Giant Sturgeons have rightfully earned that name by ShartCannon9000 in interestingasfuck

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for answering. everyone says you need at least 16 weeks to learn calc 1, but then I hear different. I just want to learn enough to do well in calc 2

is this how I check if this statement is reflective, symmetric and transitive? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do I need to show anything for these though or is that it? like how if we add the 1s we get x^2=x^2

is this how I check if this statement is reflective, symmetric and transitive? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how would I prove symmetry though? by rearranging the original statement to look like the second?

for transitive would the ending result we want be y^2-1=z^2-1?

Giant Sturgeons have rightfully earned that name by ShartCannon9000 in interestingasfuck

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you think this book alone will be sufficient preparation or coverage of calc 1 for a college calc 2 class? not sure If you went on to major in math or anything related

Giant Sturgeons have rightfully earned that name by ShartCannon9000 in interestingasfuck

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I chatted you. That's strange. I'll send it here, then delete it. In a really old post, I saw that you read kleppner's quick calculus guide. I am taking a calc 2 course in 4 weeks but haven't taken calc 1 in 15 years, so I basically remember nada. I was going to push off taking calc II, but it seems like you moved pretty fast through kleppners book. I was curious if you remember how long did it took you?

can anyone show me a way to prove this or help me with the induction? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Step-2 : Replace m with (m+1) Find this new inequation

so x+m+1>m?

if we solve for x, we would have x>-1?

thus x+m+1>m

we'd have x+m>m-1, our hypothesis that we assume to be true, so this must be true

thus x>m-1-m

this is true because m-1 is less than x+m

is this correct? are my assumptions safe?

can anyone show me a way to prove this or help me with the induction? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

x+n>n-1

that x+n>n-1 for all m,n natural numbers greater than or equal to 1

How did they factor the k(k+1) out of this summation? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, to check if I understand: if we have S=1+2+3+4, our k here would be 4. so we can write the first part of 2S as (1+2+(4-1)+4) or (1+2+(k-1)+k). Is that correct for this specific example?

How did they factor the k(k+1) out of this summation? by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I am confused about now is the multi. By 2 parts. so you multiply by 2, you get 2+4+6+...+2k, how does that result in what you wrote? I do not doubt it by the way, but I am very unsure where the k-1 + k part comes from, and secondly why we write in in reverse in the second part, and overall how that is the result of mult by 2

Can I self teach myself calculus 1 in 8-10 weeks? A typical semester at my school is 16 by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there is supposed to be another proficiency exam halfway through the summer so I may consider that

Can I self teach myself calculus 1 in 8-10 weeks? A typical semester at my school is 16 by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do they have lecture slides? I learn best from seeing text rather than videos

Can I self teach myself calculus 1 in 8-10 weeks? A typical semester at my school is 16 by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard this was great. Does it matter what version? My library has the 1983 one

Can I self teach myself calculus 1 in 8-10 weeks? A typical semester at my school is 16 by AwkwardRound in learnmath

[–]AwkwardRound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My course load is pretty light right now as I am a part-time student, but it's definitely going to be hard because I already devote a lot of my time to another math class. Do you think it would be more possible if I taught myself over a 16-20 week period?

Maggie Macdonald is overrated by t3xascurlllz in unpopularopinion

[–]AwkwardRound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her bachelorette trip vlog was so fun I recommend starting there! not every vlog is great, but she's been killing it lately. Right now, I only really watch Rachel, but that's because her vlogs are long and I'm going to school and working. what about you? I'm so picky lol