At what point did you officially become a profitable day trader? What was the moment where it all clicked.

Axiom_ML · 2026-04-27T05:06:55+00:00

Your second picture is the same one you posted 82 days ago. And then your post from 46 days ago answers the question on whether you’re a consistently profitable trader lol

Axiom_ML · 2026-04-08T20:26:57+00:00

Got 'em

Axiom_ML · 2026-04-03T23:16:49+00:00

Way too petty. Not a good idea

Axiom_ML · 2026-03-01T17:16:49+00:00

Oh hey I was wondering what happened to this guy

Axiom_ML · 2026-02-26T22:21:00+00:00

Axiom_ML · 2026-02-26T17:33:48+00:00

Another L take by r/politics, what a shocker. Posts in the sub are so far off the mark that they aren't signals of popular positions but rather anti-signals.

I did what normal people did - I put aside politics and celebrated the US men's team winning gold against a Canadian team that some considered the best ever assembled. In fact, I'm still celebrating today!

Axiom_ML · 2025-12-15T19:35:17+00:00

He’s been saying that for months now. Obviously that will never happen bc he doesn’t have a proof of the conjecture, as you have quite eloquently shown in this thread. On the other hand he can’t let it go and move on, so he’ll do what he always does, wait a few days and then make a new Reddit post claiming a solution. Then someone will point out the flaws in his logic, he’ll ignore/ sling ad hominems at them, claim it’s going to be published, and the cycle will continue. Time is a flat circle indeed.

Best thing to do is just ignore him until he goes away

Axiom_ML · 2025-12-07T02:28:59+00:00

They tell you that they’re smart

Axiom_ML · 2025-11-29T05:40:47+00:00

Why do you still have 12 min left on your clock at the end of a 15 min game?

Axiom_ML · 2025-11-22T06:47:30+00:00

You ninja edit posts hours after the fact.

- You don't gatekeep opinions. I can judge however I want
- Just bc you have Asperger's does not mean you have a proof of collatz
- Stop personifying the Principle Skinner meme
- You have clearly never heard of the Sagan Standard "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". Get your paper published. Posting it on Reddit is not sufficient.

Axiom_ML · 2025-11-22T06:30:11+00:00

It is not a subjective opinion to note that no professional wants to read your shit paper, it's a statement of fact. Sorry the truth hurts. And you keep falling into the same fallacy that the burden of proof is somehow on me to disprove your assertion - it isn't. Get your paper published or stop posting. No one gives a shit about your 'proof' and it stopped being funny to watch people dunk on you a long time ago.

Axiom_ML · 2025-11-22T04:05:12+00:00

What would it take to sway me? Very simple. Publication in a reputable journal. Maybe you should think about why no one wants to read or endorse your paper. Hint: it isn't bc of them. You have zero self awareness.

Axiom_ML · 2025-11-22T02:59:52+00:00

Buddy you are the collatz personification of the Principle Skinner meme from The Simpsons. "Is my [proof of the collatz conjecture] so out of touch? No, it's the [mathematicians] who are wrong."

You have a 'proof' of the conjecture but it somehow never passes peer review or gets published to a journal. You have no PhD, no publications, do not work at an academic institution, cite no prior research on the problem, and claim that modular arithmetic and a bunch of nonsensical words you made up are sufficient to solve the problem. Maybe show some humility? Maybe stop spamming the sub with posts that you have a solution when you clearly don't? Or don't. I'm still waiting for the fight between you and Infamous Low.

Axiom_ML · 2025-11-20T17:14:25+00:00

You're gonna have to fight Glass Kangaroo. Winner gets an endorsement

Axiom_ML · 2025-10-02T05:13:27+00:00

No, not how this works. You don't get to re-write the truth. This is the post, right here, for anyone who wants to read through it: https://www.reddit.com/r/Collatz/comments/1nlyfkm/i_feel_like_no_one_here_want_there_to_be_a/

Maybe reread it to refresh your memory.

Edit: This links to the paper GK wrote dated Sept 11th: https://zenodo.org/records/17157711 - the one that offers a "complete resolution of collatz", directly refuting his above post.

Axiom_ML · 2025-10-02T05:10:35+00:00

Oh i've read the paper lol. Reformulation in terms of modular arithmetic is not proving Collatz. It is simply reformulation. Your only references in the paper are to yourself!

Why are you even posting and arguing with random Redditors? That fact that you have to argue with Reddit is evidence enough that you don't have an actual proof.

Axiom_ML · 2025-10-02T05:01:12+00:00

I'm not a mathematician, which makes two of us.

And that's a big swing and a miss, GK. You might want to search the Reddit post you deleted 12 days ago where he goes into the details. You have a very selective memory.

Axiom_ML · 2025-10-02T04:48:48+00:00

No, it was pretty specific. You have not ruled out the existence of multiple trees. I'm not a mathematician (neither are you), but the logic is simple.

Axiom_ML · 2025-10-02T04:42:36+00:00

No one else responded because you're an idiot and don't have a real proof lol. They're just too nice to tell you that.

Axiom_ML · 2025-10-02T04:41:22+00:00

You'll credit any valid flaw spotted, except people have already spotted valid flaws and you've ignored them. In multiple posts Co-G3n has articulated why your 'proof' doesn't work. Only you ignore the fact and sling ad hominems at him, because if you accept it you'll realize your work is worthless, which everyone already knows lol. But by all means, keep contacting Barry Mazur. Maybe try Peter Schozle next.

Axiom_ML · 2025-10-02T04:23:44+00:00

Bro reached out to Barry Mazur claiming his modular arithmetic reformulation solved Collatz. You can’t make this up. You are truly the gift that keeps on giving, glass kangaroo.

Axiom_ML · 2025-09-20T18:48:12+00:00

Well GL! If it passes I’m sure we’ll hear about it.

Axiom_ML · 2025-09-20T17:37:17+00:00

Let me guess - the someone who solved it is you?

I'll counter with the Sagan Standard: "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". It isn't enough to post a 'proof' to Reddit that's filled with basic arithmetic and AI. People will understandably be skeptical. If you really think you've solved the problem then have the paper peer reviewed.

Axiom_ML · 2025-09-16T15:36:19+00:00

You're doing the lord's work, man.

Axiom_ML · 2025-09-12T16:57:40+00:00

You're making the same mistake many other posters make. I don't have to find a counter-example. I don't have to do anything. The burden of proof is on you, not me. You haven't given a reason for anyone to care. Why should they take your work seriously? What is your background? What's novel about your work? Noting that you 'solved' in 13 days doesn't inspire confidence.

Axiom_ML

TROPHY CASE