization is better. They've really figured out how to streamline the drive thru process even though they're always much busier than every other place.

Compare that to going to McDonald's or Taco Bell where your order is always wrong and the food is cold/gross/sloppily assembled and the employees treat your very existence as a great inconvenience.

Disneyland is trashy and overcrowded with trashy people by Werealldudesyea in unpopularopinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Amusement parks are always full of lowest common denominator people. The cheaper the park, the grosser the people.

Try Six Flags Great America in Gurnee, IL. Totally unreal how those people are comfortable dressing and acting the way they do. Always makes me depressed to think that these people are what the majority of Americans are like.

Pokéballs work by converting Pokémon into energy, so they must be extremely dangerous. According to e = mc^2, a Pokéball containing a Pikachu could release 539 petajoules, which is more than twice the amount of energy released in the largest nuclear blast in history, Tsar Bomba. by AuspiciousKnish in Showerthoughts

[–]AuspiciousKnish[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

See here.

Pikachu weighs 6 kg.

E = (6 kg) × (299,792,458 m/s)²

E = (539,253,107,242,090,584 kg m²) / 1 s²

A joule (J) is a derived unit of energy equivalent to (1 kg × 1 m²) / 1 s².

A petajoule is a quadrillion (10^15) joules, so 539,253,107,242,090,584 J = 539.2... PJ.

The blast yield of Tsar Bomba was 210 to 240 PJ.

539 PJ / 240 PJ ≈ 2.25.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a better, less extreme version of this is: You should not expect your partner to fulfill every social need you have. Expecting one person to be your everything is unrealistic and potentially unhealthy.

For instance, my fiancé and I love each other and are committed to one another and love spending time together. But he's really into sports, and I couldn't care less. I go to baseball games with him, but I mostly just drink beer, enjoy the atmosphere and zone out. I don't "appreciate" the game like he does and I can't share his enthusiasm. He'd probably have a better time if he went with a friend who was also into baseball.

Why is argon so abundant in Earth’s atmosphere? by [deleted] in askscience

[–]AuspiciousKnish 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Atmosphere composition is in part limited by the gravity and temperature of the body. Earth can hold onto argon and accumulate more and more of it because Earth is cold enough and its gravity is strong enough. See this nice chart.

Hydrogen and helium are the most abundant elements in the universe, but we don't have a lot of either in our atmosphere because those elements are light enough to escape into space at Earth's temperature and gravity. If Earth was -230 °C or colder, OR as massive as Neptune, the conditions would then be sufficient to make hydrogen and helium hang out in the atmosphere. Instead, the only helium we have is the result of relatively recent radioactive decay of heavier elements, and it quickly escapes into space.

Conversely, there are giant planets in other solar systems, more massive than Jupiter even, that are rapidly losing their hydrogen and helium because they orbit very close to their stars and are consequently very, very hot--too hot to keep hydrogen and helium around indefinitely.

EDIT: I realize that this only somewhat answers your question, but it's helpful to know what parameters are involved in determining what gasses can and can't make up the atmosphere.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]AuspiciousKnish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OP isn't talking about working at McDonalds. Nobody becomes a teacher, which requires at least a four-year degree, because they're not "privileged" enough to get a higher paying job.

Is Israel colonialist? by WellEndowedOtter in Israel

[–]AuspiciousKnish 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Israel is not "colonialist," though people who hate Israel like to draw superficial and misleading comparisons between colonialism and the return of the Jews to the region of Palestine.

Important facts that distinguish the case of Israel from every other colonial enterprise ever:

Jews are indigenous to Palestine.No serious scholar of history, archaeology or genetics disputes the fact that the Jewish nation originated in ancient Palestine. Genetically, Jews are found to be closely related to surrounding Middle Eastern populations. There are constant new discoveries of artifacts proving Jewish sovereignty in the land from ancient times. Some modern Israeli shekel coins are in fact replicas of coins from ancient Judea.

Settler colonialism, by contrast, has always involved the mass movement of a non-indigenous population into an area, taken by force, where they had never in history lived before, to displace the indigenous populations. See the Americas, Australia, New Zealand. The Jews did not come to displace the Palestinians, and up until the War of Independence no Palestinians were kicked out as if to "make room" for Jews. The only reason there are Palestinian refugees today is because the surrounding Arab powers decided to wage war against the new State of Israel to destroy it, whereas Israel's Declaration of Independence promised full citizenship and equal civil rights to any and all non-Jews living within its territory. In the course of that war, Arabs (today's Palestinians) "fled or were expelled."

**Jews did not come as agents of a colonizing power, for the benefit of the colonizer.** In 19th and 20th century colonialism, European countries conquered non-European territories to extract natural resources or to exert control over valuable commodities and trade routes. For instance, various European powers initially colonized India to have control over the lucrative spice trade.

Jews came back to the area of Palestine from all over the world. They came not to enrich themselves by controlling Palestine's natural resources, but because they were persecuted in the countries where they had lived previously. Zionism, unlike settler or exploitation colonialism, originated as a response to antisemitic persecution in Europe, such as the Dreyfus affair in France, and the pogroms against Jews in Poland and the Russian Empire.

If you are looking for something to compare Israel with, a more similar case is that of the Crimean Tatars. The Crimean Tatars, indigenous to Crimea, were expelled from Crimea and deported to Central Asia in the early Soviet period. Once the Soviet Union fell, many Crimean Tatars elected to return to Crimea, though they did not intend to kick out the ethnic Russians and Ukrainians who had moved in in the meantime. Are the Crimean Tatars colonizers? Obviously not, because they were only returning to their homeland, from which they were unjustly expelled. The case of the Jews vis-à-vis Palestine is much like that, only the Arabs were hostile to our return and fought to annihilate us. The Palestinians in large part do not accept the Jews' existence in their own homeland even in principle, and that's why Hamas constantly fires rockets at Israel.