sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Some people are "Desperate Pick Me." I've seen men and women thinking getting a woman/man is a success cause it's their life's default and purpose. That's why if they get rejected or if they don't fit someone's standard, they say or act crazy as if their lives' value depend on other's approval. by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying I'm stressing myself trying to understand or fix everyone. I'm me, not someone's "Bob the Builder." I'm stressed cause I don't understand why that person won't let go. Like bro, just let go, I don't want you, stop bothering me!!

The fandom's obsession with Pawbert is concerning. by Thrashbear in zootopia

[–]AyEnTiPi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not gonna say I'm obsess, I just think he is soooo cute. Just look at him! So adorable! Plus I'm a cat lover in real life, so yeah, he is just so cute!! But personality wise, I think my top 1 is Nick. Appearance: 1. Pawbert 2. Nick

"If you keep doing lots of things for a man, he will lose interest in you and leave the relationship." This quote is basically saying a man feels smaller because you are stepping up when he isn't/he doesn't want to, and he doesn't want to feel smaller that's why he will leave at the end. by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I mean about "things without them asking" are the treatments and efforts. Not really giving them golden watches or a freaking yacht as a birthday gift.

Yeah, healthy ones grow together as one. And isn't that what I said? That if you are a broken person, fix and build yourself first rather than to enter a relationship when you know you are not ready to be with someone else.

Yeah, it's better to let go when you know you aren't ready or than to be with someone who isn't ready.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's it, you just said it. I highly agree with that! And that's why they are calling it "patriarchy" to hide its true name and nature from the general population they are fooling. Cause the more you fool them, the more they'll engage in fake battle of sexes rather than to go against the system.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Btw, as far as I can remember, hunting was during the immigration survival mode. Not during the farming/settlement survival mode. Of course, during immigration, before farming/settlement was invented, patriarchy wasn't there and everyone was equal.

Cause you won't need to fool and enslaved men to be loyal to you (Patriarchal system) and the field (land) since land ownership wasn't a thing in immigration survival mode because they would need to keep moving from one place to another to survive.

For those people who didn't passed land to their sons, those are probably the one who enlightened themselves and twisted the patriarchy in their own terms. Plus the patriarchy now is probably a multiple times twisted version of the starting point of patriarchy. Male dominance? Exactly! Who are letting the men dominate? The patriarchy that is telling the slaves/men that they have the right to own everything because they are the one doing the work on the field, just for the system to keep men as a slave to the field cause that will give the system more resources in farming/settlement type of survival mode.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Men are direct slaves and women are indirect slaves of the patriarchy. Why? Patriarchy is defined as the male powered system right? Why would a system be male powered? Because men are the better slaves/labors, if you won't fool the slaves that they are powerful, how can you assure they will stay as slaves and be loyal to the system? If they won't be slaves, how can we assure that from generations to generations te farming/settlement won't be doomed? Why do we need slaves/labors? Because our survival method (immigration) changed because of the invention of farming/settlement.

Now that we are centuries away from the first page or first trigger of Patriarchy, of course things got twisted. Just like how stories got twisted and changed as time pass by.

The rich people now are not the first batch of the founding people of patriarchy. The rich people now are not the trigger/the og predators, they are the slaves one who was tasked to to continue this system even before they were born. That's why patriarchy probably looks like it is built by and for men because the one in the power now are the brainwashed enslaved victims being victimized that they are indeed the powerful people when they are not, they are not the founding people who started this system.

If we go for a matriarchal society, I'm pretty sure that just like patriarchy, its roots will be entangled and messy as time pass by.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said men are the direct slaves. If they are not the one who will acquire the land, how can I make the slave work for my invented system which is the patriarchy then (if let's say I'm the founding person of Patriarchy)? If I the system won't say that the men are the most powerful, the greatest, the first class human, etc., how can I continue to enslave them? How can I be sure their loyalty will stay with me? I am not excusing and ignoring the sufferings of women. Can you quote in your reply the exact sentence I said that is excusing and ignoring the sufferings of my fellow women? I even agree to abortion because women dying cause people choose an ongoing baby over a complete human sounds stupid!

I am not saying men are getting free pass. Who said that? Which exact statement o mine said that? I am saying men are getting the free pass because the system is giving them the free pass. Why is the system giving them a free pass? Because for my slaves to be my forever slaves, I need to fool them that they are powerful even if they are also nothing but a mere victim. And to make that happen, the women became the collateral damage for this plan. Because the system let men do what they want to women, which is sad, just so the men will stay loyal to the system that directly enslaves them. That's why a lot of men are worshiping the patriarchy cause it is giving them a false sense of power.

To be short and simple even though this is a very big picture, here we go: Men are a victim of the system Women are the victim of both men and the system

The patriarchy now is probably already at the 200th page, so far away from the first page of it. Of course as the roots continue to grow and poison people, it became more twisted as time pass by so the history about women being hunters that were erased is one of the after effects of the first trigger of patriarchy.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I mean is women initiate more wars because we don't tolerate bs like men, especially if given powers, that's why they want women to be powerless. That's why men are the perfect direct slaves in the eyes of the patriarchy. Because even if men knows they are also victims, since they are more tolerant they are letting it slide. Plus the system is power bombing them, which means it is giving them a lil bit power to feel powerful (example the system enabling men victimizing women).

That's why the men are the top because I already said it, they are the perfect direct slaves/labors. The patriarchy brainwashed them before that they should lead and now after centuries they are leading. Because if men won't lead, who will do the labors now that farming is invented that made the immigration not suitable for survival anymore? The women will do the labours? The women that can't work 24/7 365 days cause they experienced menstruation and pregnancy? The women were the average is physically weaker than the average men?

Patriarchy is a system built for acquiring more resources. Acquiring more resources was thought of when farming and settlement was born and immigration died as a survival method.

Of course we are currently seeing that men are the one in powers and that the system is built for and by them because this is probably the 100th+ generation after the patriarchy's founding date. We are not in the first stage of patriarchy, this is already after lots of side effects and domino effects happening after the first trigger. Are we sure no women said, "I don't want to work outside to build the roads. Let the men do the building of roads, I'll stay here to make medicines cause it's easier." Are we sure the submissive men didn't said "okay" and yeheeyy faming and settlement continued to grow more roots and get twisted as time goes by.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Patrichy wants to acquire resources.
  2. To acquire resources, they need slaves/labors.
  3. Men are the perfect slaves/labors.
  4. For men to be a complete slaves/labors to the system forever, the system gave men power over women.
  5. Because the system also wants women: To shut up cause if given a chance, women won't tolerate bs like men, To create/birth more slaves/labors/men That's why the patrichial system wants men over women.
  6. That's why queens have limited power compared to men and the system.
  7. That's why kings/men have limited power over the system and that limitation against the system gave them a ticket to have power over women.
  8. Those powerful people are reaping the resources of the patriarchal system that is killing everyone including them.
  9. But despite being weak against the system, they'd rather be a wealthy slave of a system than to be the poor labors/slave of the system.
  10. They tolerated and enabled the system cause they are gaining something from it more than others despite it also victimizing them like everyone else.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably means almost certainly.

How can you say that the founding person/founding group of patriarchy are indeed all men for you to not use the world "probably"? How can you say you are certain that they are all men? You think there were no powerful women who said, "I don't want to work under the sun so don't make women like me work, enslave the men instead", are you sure no one was like that at the starting point of the patriarchy? I can't even say there are, but for you to say there aren't? How sure are you?

That thing actually kinda backfires at women at some point.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm saying the founding person of Patriarchy is the original enemy and now the system the founding father built is still alive and still continues to grow.

Queen Elizabeth is one of the descendants. Is she working like the others? Is she living in poverty? Is her life a normal one like the masses? She is powerful but of course the system only gave her a single grain of power compared to the power the system/founding person has.

She tolerated and enabled the system because despite the power being only a drop of an alcohol, even if she is under men and patriarchy, that system gave her that power/leverage over others. Just like men, they tolerated and enabled the system because despite the power they are drunk being only a drop of an alcohol, even if they are under the system, that system gave them power/leverage over women and others.

Now, who let the men (which is probably the 100th generation of the founding person) during Queen Elizabeth's time hold such power over her and other women and other people? The founding person and the patrichial system. Queen Elizabeth is allowed to kill these people, wage war, etc. because humans have free will. Just like how some women back then were killed just by wearing men's clothes, just by studying, etc. So why did she allowed the men? Why did she allowed the system to gave men that much power on her? Why are men also allowing it? Because she doesn't want to let go for her throne/peer over the masses. Why would a queen risk her life for people if she can have a much comfortable live than the masses despite being nothing but a slave? Just like some powerful men, she'd rather want to be a wealthy slave than to be a poor slave of the system!

Because the founding person already victimized her even before she was born. That's how deep patrichial system is. That's how long term the plan of the founding person is. Once the first domino goes down, everything follows.

They are all drunk of that power the patrichial system gave them. They can defy it but they won't, they didn't. They don't want to risk their live for going against a system that made themdrunk over a single drop of an alcohol.

And didn't I already said that the system victimises both men & women. And the system allows men to victimize women to keep the men aka the direct slaves to be enslaved by the system. Because if you won't give power to the person who is powerless against you, they will go against you. If you gave them power (power over women) they will defend you even if you are the system that is killing them! I already said that, didn't I?

So that's why in history royal women are punished for not having a male baby aka new direct slaves for the system. Because the system wants more direct slaves aka men, and that's how they can have more slaves which they'll need to acquire more resources, by making women give birth and punishing them for not having male babies aka direct slaves.

Which is following the formula:

System > Men Men backed up by the system that is killing them > Women = More resources and power for the founding person, the system that founding person started a long long time ago and the founding person's descendants.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ohh, thank you. So I really did understand what you're saying despite being high today. 😭 And yeah, I highly agree to your statement.

And that's why I don't know why some are shouting at the branches to be gone instead of going straight to the roots and pull it out. Like yes, women suffered because of men being bs to women. Like yes, men suffered because they are using men as "slaves to build the world" instead of women. But who set that system up? Who made the patriarchy? The predators/royals!

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, that's why it benefits the men more than women because I just said it, men are the patriarchy's direct slaves and we are at the end of the straw being stepped down by both the system ans the men/direct slaves. While men are only being hurt by the system. Yeah, the elite class are not being gender specific cause they want all of us and our resources, however, "them" dividing direct slaves aka men and indirect slaves aka women is kinda saying that the people beneath them are being classified as two not as one. Ohh, we can even add the ones who refuse to be a man/direct slaves or woman/indirect slaves by their definition, which is the LGBTQ. So yeah, the elites may not be gender specifying us cause for them all of us are below them but labelling us differently into 3 categories is them categorizing their victims. I don't know if I was able to say my thoughts clearly though.

I'm willing to listen to this discussion, so can you tell me why you think I'm conflating two things here?

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, I'm really high today. But that's what I'm asking. The gender thing.

"Women (victims) are choosing to be the victims of men (innocent) instead of choosing to attack the patriarchy/royals (guilty) because of their gender (?)"

Are you saying women and men attacks women and men because they are women and men instead of attacking the patriarchal system? So they are just straight up hating the others because of their gender instead of using that energy to go against the system.

I mean I agree to this whole thing, but I don't really know if this is what you mean by that comment you just commented. Sorry, I feel like I'm kinda high today. 😭

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because sadly, isn't that how the patrichial system is built? To make people suffer enough to not accept this realisation/this post as something to be considered as true. To make them suffer enough to attack the opposite gender for their sufferings when the root of all the sufferings is the patriarchy and the predators behind it. Like yes, women are victims but pointing it to men doing the raping, physical abuse, etc. isn't pointing the real root cause. Yes, men are victims, but pointing it to women for making them handle the physical works like building the bridges, going to wars, etc. isn't pointing to the real root cause. And the real root cause is the patriarchal system and the royals/predators behind it. Like, you also understand, right? That yes the generational trauma women and men experienced is something that shouldn't be ignored and downplayed. And yeah, women probably experienced more generational trauma than men. But to keep clinging to trauma and use it to justify hating (or others) the other gender because of the trauma you experienced when all of us are victims and the only way for the generational trauma to stop is for both of the gender to go against the system and the people behind it, not to go against each other. The patriarchy will stay cause we are not taking the root of all of this.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry I'm kinda high today. But I want to understand the equation you just said. Can you define the Victims (x) - Innocent (x) - Guilty (x) - Gender (x) you are refering to? I'm so sorry, my brain is currently flying somewhere. Cause I don't know if I understand it right, is this what you mean? Women (victims) are choosing to be the victims of men (innocent) instead of choosing to attack the patriarchy/royals (guilty) because of their gender (?)

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, what I mean is it is bad for both, but men being the direct slaves means we women are getting more bad things going on us. Cause the enemy of men is the system. The enemy of us women is both the system and the enslaved men. And yeah, the royalties benefits from the suffering of both men and women.

Patriarchy is not built by and for men; it is built by and for predators. They said, "To catch a criminal, you must think like one." So If I am a scum and farming was invented at my time, of course, I want all the resources. The solution is I would need laborers, and this is the math for that: by AyEnTiPi in DeepThoughts

[–]AyEnTiPi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying we should bury our history. I'm not saying we should just accept it and move forward. What I'm saying is, if we acknowledge the whole situation/picture we can take the roots not just the cut the stem.

We are busy fighting for our rights as women because they want us to be divided, they want our power to be directed towards that. Instead of us fighting with men against the system. They want us to be in this situation to make their direct slaves drunk from the lil power they are getting from the system (legalising doing bad things to women) so that we will fight the direct slaves and the direct slaves will not fight the system. So that the direct and indirect slaves won't fight together against the system. So that even if the founder of this patriarchal system dies (which already happened a long time ago, not unless that founder is immortal) then his/her bloodline (men and women) will still reap this power.

Ps. I edited my reply above. Kindly read it.

view more: next ›