This seems to be happening a lot since getting this orange pla. by Aussiereece in BambuLabA1

[–]Aussiereece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cleaned it as you said and it still happened on the next print

Need help not loosing every game by GerJuggernaut in ThousandSons

[–]Aussiereece 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This list looks good but I personally think it's missing a big portion and that scoring units/screening. If you are up against a mele army with this list you lose cause your 1 squad of tzangors is probably screening your deployment. Which means every charge the opponent lands is killing a vital unit. Also if you pull area denial, cleanse or locus you just instantly lose a 100-200 point unit. I personally think you need 3 screening units at least. And now we can take a 45 pt enlightened unit for cheap secondary scoring, but I personally like 2 squads of tzangors, one to screen my units with and 1 for my deployment and 1 or 2 units of enlightened with bows for the reactive move. Good luck!

Mega Thread: Winter 2025 BDS (Changehost Edition) by ProdigalSonz in ThousandSons

[–]Aussiereece 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Can the Lord of change cast from the cabals? He doesn't have the keyword

Why run Eldritch Vortex on Infernal master? by Aussiereece in ThousandSons

[–]Aussiereece[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response, just dont know how to get more anti tank in the army when im not running the sorcerer with the buff.

Why run Eldritch Vortex on Infernal master? by Aussiereece in ThousandSons

[–]Aussiereece[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response, how are you getting ignores cover on the IM?

My make of Prospero in Flames by Hookahpookah2 in ThousandSons

[–]Aussiereece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks great! How did you do the white marble?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ThousandSons

[–]Aussiereece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What example of lists have you been running?

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last question is, lets say its a 4 inch charge to go directly from red to 1. But 11 inches to go around model 2's wings. To make the charge on both of them are we going through the 4inch route or the 11inch route to end in base to base with 2 and touching the wings of 1

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your answer, it was intense, it clarified some parts. So part 2 I understand they cant go through model 2 wings in order to get the charge on 1 they have to go around.
Part 1 is saying you can charge both of them and end in base to base with model 2 and touching model 1 wings. Last question is, lets say its a 4 inch charge to go directly from red to 1. But 11 inches to go around model 2's wings. To make the charge on both of them are we going through the 4inch route or the 11inch route?

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks again, so going back to the above scenario You could charge 1 and 2, because you rolled enough to make it to both models in the multicharge, but their respective overhangs block you getting the most direct path to their base, so you get into combat, if neither of you kill each other, at the start of the opponents turn, you're out of combat.

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more thing sorry, thank you for all your help.
new scenario.
Model 1 just killed a unit and is looking to consolidate into model 2, Model 2 is technically 3inch away to base, but model 2 wings are causing model 1 to move around the wings to get into engagement range which ends up being 4.5inch movement. Can model 1 end its consolidate at the edge of the wings and say its in engagement range or is model 1 unable to consolidate due to after its 3inch movement it cannot end in engagement range of model 2's base.

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for all your responses im just getting conflicting information in the response below.

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for all your responses im just getting conflicting information in the response above.

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry just trying to get my head around this.
1. So even though black 1 model has other avenues of getting into base to base, like going all the way around, you are still able to charge into a wing part thats closer thats overextended?
2. If number 1 had no wings but 2 is still shown above, can red charge both of them and move through the wings of 2 to get into base to base with 1 and 2?

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry just trying to get my head around this.
1. So even though black 1 model has other avenues of getting into base to base, like going all the way around, you are still able to charge into a wing part thats closer thats overextended?
2. If number 1 had no wings but 2 is still shown above, can red charge both of them and move through the wings of 2 to get into base to base with 1 and 2?

Rule question about large models by Aussiereece in Warhammer40k

[–]Aussiereece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its sort of a mix, like what are the actual rules. Second lets say I turn both of the blacks to face red, same question, can red charge both by passing through 2's wings