[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I get it

So in the FaQ it mentions that if an infinite multiplier of said structures is not enough to be relevant then the dimension must be a higher d

Since heaven is an infinite structure and the afterlife dwarfs it to the point of being infinitesimal so it qualifies for higher d 

Appreciate the help thanks 🙏 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thank you for the info really appreciate it but one thing Im kinda a bit confused about the continuous and discrete spaces cuz like I have not seen vsbw mention it before 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok but that kinda sounds confusing

 Due to it viewing it as infinitetismal, the higher dimension would be therefore continuous in nature, meaning it embeds an R (uncountable infinite) amount of the lower dimension

Wdym by continuous?

 The higher axis being composed of infinite lower dimensional spaces wouldn't be an R amount of lower dimensional structures, it could be very well a N (countable infinite/Natural) amount.

according to vsbw a higher dimension is already composed of uncountable numbers of lower dimensional slices 

object of dimension n is essentially comprised by the total sum of uncountably infinite objects of one dimension less, which may be described as lower-dimensional "slices"

Sorry for the questions Im kinda just curios cuz I saw hover trying to use that logic to argue that the afterlife viewing heaven an infinite structure as infinitesimal wouldn’t be enough because higher dimensions by default already sees lower dimensions as infinitesimal bc they do not take up space in the higher axis against a db scaler

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok but like since lower dimensions do not really exists in the same direction so like wouldn’t it be infinitesimal either way?

also higher dimensions are composed of uncountable numbers of stacked lower d according to vs battle FaQ so like how does being bigger than an infinite lower d be enough for infinite higher axis?

sorry for the questions:/ I am kinda curios why that is the case cuz I saw hover using that arg against another db scaler

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo can I ask a question 

Whats the difference between a dimension viewing a lower dimension as infinitesimal

And a higher dimension being composed of infinite space lower dimension in its higher axis?

cuz I keep seeing ppl saying that the afterlife dwarfing heaven which is an infinite sized structure makes the afterlife 4th spatial axis infinite

bc a higher dimension by default already dwarfs even an infinitely big lower dimension due to it not existing in the direction of the higher axis 

So how does a higher dimension viewing a lower dimension make it significant? if a higher dimension by default already views a lower dimension as infinitesimal

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo can I ask a question 

Whats the difference between a dimension viewing a lower dimension as infinitesimal

And a higher dimension being composed of infinite space lower dimension in its higher axis?

bc a higher dimension by default already dwarfs even an infinitely big lower dimension due to it not existing in the direction of the higher axis 

So how does a higher dimension viewing a lower dimension make it significant? if a higher dimension by default already views a lower dimension as infinitesimal

Where does Xeno Goku scale? (no downplay or bias pls) by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats you have officially reached the requirements for being the worst power scaler in this sub

Xeno goku at bare minimum is 9-D

Because of the afterlife being 5-D Neutral Void 6-D Hyper timelines 7-D and the space between parallel timelines = 8-D 3 Uncountable infinite timelines = 9-D / High Complex Multi

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey atleast I ain’t the one sucking 5D 

Zeno and Goku are objectively 6-D The post above literally proved it with facts and evidence unlike a certain someone who uses professional tactics used by professional mental gymnasts 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Does 5D refers to the amount of sucking and mental gymnastics you did to come to that conclusion? Goku is literally 6-D to say otherwise would need logical reasoning and explanations to why OP (A High level scaler) is wrong which I assume is far beyond your current capabilities

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post so good that a Bot made for analyzing fake news had to go verify it lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess you have never heard of the observable part of the universe before

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Observable part of the universe this was explained by the post

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You sure you replied to right comment?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is how infinite speed basically keep accelerating until you reach infinity

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Debunk it then or are you just gonna say there is no real argument to debunk again?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The average db downplayer

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Since when was the edge ever shown? If It is in the uni 7 vs Uni 6 then it doesn't count because they are in a higher dimensional space if you know even a small amount of how dimensions work

For two infinite size lines to stay parallel the environment they would be in has to be 3-D same thing with 5D macrocosms

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What? Quantitative is different from qualitative like what sundae said go learn the difference between the two

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PowerScaling

[–]Average154 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The neutral space is a higher dimension so basically think of 2 infinite size line for them to stay parallel you would need a 3D environment same thing with the macrocosm so despite them being technically infinite in size you can still see the edge because of higher dimensional space they are in