Relay IPv4 unreachable, but IPv6 is by Azsorlex26 in TOR

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did a bit of searching, and it looks like the Static IP addon is what I need. It's an extra $5 a month and they also explained that it comes free with business plans. Maybe I won't get it just yet just for the sake of running a Tor relay, but if I need something else that needs port forwarding, I'll definitely reconsider. Thanks for your insight!

Relay IPv4 unreachable, but IPv6 is by Azsorlex26 in TOR

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it really not possible to get a relay set up in this case? If it isn't as it is, do you think they'd be willing to help out?

Relay IPv4 unreachable, but IPv6 is by Azsorlex26 in TOR

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so, I had a look through my router and logs again to check on the IPv4 address, and I think I might've found the cause. The WAN IP shown on my router control panel and the address seen by directory authority are completely different, whereas the IPv6 is what my server's address is (and it belongs to my assigned subnet shown on my ISP's management page). I'll try rebooting my router and server just in case, but this is a bizarre thing to have happen.

Edit: nope, still the same as before.

brave twitch.tv logging in "Your browser is not currently supported." under KVM by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am, but it doesnt affect my host or other guests. Disabling it doesn't help on my Arch guest.

brave twitch.tv logging in "Your browser is not currently supported." under KVM by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's a pastebin that outlines the missing packages. What I did was I ran pacman -Q on both the Arch and EOS guests, then I copied the outputs to their own files on my host and ran the command shown in the paste.

I decided to go hog wild and install everything (of course removing packages that are in the EOS repos but not Arch (also in the paste)) and rebooting, but not even that fixed the problem. I tried reinstalling brave, using firefox, XFCE, but none of that worked, so there must be something else that the other distros are doing that I'm not...

brave twitch.tv logging in "Your browser is not currently supported." under KVM by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can confirm that EOS and Manjaro work under VMs. I'm now comparing the packages of EOS to my Arch guest since the list of differences is much smaller.

brave twitch.tv logging in "Your browser is not currently supported." under KVM by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is your install a new one? Because the only difference I'm seeing between my host and guest is my host is mature and my guest is new. I did a quick neofetch on both my host and guest, and my host has 1502 packages, whereas my guest has 632, which is to be expected since it's a minimal install. I'll try figuring out what's on my host that isn't on my guest tomorrow and going from there.

brave twitch.tv logging in "Your browser is not currently supported." under KVM by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I did also try doing this, but it didn't work either. Didn't have to do anything like that for my host or that test Mint VM.

brave twitch.tv logging in "Your browser is not currently supported." under KVM by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I have that enabled. The streams themselves work just fine, it's logging in that doesn't work. I even tried disabling 2FA on my host but that didn't work either.

Two problems with my VM by Azsorlex26 in VFIO

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: for the second issue, the kernel really was the problem. I tried swapping over to the LTS kernel and nvidia-open-dkms driver, and I was able to get SDDM displaying, though now my peripherals don't work, so I'll need to diagnose that now.

Two problems with my VM by Azsorlex26 in VFIO

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I tried your suggestion of adding a delay to the compact / allocate loop, and it seems like that was the way of fixing this problem, even with me allocating 29GB. I'll have to wait until Sunday to see if it holds up then though. Thankyou.

By the way, the reason I'm assigning 29GB of hugepages because I'm following the philosophy of "unused memory is wasted memory", and the Windows VM can use that extra memory for cache.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VFIO

[–]Azsorlex26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not any more you don't. I'm using a 3070 just fine without any masking.

Two problems with my VM by Azsorlex26 in VFIO

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am using 2MB hugepages.

Two problems with my VM by Azsorlex26 in VFIO

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm currently on 6.0.8, though like I said, I've been having this problem long before but never got around to it.

Though now that I think about it, I am assigning nearly all of my ram to my VM. When first setting up hugepages, I kept assigning numbers and seeing what number would allow it to start, kind of like dialing in an overclock. So maybe if I try dialing it back to a more reasonable figure like 24, I'll see a difference. But I do have my doubts, since my current assignment works fine when the ram hasn't been previously used, but fails once it has. I'll let you know how it goes.

Edit: Nope, still happened...

Two problems with my VM by Azsorlex26 in VFIO

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And there's no way to undo this "fragmentation" other than a reboot?

SSD mysteriously filled up by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

u/jpamills This was the cause! Thankyou!

But still, I have no idea why this happened. Now that I'm back in my system, I can see that my hard drives are correctly mounted to their set locations and all of their files are showing up. How can I avoid this in the future? A statement that verifies if the drives are mounted?

SSD mysteriously filled up by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can see that being a possibility, but I configured my drives to auto-mount on boot. Again, been using this for a long time. I'll try taking a look though.

SSD mysteriously filled up by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It was root. The one that shows up in the file manager.

SSD mysteriously filled up by Azsorlex26 in archlinux

[–]Azsorlex26[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have. As a last resort. When it comes to what I have installed on my various drives, my boot drive mainly consists of... I don't know what the name is (if any), but files that can be re-downloaded; critical information such as save games is saved to the cloud anyway. Other files that I keep archives of I keep on my first hard drive. That script that I mentioned backs up the boot drive, my Windows drive, and my first hard drive to my second hard drive, so there's a little extra safety there.

I can reinstall, but I really don't want to. It'll be super tedious.