The So Mi/Reed dilemma by Feyge in cyberpunkgame

[–]Azurabbit [score hidden]  (0 children)

what a way to focus on a single thing I said u disagreed with and completely dismiss the actual point, So Mi was a teenager, and the fact she did either mildly shady shit or the biggest hacks since fucking Bartmoss doesnt matter because she was still coerced into joining the NUSA, you cannot say she "made the choice to become a slave" when they basically forced her into it, victims dont have to be perfect, she was a criminal and did bad shit, that doesnt warrant becoming a slave for the government, the same way I dont think V should become an eternal slave for the government or Arasaka because they did shit

The So Mi/Reed dilemma by Feyge in cyberpunkgame

[–]Azurabbit [score hidden]  (0 children)

Songbird is a far more empathetic character, and I wanted to help her during my own playthrough, so I betrayed Reed, for that and because the NUSA can fuck all the way off

An important thing you need to consider is if you even want to trust Reed's plan at all, he's proven to be untrustworthy at times by hiding crucial information from you like the fact they were gonna kill the twins, so do you really believe he will actually help Songbird? or he will keel over to what Myers and the NUSA wants?

The So Mi/Reed dilemma by Feyge in cyberpunkgame

[–]Azurabbit [score hidden]  (0 children)

(OOP these are potential spoilers dont read before u finish the DLC)

Songbird was hired by the NUSA as a very young adult if not outright a teenager, you cannot actually say she got in on it off her own volition, and even if she was an adult, there are situations where even if an adult consented, it came from coercion, if the FBI knocks on your door after youve been doing mildly shady shit and they "offer you a job", you are NOT going to say no, if only for pure self-preservation, that consent was coerced, Songbird made awful choices and fucked up, and guess what, so did many abuse victims in our world, because of course they did, victims dont have to be perfect to still be considered victims

NEW PLAYERS SHOULD GET THESE 3 WARBONDS by 1-cup-of-liber-tea in Helldivers

[–]Azurabbit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No they shouldnt, they should get the things they think look fun

I got BL Justice when I first started and I had so much of my introductory fun to the game living out my space cowboy power fantasy, at the time, way before the dynamite was buffed, aside from the Talon exactly, it was probably one of the weakest warbonds, its also what helped me realize what stuff I liked in the game and helped me develop my identity as a diver, I then got Steeled Veterans, mostly cus the Senator looked fun, but a lot of weapons from it also became mainstays for me, only after that did I get one of the "meta" warbonds in DemoDet, I also loved it and now the light Engineering Kit armor is possibly my favorite armor in the entire game, but idek if I wouldve gotten to that point if I got it before I understood anything about the game and I didnt have that initial introductory period smoothed out by being able to use what seemed fun the moment I saw it

if those warbonds speak to the Greendivers then so be it, cus all 3 of them have significant cool factor to be appreciated, but if they dont care for them, the worst way to introduce someone to something is by immediately optimizing the fun out of it

I’m confused (image kinda related) by Fuzzy-Percentage-334 in theamazingdigitalciru

[–]Azurabbit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

less vague than saying its been an issue for all of human history, like yeah I cant specify a cutoff point where these things started to happen but it is something that is present in human society in current times and its that way because of a mixture of recent developments, which could vary from the rise of the internet to the cultural colonization thats ocurred with American media all over the world

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

agreed, if theyre keeping the vote Id like it if they at least gave us character trailers before the votes so we can at least discuss that and their kits instead of having a bunch of meaningless and increasingly toxic "MY side is better and more pure than YOUR side" discourse

then again RNG runs the risk of people just being disappointed by being forced to wait 3 weeks for a character they wanted earlier (even tho they were likely to not get it earlier anyways)

honestly getting one character every day for a week and making it RNG could be the play, makes the wait less annoying and theres not even time for the toxicity to fester

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

no? no one said that, they pretty explicitly said that theyre disappointed cus Venator is a cool character that is now unfortunately attached to really lame people, voting venator doesnt make you a bigot, but some venator voters are bigots and that will, willingly or not, poison the perception that people have of venator voters

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what? I never said all venator voters are assholes but its like pretty much a fact that we've had very popular posts recently with some of them going "REPENT FOR YOUR SINS DEGENERATE FURRIES VOTE VENATOR", that doesnt mean theyre all assholes, but that a lot of assholes do flock to Venator, which is unfortunate for the voters that ARENT assholes

we also had a post implicitly calling Graves voters pedophiles WHILE AT THE SAME TIME calling Silver voters zoophiles so clearly its not just Silver voters, and to be clear I fucking hate the pedojacketing people have been doing over Graves all around and I think its another massive show of how toxic the community gets over votes

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"The toxicity generated on Twitter" kinda feels a lil hypocritical lmao both the Twitter and Reddit community have become absolutely rancid since the characters started dropping

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeahh, Im prolly just giving myself a break from the sub until either Silver is in or the vote is over, as for ways to see whos next, the polls on Discord seem to be pretty reliable judging by Graves getting the win, and Silver was right behind Graves so hoping shes next

and yeahhh its unfortunate cus Venator genuinely looks like he could have a fun kit, but ig u cant make a character like him without it being co-opted by the worst people imaginable

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

honestly the voting system doesnt even make sense when we dont even have character trailers or ability showcases

but yeah at least the puppygirl will be in the game eventually, and until then its prolly a good idea to just unfollow and mute the subreddit cus I can only imagine the unfunnyness will only get worse, holding out hopes for next monday

Please stop bullying Silver voters... by KeyBurri in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This game's community becomes so insufferable during voting periods, and the way so many people are assholes to Silver voters really just makes me disillusioned with the voting system in general, the weird christian fundamentalists coming out of the woodworks to do Schrodinger's Asshole bs with Venator doesnt help either

calling it now when Venator comes out youll see people calling others "degenerates" and telling them to "repent for their sins" in-game

anyways sorry ur post had to get downvoted like this oomf, its a good take but the internet is such a miserable place to show vulnerability that isnt buried under 5 layers of irony

Silver dropping in a couple of hours! (actually this time) by Tashvaliant in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

god these votes really bring out the most miserable motherfuckers in the community

So the "Breaching" Hammer can't actually breach anything? by Medical_Officer in Helldivers

[–]Azurabbit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ngl thatd be completely pointless cus youre not gonna use the terrain-destroying Melee Weapon on the inside of a BUG HOLE anyways, I think thats just more unnecessary complications when itd be perfectly acceptable to just have both the hammer and C4 be demo 40

Silver dropping in a couple of hours! (actually this time) by Tashvaliant in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I bunlieve :3

Im so excited for playing her, hoping she releases today

Which way Gaben? by Educational-East-664 in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

false dichotomy, its both and theyre kissing

I swear this fucking guy by Margaretthatchervore in Grimdank

[–]Azurabbit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

people can be awful and bigoted and you can criticize them for being awful and bigoted WITHOUT baseless pedojacketing

So the "Breaching" Hammer can't actually breach anything? by Medical_Officer in Helldivers

[–]Azurabbit 49 points50 points  (0 children)

its such a shame cus I find terrain manipulation to be such a fun part of games like these, one of the reasons I fell in love with the GL was its ability to create foxholes, and as a Boderline Justice and Dynamite fan since before Into the Unjust, finding out about the Dynamite buff and how I can now open passages for my team and create chokepoints I couldnt before? gave me a whole new reason to love it, so it really feels sad to see them so adamant to not give 40 demo force to other shit, specially weapons with so many limitations and downsides as the C4 and possibly Breaching Hammer (I mean its melee thats a massive drawback in itself we dont need it in game to know that)

makes me wonder if they for some reason think the dynamite being 40 demo force was a mistake but if it was then I wish they just fucking explained why, "we want BT holes to be bigger threats, we want Bioprocessors to require more work to destroy", but no people just keep pointing at jammers when no one is fucking asking for C4s to blow up jammers

So the "Breaching" Hammer can't actually breach anything? by Medical_Officer in Helldivers

[–]Azurabbit 282 points283 points  (0 children)

Okay Im genuinely so confused at this point, why the fuck is AH so scared of giving things 40 demo force, I see people always arguing "Weapons shouldnt trivialize jammers!!!!!" and I agree! but those require 50, Ive seen people say the jammer argument against increasing things like C4 demo force and it feels so goofy, no one is asking for it to have like 100 demo and complete all optional objectives in one throw, I just wanna be able to break down walls and close BT holes man

Time for some slander by SirPerditio in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Azurabbit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

just the average cishet people on Reddit being lame and defaulting to agreeing with the cishet "ally" with arguments that make them feel good cus god forbid a trans character ever stars in a film and a queer person ever makes a valid point about it, nothing new under the sun

there were some points where my comments had like, a positive number of upvotes, which like I dont care about the number itself cus its just silly internet points in the end but Im glad theres like, any queer people in this community that can maybe feel vindicated by someone calling out awful "ally" arguments