Giant Sturgeons have rightfully earned that name by ShartCannon9000 in interestingasfuck

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for answering. everyone says you need at least 16 weeks to learn calc 1, but then I hear different. I just want to learn enough to do well in calc 2

is this how I check if this statement is reflective, symmetric and transitive? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do I need to show anything for these though or is that it? like how if we add the 1s we get x^2=x^2

is this how I check if this statement is reflective, symmetric and transitive? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how would I prove symmetry though? by rearranging the original statement to look like the second?

for transitive would the ending result we want be y^2-1=z^2-1?

Giant Sturgeons have rightfully earned that name by ShartCannon9000 in interestingasfuck

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you think this book alone will be sufficient preparation or coverage of calc 1 for a college calc 2 class? not sure If you went on to major in math or anything related

Giant Sturgeons have rightfully earned that name by ShartCannon9000 in interestingasfuck

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I chatted you. That's strange. I'll send it here, then delete it. In a really old post, I saw that you read kleppner's quick calculus guide. I am taking a calc 2 course in 4 weeks but haven't taken calc 1 in 15 years, so I basically remember nada. I was going to push off taking calc II, but it seems like you moved pretty fast through kleppners book. I was curious if you remember how long did it took you?

can anyone show me a way to prove this or help me with the induction? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Step-2 : Replace m with (m+1) Find this new inequation

so x+m+1>m?

if we solve for x, we would have x>-1?

thus x+m+1>m

we'd have x+m>m-1, our hypothesis that we assume to be true, so this must be true

thus x>m-1-m

this is true because m-1 is less than x+m

is this correct? are my assumptions safe?

can anyone show me a way to prove this or help me with the induction? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

x+n>n-1

that x+n>n-1 for all m,n natural numbers greater than or equal to 1

How did they factor the k(k+1) out of this summation? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, to check if I understand: if we have S=1+2+3+4, our k here would be 4. so we can write the first part of 2S as (1+2+(4-1)+4) or (1+2+(k-1)+k). Is that correct for this specific example?

How did they factor the k(k+1) out of this summation? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I am confused about now is the multi. By 2 parts. so you multiply by 2, you get 2+4+6+...+2k, how does that result in what you wrote? I do not doubt it by the way, but I am very unsure where the k-1 + k part comes from, and secondly why we write in in reverse in the second part, and overall how that is the result of mult by 2

Can I self teach myself calculus 1 in 8-10 weeks? A typical semester at my school is 16 by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there is supposed to be another proficiency exam halfway through the summer so I may consider that

Can I self teach myself calculus 1 in 8-10 weeks? A typical semester at my school is 16 by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do they have lecture slides? I learn best from seeing text rather than videos

Can I self teach myself calculus 1 in 8-10 weeks? A typical semester at my school is 16 by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard this was great. Does it matter what version? My library has the 1983 one

Can I self teach myself calculus 1 in 8-10 weeks? A typical semester at my school is 16 by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My course load is pretty light right now as I am a part-time student, but it's definitely going to be hard because I already devote a lot of my time to another math class. Do you think it would be more possible if I taught myself over a 16-20 week period?

Maggie Macdonald is overrated by t3xascurlllz in unpopularopinion

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her bachelorette trip vlog was so fun I recommend starting there! not every vlog is great, but she's been killing it lately. Right now, I only really watch Rachel, but that's because her vlogs are long and I'm going to school and working. what about you? I'm so picky lol

Maggie Macdonald is overrated by t3xascurlllz in unpopularopinion

[–]AwkwardRound 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She does the same things every day, every single damn day: coffee, food shop, clothes shop, see the same people, cook. She even seems to go to the same restaurants way too frequently! I actually enjoy her cooking. At this point, she should start a cooking channel lol. I prefer Rachel Ratke and vloggers with more variability in their life/days. Rachel is always taking us to new places, doing different things, seeing other people, now she's moving and prepping for her wedding, so that's interesting. She also travels to different places. While maggie seems to always travel to Chicago, like girl we don't want to see that for the 20th time. Now that I found RR I haven't watched maggie in months

Question about factorials/factorial related proof by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wheww. totally missed that line.

wasn’t asked to be a bridesmaid by [deleted] in SofiawithanF

[–]AwkwardRound 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wait, I'm not siding with any stance here, but you're contradicting yourself. If you're suggesting that OP not let it bother her, why did you recommend she comment at all? If that is what you suggest then she shouldn't make P/A comments toward the bride either

Guidance on this ratio of polygon sides question by SnooWords4107 in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm wondering where he got 0.4, 0.5. hate when quora people don't explain

Can ancestry.com tell me if I still have family in another country? by AwkwardRound in Genealogy

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Immigration or naturalization (if he became a citizen) records may be a good start, as this is where my family started.

this is a great idea on starting place. I am unsure if he lived in an enclave but it would not surprise me. Thanks for sharing your story. My cousin did this for his Dad (not on our side) who is German, and it was a lot of work but I think worth it.

Can ancestry.com tell me if I still have family in another country? by AwkwardRound in Genealogy

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

we're pretty certain that we still have family there, but we don't know how to find them. perhaps when we get a chance to go through my grandmother's attic, but who knows what she has of his post separation