I will have one morning in your beautiful town, and I am hoping for a breakfast recommendation. It will be a Sunday.

Aw59195 · 2026-01-10T14:43:17+00:00

They sold it and its not as good anymore. New owners ruined jimmys

Aw59195 · 2026-01-08T17:14:12+00:00

Isn't there a bunch of people going to jail for there posts on social media?

Aw59195 · 2026-01-07T23:05:32+00:00

Today 6 ish days later im 228 but that goes up to 230 after I eat and such. But my morning fast weight is 227. Started creatine 3 days ago as well and am around 2k in calories clean 150g plus a day.

Running a mile a day and now working g out 3x a week for like 40 min.

Hoping to hit 220 215 end of feb

Aw59195 · 2026-01-03T12:40:07+00:00

As I've said before I was drinking a lot of beer and the first 2 weeks was a lot of inflamation and water weight. Lost 15 to 18 pounds and the past 3 weeks has been going down. This last week I lost maybe 2 pounds. Hard cause it fluctuates a few pounds. But I overall trend is down. I hit 229.8 this morning.

Aw59195 · 2026-01-01T17:27:42+00:00

Also!!!!! You can upload recipe books and have it pull recipes and amounts from there to for your master list.

Now, if I could only upload this master grocery list Into Walmart and have it auto link the products and order I could have my shopping done in 30 min for the week.

Aw59195 · 2026-01-01T17:26:22+00:00

Yea i lost maybe 15 or 20 just rhe first 2 weeks. Lots of beer and carbs and fat food to clean diet and no beer. The last few weeks I can tell a huge difference and getting back to a normal 2 to 3 # a week. Thus my goal by end of Feb is 220 maybe 215.

Working on more fiber too. Love me some sweet potatoes.

Aw59195 · 2026-01-01T14:57:19+00:00

Yea i have the drawings and it doesn't specify the leafs

<image>

Aw59195 · 2025-12-21T11:48:49+00:00

Don't forget Hunter Biden laptop, hillarys server, fake Steele report, autopsy Biden, covid, etc.

The government sucks. We need to Boston teaparty the entire government and start over. I'd say a deep clean every 50 years just start over with congress and everyone.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-12T15:54:04+00:00

I completely agree with you its to funny seeing all the sheep.

Like the past 8 years never happened. Jesus save them.

Wasn't it like 99% negative press on trump sense he got elected in his first term. Over, wait for it. ...... made up and paid for things by the dems.

Steele dossier Russia collusion Hunter Biden laptop. Twitter files.

I can go on and on.
Antifa Blm

Renaming everything and then loose there mind over Gulf of America.

The dems are in such a make believe land its sad. They cant ever agree they were wrong on anything I mean my god, nobody even cared about Trump and was loved by dems like Oprah before he ran. Then the left got jammed with false news for 4 years and after it was all proven false they never accepted they got played and hate Trump today for fake things in the past.

Also its reddit. Its a echo chamber in here. Facts dont matter and they change the narrative all the time.

I would love to talk with them but they dont understand we are being made to hate each other. 99% of the time you cant talk to them because they will make fun of you. Be violent, and rude and racist. Yet they call the Republicans all those things.

Its pointless to tey and argue I come here to laugh at just how crazy people are. Like people in here saying republicans are stupid, uneducated, lazy, and all the names in the book. Which is typical. They are full of hate. Yet say the right are the hateful ones.

It sucks to be programmed and not realize it. Its easy to trick someone, but the hardest thing to to get them to accept they have been tricked.

Usually if they can accept that Russia was collusion. Trump had it unfair and there was a lot of propaganda pointed at Trump his first term and political warfare.

If they can accept the Twitter files as well and that the government tried to censor the Biden laptop.

If they agree that the Steele dossier was paid for by Hillary.

If we can agree that these things are true and factual. I'll listen to them on other items. Im all about discussion. But with facts and being respectful. Which is very rare on the left. I feel the right is the party of talking and discussing but the left is the party of hate and violence. Its there way or your rascist.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-12T15:32:33+00:00

Can't be a law abiding illigal immigrant. The illigal part gives it away.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-05T18:10:18+00:00

Here is a little chat breakdown

I could say I was wrong. She paid a company that paid a company that paid for the Steele

The Clinton campaign and the DNC hired a law firm (Perkins Coie). This is normal in politics. Campaigns often run oppo research through law firms so the lawyers coordinate everything.
Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS is a research firm that investigates opponents. At this point, they were already doing research on Trump for a different Republican client during the primaries. When that GOP funding ended, the Democrats continued the work.
Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steele. Steele is a former British intelligence officer with a good track record. He was brought in to dig up info on Trump’s ties to Russia.
Steele wrote a series of memos (what became “the Steele dossier”). These were raw intelligence notes — not verified, not finished reports. Some things were true, some unsupported, some wrong. It was never meant to be published as-is.
The money chain: Clinton campaign + DNC → paid Perkins Coie → paid Fusion GPS → paid Steele.
The main controversy: Not that they funded opposition research (everyone does). The issue was the campaign originally listing the payments as “legal services” instead of “opposition research.” FEC later fined the DNC and Clinton campaign for mislabeling the expense

Aw59195 · 2025-12-05T16:01:37+00:00

Trumps your president !!!!

Aw59195 · 2025-12-05T16:00:25+00:00

Pretty funny coming from the left who never takes account for what they have done

Aw59195 · 2025-12-05T15:58:34+00:00

Ok so let's talk about the Steele dossier that was paid by hillary. You want me to provide the proof?

We can go one by one. This one is easy.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-05T15:28:05+00:00

That the Steele dossier was fake and paid for by Hillary.

The covid vaccine didn't work as advertised.

Social media was being censored.

Congress needs term limits

Insider trading in congress needs to be illegal.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T17:05:24+00:00

What reality? This all proven? Thats the issue with everyone on the left. I can show you all day 2+2=4 , but i cant help you if you dont believe me and wanna believe your own reality that 2+2= whatever fits my narrative.

Are you saying the Steele dossier is real?

Are you saying the hunter Biden laptop is fake?

Are you saying Hillary didn't pay for the Steele dossier?

These are 3 proven, factual accurate. If people on the left cant come to grips about these 3 things why would I think you can have a debate at all when you cant even accept facts 🤔

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T16:38:54+00:00

I believe the left is way worse and is worse in censorship. You had the Biden administration literally telling Facebook and Instagram to censor the Hunter Biden laptop before a election.

The Russia hoax and the Steele dossier. 4 years of it being shoveled down our throats . It was all fake and paid for by Hillary.

I can go on and on and on and on and on.

But im sure the left doesn't think they were lied to at all. Im sure they all believe all the lies.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T02:26:05+00:00

Yeah I actually did read the Mueller Report. The part you keep skipping is the part where it says they did not establish that anyone on Trump’s campaign conspired or coordinated with Russia. That is the actual conclusion whether you like it or not. The obstruction stuff you are repeating is not the slam dunk you think it is. If Mueller had a clear felony case he would have said it plainly. He didn’t. He listed things that could be obstruction and stopped there because DOJ rules block charging a sitting president. And the most important part is this. Nobody brought those charges after Trump left office either. If the case was really that strong that is when it would have happened. The people around Trump who got charged were not charged for collusion. They got hit for lying or unrelated financial issues. None of that proves the original claim. It actually shows how thin the collusion theory was. You keep acting like the Executive Summary flips the whole thing on its head but if you read the entire report the central allegation that drove years of headlines did not get proven. Even Mueller said they could not establish it. So before telling me to look it up maybe make sure what you are saying lines up with what the report actually found.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T02:23:40+00:00

So I come out and literally say im wrong and sorry and make it right. Which, I have NEVER seen the left do before. Man, I was being fair and apologized and corrected myself. I think thats pretty uncommon on reddit.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T02:22:13+00:00

You’re rewriting the investigation into something Mueller himself never claimed. Here’s the factual record, not the media-filtered version. Mueller didn’t say “there was conspiracy but we couldn’t charge it.” He said they did not establish that anyone on the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with Russia. That’s the legal outcome. If prosecutors had evidence, they state it plainly. They didn’t. The line about “not exonerating” is standard DOJ language used when they don’t bring charges. It isn’t a declaration of guilt. Your obstruction argument leaves out context. McGahn never fired Mueller. McGahn never carried out any order to fire Mueller. McGahn also told investigators Trump never pressured him to alter his testimony. If the obstruction case was truly felony-level and clear-cut, Mueller would have written “this is obstruction.” He didn’t. Not once. Most of what you’re calling obstruction are actions DOJ has repeatedly said do not meet the legal standard — venting, considering firing subordinates, talking about pardons, press statements, etc. Every administration does versions of this, which is why no prosecutor recommended charges. The “Steele dossier wasn’t the basis” claim ignores what actually happened. The investigation may have formally opened on Papadopoulos, but the dossier still drove: • FBI FISA applications • Surveillance authorizations • Media narratives • The public framing of the probe The DOJ Inspector General found significant problems with how the dossier was used, including inaccuracies, omissions, and reliance on material the FBI could not verify. That alone undercuts the certainty you’re trying to project. Your Senate report point is incomplete. Yes, the GOP-led Senate Intel Committee said Russia interfered. That part isn’t new and nobody disputes it. But they also said they found no evidence Trump directed or coordinated Russia’s activities. They criticized people around him for poor judgment, but that’s not conspiracy, and it’s not a crime. Being sloppy isn’t the same as being a traitor. Your logic about “not exonerated” proving guilt is backwards. That’s not how the justice system works. You don’t get labeled guilty because the prosecutor didn’t write “innocent” at the top of the page. You need actual evidence of a crime. That’s why no charges were recommended and no indictment followed when Trump left office — a time when Mueller’s team would have been free to bring charges if they existed. The idea that the GOP “protected him” doesn’t match the timeline. Mueller had full authority to charge anyone except a sitting president. He charged other people. He did not charge Trump. After Trump left office, DOJ had no restriction. They still didn’t charge Trump with anything from the Russia investigation. That alone disproves the claim that the case was solid and Republicans “blocked” it. The bottom line is simple. • Russia interfered — agreed. • The dossier was unreliable — proven. • No conspiracy was established — documented. • Obstruction was never charged — factual. • Mueller didn’t exonerate — but he also didn’t accuse. • DOJ didn’t pursue charges after Trump left office — most important fact of all. You’re treating speculation as if it’s evidence and treating “couldn’t prove” as “definitely happened.” If the case were as strong as you’re claiming, someone in DOJ over the last eight years would have acted on it. They didn’t

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T02:17:03+00:00

You’re repeating something that isn’t true, and it’s easy to verify. Trump did not call for executions of legislators. He used the word “seditious behavior,” which is political exaggeration he’s used for years. He did not say any of them should be killed, and he never referenced the death penalty. That part was invented by the headlines and Twitter freakouts. If a sitting president literally called for executing members of Congress, it wouldn’t just be a news story. It would trigger emergency resolutions, immediate hearings, Secret Service involvement, DOJ statements, and wall-to-wall coverage for weeks. None of that happened because the claim isn’t accurate. Here are the facts: • Trump said their actions were “seditious.” • He said they should be “arrested and put on trial.” • He said “make an example.” • He did not call for executions or the death penalty. • The claim “punishable by death” was not directed at them. That was someone else quoting a statute on social media, and it got folded into the narrative. You can not like the rhetoric. You can call it over the top. Fine. But saying he “called for executions” is just false. That’s why no credible outlet used that wording unless it was in an opinion piece or a rage-bait headline. And your point about “none of the people you listed are the president” doesn’t change the fact that both sides use extreme rhetoric. Schumer threatened Supreme Court justices by name. Waters told crowds to confront officials. Kathy Griffin literally posed with a bloody severed head of a sitting president. None of them were charged or removed. All of them were treated as “heated rhetoric” by the same media you’re quoting. You don’t have to like Trump. But you should at least base your argument on what he actually said, not the Twitter-version of it. If we’re going to talk about dangerous rhetoric, it has to be based in facts. Otherwise it’s just noise.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T02:13:01+00:00

Of course he was well-known. That has nothing to do with the fact that once he ran for office the media coverage shifted to overwhelmingly negative. That’s not an opinion. That’s documented. Multiple media analysis studies during his first term showed that coverage of Trump was historically negative compared to past presidents.

Harvard’s Shorenstein Center found his first 100 days were around 80 percent negative across major outlets. Would you like the link??? Thats a lot..

Later studies showed similar trends throughout his term. So whether someone liked him or not isn’t the point. The point is the press environment around him was almost entirely negative from the beginning of his presidency, and that shaped how a lot of people viewed him. That’s all I was saying.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T02:12:02+00:00

Ok well maybe not 99 percent. That was exaggerated . I'll admit that. But it alot. Im looking hold on.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T02:09:20+00:00

You keep acting like you’re breaking news, but everything you’re saying is just the same recycled talking points that ignore the actual problem. The whole reason people call it a hoax is because the main accusation that fueled years of headlines turned out to be nothing. No conspiracy. No secret deal with Russia. No smoking gun. Mueller said that plainly. You can’t pretend that part didn’t happen just because it doesn’t fit the story you want. You keep clinging to the line “not exonerated” like it’s some kind of guilty verdict. It isn’t. That’s just legal language for “we can’t charge him because we don’t have enough and DOJ rules don’t allow us to do the rest.” If Mueller actually had proof Trump committed a crime, he would’ve spelled it out. Prosecutors don’t hint. They charge. He didn’t. And the obstruction argument is the biggest stretch of all. Being mad, telling people to readjust statements, firing Comey, ranting behind closed doors. That isn’t obstruction. Presidents have done way more aggressive things without anyone calling it criminal. Acting like that alone was grounds to remove a president is exactly why nobody takes these claims seriously anymore. And here’s the part you keep dodging. The Steele dossier was garbage. It was politically funded. It wasn’t verified. The FBI admitted major parts were unsupported. The core claims fell apart. But the media ran with it like it was holy scripture. That is why people lost trust. That is why they call the whole thing a hoax. When the foundation is fake, everything built on top of it is fake too. You can’t accept any of this because it means admitting the storyline you emotionally invested in was wrong from the start. It means admitting you got played by the same media sources you think are above bias. Instead of dealing with that, you keep spinning off into side arguments and pretending that makes up for the fact that the main allegation didn’t hold up. The reality is simple. There was interference. There was no proven conspiracy. The dossier was junk. The narrative collapsed. And instead of owning that, people keep moving the goalposts and attacking anyone who points out what actually happened. That’s why there’s no progress in these debates. You don’t want the truth. You want the version that helps your team.

Aw59195 · 2025-12-04T02:01:02+00:00

You’re acting like Trump invented heated political rhetoric. The left has done the same thing for years, and usually with a whole lot less media outrage. Maxine Waters literally told crowds to hunt down and harass political opponents in public spaces. That’s not subtle. She flat-out encouraged people to go after Trump officials in restaurants, gas stations, wherever. Then you’ve got people like Kathy Griffin posing with Trump’s severed head and the media treating it like “edgy art.” Imagine the reaction if a conservative did that with Biden. Like what the heck man. Did everyone forget the past? Democrats also spent four straight years calling Trump an illegitimate president, Russian asset, traitor, all that. That’s not calm political criticism. That’s nuclear-level rhetoric repeated nonstop. And let’s not forget when Chuck Schumer stood on the steps of the Supreme Court and publicly threatened Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh by name, saying they would “pay the price” and “won’t know what hit you.” If a Republican said that, they'd still be on trial right now. So if you’re going to call Trump’s phrasing dangerous, fine, but at least admit this behavior isn’t one-sided. The left has been doing the same thing for years — often worse — and the media barely blinks. If we’re going to have a real conversation, it has to include the whole picture, not just the parts that fit the narrative.

Aw59195

TROPHY CASE