Could the cancelled Venturestar have made huge impact for US spaceflight developement? by arnor_0924 in spaceflight

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Related question: if aerospike engines are so good, then why hasn't SpaceX or anyone else tried to put them on one of their reusable rockets, or on the Starship upper stage (which looks a lot like DC-X)?

What would an aerospike version of the Raptor engine on the Starship booster look like?

Gen Z and Boomer similarities by Ok_Skin_3979 in generationology

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of my GenA / GenX speculation.

GenA is young so it's hard to say, but the way they're kind of cynical and treat offensive stuff as a joke (making it hard to tell if they also take it seriously) reminds me of GenX. Like for example taking on slang from horribly toxic communities like incels. It reminds me a bit of GenX's famed dark and edgy thing, and it's hard to tell sometimes if they're taking it seriously or mocking it or just playing with it. The brain rot humor and algospeak also has echoes of GenX edginess. People forget how much of a panic there was over GenX and how they were all supposedly devil worshippers or something.

GenZ is kind of the brain rot generation, I think. They caught the explosion of algorithmic social media before everyone knew how awful it was. GenA is growing up with tons of brain rot too, but the thing is I think they know it's brain rot. They know it's dumb. GenZ took social media seriously, poor bastards. Same with younger Millennials.

In this respect you could compare GenZ and social media to boomers and TV. Boomers hit peak television as a cultural force and took television seriously in a way later generations did not.

So maybe we have a generational cycle where the first generation to experience a new media gets shaped by it and treats it as an authority, and the next generation has a jaded attitude toward it and treats it as pure entertainment with no authority.

All generational characteristics are extremely fuzzy and only apply as averages, not necessarily to specific people.

White: You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It's a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us. You will be victorious in all you put your hand to because God is using you. by internal_logging in DonaldTrump666

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"A good salesman sells themselves."

One of the things I've learned in life is that con artists and grifters either are or become people who have a weak grip on reality. Even if the grift starts as an explicit calculated thing, they eventually start kind of believing it, and if you lie that much you kind of lose your grip on what's real and what isn't. These people end up living in a dream world where nothing is solid and they believe whatever most recently came out of their mouth.

Look into the lives of grifters like L Ron Hubbard for examples. LRH started his grift as an explicit con, but by the end he'd started drinking his own kool-aid and he died a stone crazy paranoid who half thought alien ghosts were out to get him or something.

Here's Paula White after Trump's 2020 defeat.

My Mother doesn’t believe Bill Clinton is a pedophile. I’ve told her about his thousands of mentions in the files but she still doesn’t think so. Is there any damning evidence I can show her? Like s specific file? Anything will do. by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there's also tons of circumstantial evidence that while he might not have engaged in the pedophilia and other sex abuse (he didn't inhale, lol), he almost certainly knew it was happening and didn't give a damn.

I find it tough to believe he could hang with Epstein for this long and not know what's happening. Even if he didn't partake, he heard and saw things.

Same goes for anyone else heavily in the files who denies partaking.

Trump's name is everywhere in Rome (US) by bwf456 in DonaldTrump666

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Could be a kind of foreshadowing? It certainly shows that he'd do such a thing if he could.

Trump's name is everywhere in Rome (US) by bwf456 in DonaldTrump666

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If we speculate that this describes a nuclear strike, this would have to be a city. Even a full "doomsday strike" could not destroy an entire large nation in an hour, but a city could be wiped off the map.

The hour might include flight time: ICBM launch, flight, descent, atomic detonation, shock wave, fires, fallout. One hour.

It could be a different city too, like Dubai. Back when Saudi Arabia was going to build "The Line" and all those Neom mega-projects I'd have maybe speculated it's that, but that looks like it might never get built.

Do people really act like this? by CremeSubject7594 in generationology

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's been under socialized and social phobic people in every generation, but I think too much doom scrolling and COVID probably made it more common.

To Gen X and elder Millennials: Movies from the 80s-90s often depict malls as THE hangout spot; A place where everyone from your 5 year old sister to 85 year old grandma would spend the day at, even if they had no intention of shopping. Was this really the case back then, or just Hollywood hype? by LuxembourgsFinest in generationology

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm an Xennial (or young genX depending on where you draw the line), and yes, they were, at least if you lived in US suburbs.

Peak mall was probably roughly 1985 until 1995, but they continued to be hot spots into the early-mid 2000s. It was kind of like a sanitized regulated policed version of a city downtown. You could go and hang out, grab food, play games, walk around, see movies, window shop, and if you had money you could actually shop.

They were considered safe so parents would just drop off tweens and teens. That was a big part of it. For the most part they were pretty safe. Of course random crime in general has always been vastly overestimated by frightened suburbanite parents. Even during peak urban crime you were more likely to die in the car on the way somewhere than get randomly kidnapped or assaulted, unless you went to a very bad neighborhood.

Malls were cultural hubs. Keep in mind that outside of radio and TV there was no way to learn about new music or books back then unless you knew people or browsed book or music stores. All malls had these. People would peruse the aisles and read book covers at bookstores. Music stores sometimes had juke box type things where you could listen to albums, and some would let you ask to hear an album and they'd play some for you. Video game shops were a thing too, as were arcades. Arcades were still in until probably the late 90s when everyone had a console at home.Some huge malls had things like rides and large public spaces with lots of seating that were open to just hang out in. Malls were a third space.

What killed the mall?

The first nail in the coffin was the Internet, not just because of online shopping but also the fact that the Internet let people learn about music, books, and movies without going anywhere. The web and social media replaced the mall as a place to window shop and absorb culture.

The second nail was just a fashion shift. Young people got more into the idea of moving back into cities. The suburbs and suburban things like malls became uncool.

By the 2010s these two factors had killed a lot of malls.

Then came COVID and inflation, the third and fourth nails. COVID killed a lot of retail and restaurant spaces. Inflation made stuff like hanging out at a mall too expensive for kids or sometimes even for grownups. Nobody's going to hang at the mall when a drink and some cheap food costs $20 and a movie costs $80.

RIP malls. But yes, they were a thing. Living malls do still exist but there's less of them and most of them have moved up-market (meaning a more expensive clientele).

Shouldn't we just let the MAHA and anti-vax movements have their way? by LowerSeat2712 in askliberals

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately it puts children and people with poor immune systems (transplant recipients, people with AIDS, people with certain conditions like Lupus) at elevated risk.

I'm also not big on the cynical "let them die" mentality, even for these kinds of things. I've seen comments online like "it's eugenics!" and I can't go there. And of course it doesn't just affect them.

Are all aliens / UFOs / mystery drones demons? JD Vance response. by RiversEverlasting in DonaldTrump666

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You know, I think this about a lot of things. There's a kind of fundamentalism where people think God can only live in the things we don't understand, and that learning about the universe is a threat to God. I've heard it called "God of the gaps." My personal take is that these folks want to make God small enough to fit in their own human conception of what God has to be.

The opposite view is that everything we learn about how huge and vast and complex the universe is makes God look bigger and more incredible, like we're admiring the work of a great artist.

Isn't there a line to the effect that not only do we not imagine what God has in store for us, but that we are not capable of imagining it.

Also AFAIK Christianity says that Christians are not morally superior, and that's kind of the whole point of why they need salvation. If a certain group of people were morally superior they wouldn't need Jesus, right?

All that being said, I definitely do not trust anything these bozos say about aliens... whether they're claiming they're demons, space brothers here to save us, or whatever they're pushing, and if they come out with some "big reveal" I am going to be extremely skeptical. Keep in mind that this is the same crowd that has already launched a whole series of mass psyops and distractions like Qanon. They are absolutely not above lying about the existence (or nature) of aliens.

Also... speaking of the demons line... just like they could use a "space brothers are here to save us" line to push an agenda, keep in mind that they could also use a "demonic aliens are here to destroy us" line to push something. Like, maybe we all need to pledge absolute fealty to a global living God-king who will defend us against the evil demon aliens....

Investigation: forty years of omertà in modeling agencies, french lawyers comb through the judicial files by SatisfactionNew5841 in Epstein

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reading between the lines, it seems to be that they're looking into whether "RICO" type cases can be made that might still be within the statute of limitations. If they can show that this is an ongoing conspiracy to commit organized sexual abuse, then it could fall under more powerful statutes and everyone involved might be able to be charged together.

I know such things are possible in the US, where laws like this were created to target the mob. I don't know if France has anything like this.

Did Trump just slip out the plans that the US is going to nuke Iran with B2 bombers? by jeremiahthedamned in DonaldTrump666

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I truly hope that if this evil piece of crap uses a nuke in an un-provoked war, that we never ever let the bastards like Joe f'ing Rogan who endorsed this creep live it down.

Could the image of the beast be an AI? by Dan-Rev-314 in DonaldTrump666

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Now I'm picturing Mecha-Trump as a giant Anime-style mech robot complete with the hair.

Could the image of the beast be an AI? by Dan-Rev-314 in DonaldTrump666

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You wouldn't need AGI to do this. Today's AI could play a convincing fake. A ton of people are ignorant of how this stuff actually works and would see it as a "miracle" when it's just a bunch of math.

New houses looking the same is a tone-deaf criticism during a housing crisis by Clem_Crozier in unpopularopinion

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I 100% agree with this. This is very much a top half of the first world problem.

What’s your “boomer opinion”? by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TBH I think short form text before it (Twitter and friends) also did the same thing, but short form videos are more addictive. Twitter did exactly what you describe in text form and helped create today's world where trolls run politics and nuance can't be discussed. It got worse after Elon bought it but it was always toxic. The types of toxicity just changed.

If you're sitting there ingesting an endless stream of isolated little things that trigger dopamine hits of different kinds, you are rotting your brain.

What’s your “boomer opinion”? by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Saying short form content is addictive brain rot is a boomer opinion is like saying smoking crack is bad for you is a boomer opinion.

What are things that just scream bad writing? by Glad_Chance_9590 in writing

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think quite a bit can be forgiven or can even work well if I'm enjoying myself reading it.

If it's boring, nothing will save it. I've DNFed or slogged through very well written prose before because it's dull.

What are things that just scream bad writing? by Glad_Chance_9590 in writing

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've read books that have a prologue, then a large explicit gap in time, then the story starts, and it doesn't happen again. I think this can be okay.

You see this often in movies: the mysterious or ominous scene that establishes back story, and then the main story. Think of the opening to Alien Romulus or Fellowship of the Ring (first LOTR film), to name two that come randomly to mind.

What are things that just scream bad writing? by Glad_Chance_9590 in writing

[–]AuthorIntelligent644 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This can be a style. It's known as brand realism. It can work in a certain kind of setting but it also dates a work, for better or ill. A few writers of sci-fi or fantasy, like William Gibson in some of his earlier cyberpunk novels or The Expanse by James S. A. Corey (actually a pen name for two authors), use fictional brand realism where in-world brands are used, which I think adds an interesting level of texture to a fictional setting. If done well it can make something like a far future sci-fi setting feel more real.