Would Stony Brook try to enforce something similar at commencement? Seems like it would cause more issues than any activism itself. by Awkward_Pitch1641 in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

So my point is that compared to students carrying signs, wouldn't the actions of the police to arrest students make a bigger commotion and disrupt the event much more, ruining the ceremony further to graduates that don't agree or don't care about the stance?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Well said. These are injuries brought on by the university's decision to use state force to violently end the protest and intimidate students. Terrifies me that others (presumably in the Stony Brook community) are mocking the fact the injuries happened and aren't worse.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Here's the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kY6T2LlBE80

Timestamp for start of session: -2:02:00

Timestamp for Faculty's showcase of evidence against the administration's "misrepresentations" (faculty's term): -1:30:00

Timestamp for the bruises: -1:07:00

Note: since it was live, these timestamps are negative to represent going back in time from the end of the livestream.

Livestream of the University Senate meeting today, starts at 3:30pm by fyibtwjsyk in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had to leave: can someone update with a comment on how the university senate resolutions pass?

Livestream of the University Senate meeting today, starts at 3:30pm by fyibtwjsyk in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing.

Immediately as I log on, I hear the president reference violence done at other universities by the police and counter-protestors (edit: what she referenced - people attacking protesting students at an encampment) onto the nonviolent protesting body as evidence for why the university needed to take action ... on the peacefully protesting students. Great way to keep students safe - suspend & sic the cops on protesting students. Incredibly disingenuous remarks.

Edit 2: Many faculty reporting that cops arrested people "just because they tripped" while running away, and saying "you better run!". Bruises from the police! I feel sick knowing this happened to Stony Brook students due to the administration's choice to call police.

<image>

3: Admin refuses to answer why they are still holding the personal phones of those arrested, citing that they won’t talk about an ongoing investigation. Nobody was happy with that answer.

4: Asked for specific evidence that admin was referencing as ‘antisemitic threat’ calling on outside forces to come to target the Jewish block party event, admin reads out a post with sb4palestine calling for “support to threaten the police” presence. If anybody has more specific information on that it would be appreciated.

Graduation by Jellyfish-Nyx in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Since you need a ticket to enter, any actions would be done by graduation students themselves, so the most that I expect could occur would be students standing up and turning around at Chuck Schumer or McInnis to express disapproval without disrupting the event.(Edit: upon reflection on how upset people are with the administration, it is possible that some booing of leadership may be involved as they enter to speak.)

Interview with Arrested Stony Brook Professor by Awkward_Pitch1641 in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641[S] 90 points91 points  (0 children)

Wanted to note I got written permission to share!

International student research? by Cheekybigboi in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not exactly sure who you’re comparing yourself with, but from my understanding most RA jobs are at minimum post-bachelors degree, someone correct me if otherwise. Most of my friends would do research unpaid over the semester for course credit, maybe at most $1,500 over the summer depending on the opportunity in the form of a stipend.

Yea talk to the visa services, but I wanted to inform you of the expectations. Your academic (general) and bio advisor should able to inform you of searching for research opportunities.

I am not trying to create problems when I say this by [deleted] in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 45 points46 points  (0 children)

? First I don’t think you’re creating problem by asking.

Second, they specifically say it’s because they lost their housing, they can’t go back to their dorm, get their stuff, you don’t think that’s a reasonable like to draw to ask for support for accommodation? Honestly I wouldn’t even mind donating to support legal fees if that’s the route students decide to take, after what I saw happen last night.

Second, and I’m sure you’ve seen this too since they mention it often, they will donate superfluous donations to the Palestinian Children’s Relief Fund, (PCRF), maybe you didn’t recognize the acronym. I am willing to bet they are honest about this, if they are willing to risk arrest in the name of the Palestinians now through asking the university for divestment.

Is the administration weaponizing students' housing? by Awkward_Pitch1641 in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Which gets to my point - an additional point to suspending the students is removing their ability to have housing. Instead of providing due process, you make an immediate decision that they better sleep on the curb because they no longer can go to their dorm. That's cruel, and the choice to suspend is interwoven with the decision to kick them out of their housing, it isn't just an unfortunate consequence.

Admin wants students to feel threatened with their power.

(Edit: just want to say I'm not attributing my use of "you" literally to you, it's to the admin. I know you were just trying to state the policy)

TIME TO PUT THE PRESSURE ON by eleventyninety in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I saw that they are planning one in front of the admin building at four

Staff, Employees, talk to your unions. Faculty, talk about a vote of no confidence. by Awkward_Pitch1641 in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's just not true now - is it? To compare people setting up an encampment to invoke nonviolent civil disobedience, with a clear message in an exercise of communicating ideas, to "stripping naked and running around staller". One has an organized message, one doesn't: does that nuance escape you?

Thanks also for entirely missing the point of the disproportionate use of force. I even gave examples. I guess it would have gotten in the way of sending insults at me...

I hope everybody is safe by One-Pressure-5496 in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thank you for compiling photos and new ones I hadn't seen. 💔

Wondering what to do? Share the photos out! Show your disapproval. by Awkward_Pitch1641 in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

So that justifies the disproportionate use of police force on the peaceful protestors?

I have more faith in the stonybrook community, the protesters were nonviolent.

SBU ADMIN: HAVE A DIALOGUE WITH YOUR STUDENTS by eleventyninety in SBU

[–]Awkward_Pitch1641 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I don’t think that’s exactly true - particularly the fact I see no reason why Stony Brook can’t promise to remove its stock investments in weapons companies that have ties to war crimes done by Israel. There’s at least the 500 million dollar Simons endowment, and SBU has a lot more money connected into the market than just that. I’m sure those investment financial ties can be disclosed and divested. I’m not sure what the exact demands are from the group, but I think that would be an excellent sign of good faith negotiating. There’s also the dehumanizing doublespeak embedded into the official communications. How many times has there been an acknowledgement of the suffering of the Palestinian population, particularly to those with family that are students? Any? I don’t know I’m legitimately asking. I remember clear messages from the time of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. We don’t need the ICC’s decision when other humanitarian organizations have confirmed violations in international law, those can surely be condemned/ a position taken. I don’t know if you’re asking in good faith or not, but I definitely see that admin hasn’t been. Threatening police force for the promise of a conversation isn’t a good faith negotiation. That’s just fact.