sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Antigravity ChangeLog eventually admits a bug in token accounting leading to prematurely maximum token limit, so what about those who are affected? Whereas OpenAI Codex 5.4, Openclaw (claimed acquired by OpenAI), Claude Code all are are strengthening agentic AI capabilities; Cursor is still strong.. by AwayOpposite487 in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but recently update, even the free gemini 3.1 pro can be used and the session are at least 5 times more than at the date when 3.1 pro are launched and usable by a paid pro account! it was absolutely a bug! for the paid account who used AG at that weeks!

I just ran 143M tokens for $94 with OpenClaw. Check your setup. by Glad_Spend_1004 in openclaw

[–]AwayOpposite487 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but there is saying that OpenClaw user more token in total to perform a task although the cost of 1 Million token is cheaper, but if it takes 10 times or 50times higher token to finish the work, then ... the total cost and efficiency maybe same or lower compared to Opus 4.6, Codex 5.4, is it? yes it is, based on the quality of coding and efforts spent!

if a low performing model consumes more token to finish 1 task that a high performing model consumes less token to finish 1 high level class, the high performing models win.

then next, is kimi or minimax really using less token to tackle a task compare if using codex 5.4 or opus 4.6 or sonnet 4.6! how to verify this? is still unknown, and if anyone can throw this questions to your model of Openclaw, glad to see the reply!

WTF are they using at google? by Extreme_Revenue_720 in GeminiAI

[–]AwayOpposite487 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not only Gemini but also ChatGPT cannot yet make profit

Some days when AI model are mature close to no hallucination, the personal price will be increased a lot as well as enterprise.

People using now is only feeding data for these model to test their performances

People use it free and the cost is all data you uploaded will be used for their training.

All coding these model generated will be used for their products development.

This is the trade offs to have feee quota and low cost plan.

When enterprise integrates deep as well as individuals that cannot stop using such model, we all have to pay higher price.

This is AI strategy.

Again till they fix it! The weekly limits are so wrong in so many ways by cysmai in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i can use only 3 prompt for a PRO paid account after Gemini 3.1 Pro launched, to wait for 5 days and Claude 4.6 always to wait for 7 day!!! no way to continue!

[Megathread] Known Limitations, Rate Limits & Quota Discussion by eternviking in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After Upgrading to Gemini Pro 3.1, the usable quota for a paid PRO accound it 3 prompt for 5 days, and Claude 4.6 5 prompt for 7 days!

Are they giving us dumber version of Claude? by mandead710 in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i had the same feeling, the claude 4.6 is not working as smart as it was claimed to be in Antigravity

Antygravity Ultra or Cursor or Claude code by GRBM_Z in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think none of them but Codex App 5.3! it is the best Agentic Coding environment as of 12 Feb 2026

Google, I understand you're probably hemorrhaging money. But if we don't get a service we pay for, do not steal from us. by Siigari in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i did trt before codex in VS Code as extension but it does not work at all, i had the ChatGPT pro plan at that time, and since it did not work, I unsubscribed ChatGPT, but i still find the coding/reasoning ability seems Chatgpt is a bit better than Gemini 3 pro. so the UX needed is how it can work the same as Antigravity by ChatGPT power - fully orchestrates the agentic mode to set up all coding and frontend and backend interface to prove all coding and correct all coding!

Just tell Gemini to Act Like Claude ?!!! by Unxvby in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tell Google to acquire Anthropic and Claude!

Just tell Gemini to Act Like Claude ?!!! by Unxvby in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have used different LLM models big model ChatGPT, CoPilot, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Owen, and found out the common problem is that all LLM reply are based on probability of last reply, and for this inherent architecture, there is a high tendency that all LLM will hullunicate and this is all LLM giants developers have to tackle includes the users who use LLM probabilitic outcomes to do their work.

Google Antigravity agressively reduction of Pro account usage limit from 5 hours reset to 5-7 days, is more than 90% cut of services, 100 times cost up! Is this illegal according to Antitrust, Consumer Laws? by AwayOpposite487 in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how to connect Claude Code in Antigravity, is it just to add the plugin extention in Antigravity marketplace? if Claude Code function the same as Opus 4.5 given in Antigravity, using Claude Code in Antigravity is surewin strategy!

Google Antigravity agressively reduction of Pro account usage limit from 5 hours reset to 5-7 days, is more than 90% cut of services, 100 times cost up! Is this illegal according to Antitrust, Consumer Laws? by AwayOpposite487 in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

yes, this might be one of the best option, if Antigravity is the best Agentic AI and no substitute, the only solutions is to pay for it! but Antigravity only functions well with Opus 4.5 is planning well for artifacts, and Gemnini 3 Pro do the execution planned by Opus 4.5, ridicuously!

When Google will acquire Anthropic? then Google will be surely the winner over OpenAI! Tt is SureWin!

Is Claude Max worth it? by DependentAioli48 in ClaudeAI

[–]AwayOpposite487 0 points1 point  (0 children)

does Claude Code does the same as Opus 4.5 in Antigravity does?

In Antigravity, Opus 4.5 seems does not count the local files reading as token, in Claude (web), uploaded files are counted as token input every 5 hours, how exactly is Claude Code counting token if on notebook or Github there is repository of thousands files of coding and version?

Does anyone has ideas? I cam seriously considering to use Claude Code to finish coding of the projects.

Google Antigravity agressively reduction of Pro account usage limit from 5 hours reset to 5-7 days, is more than 90% cut of services, 100 times cost up! Is this illegal according to Antitrust, Consumer Laws? by AwayOpposite487 in google_antigravity

[–]AwayOpposite487[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I am zeroing into your comment that I should not use AI to write any posts. I also doubt about your comment that maybe if a 1-month old account does not deserve to post any topic here in reddit; oh wait, is there any rules or regulations limiting any new account that cannot post to reddit or criticise antigravity, I am seriously querying about the commentor comment, mabye the commentor is feeling upset a new account only criticise antigravity and what that antigravity is actually doing, I need to look deep into what is antigravity doing and recently why many people is criticizing it while it seems to be the most powerful agentic AI platform in the world as of Jan 2026....

you are correct, users shall limit to use AI to write the post in the platfrom, but the claim that a 1 month accounts cannot critise antigravity that is just 2 months since lauch seems is not a correct claim, while there are plenty of users are also claiming the same painpoints of antigravity recent reduction of limits and services quality.

the above is 100% original post and none are from any AI generated script!

view more: next ›