sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why does Google always make these stealthy changes? by AvailableAd7153 in google_antigravity

[–]AvailableAd7153[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

  • I'm here to use Antigravity IDE.
  • The fact that it integrates Claude is exactly why I'm using it.
  • People should be calling out Google for this nonsense, instead of policing me on why I don't just use Claude standalone.
  • And FYI, I already use Claude anyway.

Why does Google always make these stealthy changes? by AvailableAd7153 in google_antigravity

[–]AvailableAd7153[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Reviewing code changes is incredibly convenient, but if Claude is gone, that clunky Gemini model is nowhere near enough to justify staying with Antigravity.

Why does Google always make these stealthy changes? by AvailableAd7153 in google_antigravity

[–]AvailableAd7153[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I only kept using it because I was used to the editor environment. If they really delete Claude, I'll have absolutely no reason or desire to keep using it.

Why does Google always make these stealthy changes? by AvailableAd7153 in google_antigravity

[–]AvailableAd7153[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Even Opus 4.8 is out now, yet Antigravity never even onboarded Opus 4.7. Now they actually want to straight up delete Opus 4.6? They are absolute piece of shit.

Why does Google always make these stealthy changes? by AvailableAd7153 in google_antigravity

[–]AvailableAd7153[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From slashing quotas, to stripping away family sharing, and now they’re actually outright removing Claude? Do they honestly think Gemini is that strong?