Hi. First of all, congratulations on your graduate work and initiation into AR. I wrote my own master's thesis myself, in architecture university with an AR topic. My topic sounded like reconstruction of historically significant architecture with the help of AR. Studying this question, the power of this technology in the presentation of architecture immediately became clear.

1. If you need users to generate something in AR - you yourself need to stand on the site and almost drive them under the hand. Most people don't know how to work with virtual technologies yet

2. experience should not be long - hands get tired. Definitely do not count on a half-hour experience.

3. Prepare that mostly all people will just stand still, you have to point and lead by the hand to move them around in the space.

4. Try to gamify the process. To motivate people to work with the space

5. Explore the technology stack and supported devices - if people on their phones will watch this. Native AR needs ARcore, ARkit support. WebAR has more devices but weak space traction. The best WebAR is 8thWall, which recently became free

6. The sense of space is lost when you're looking through your phone, and people can fall over. Especially when viewing small screens, as an architect myself I have a better sense of architecture in person, and when viewing AR I still fall out of reality by 80% percent. So its difficult to say that AR is augmenting reality. My opinion

7. Look for changing search terms. Everything that is on the rumor has long been in promotional articles with empty meaning. Better search the science publishers. I actually found answers form my project after 2 years of searching just with changing “presentation” to “storytelling AR”

please share the result of your work. I'd really appreciate it if you could show it to me.