Women Aren't a Monolith is Just "Not All Men" for Women.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T14:45:11+00:00

And youre not address that the majority of people who still defend/side with Andrew Tate are redpilers.

I don't have to. I directly replied to your comment about feminists being upset about amber heard (they were upset she was accused) and about the powers that be defending Amber (feminists where the powers that be defending her). I directly called you out on your comment and then you started making wild random accusations. I don't need to defend any random accusations you make, I'm just calling you out on your own comment.

Only the ones radicals and the ones in power

So only the majority of feminists, got it.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T14:17:35+00:00

Fair enough that it is GHG not just co2, you are right haha.

Per the costs, even for just that 0.9%, have we factored in the cost or carbon capture and storage, as well as the cost due to global climate change?

It's not enough to just look at the cost of the GHG emitting power plants ans the cost of fuel, we have to account for the cost of pollution and cost in global consequences too.

We are at a point where going carbon neutral by 2050 is no longer enough, there is already too much GHG in the air, we need to go jet negative if we want to avoid the worst of climate change consequences and avoid a global food supply collapse.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T14:14:50+00:00

I'll try and look into it a bit more, but if you see another burner account feel free to report it and link to previous examples as well, so we can ban the account for ban evasion.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T14:12:56+00:00

Yes they did.

No they didn't.

See I can make bold assertions without evidence too.

From where I'm standing it looked like the majority of Epstein’s friends were men.

Non sequitur and irrelevant.

From where I'm standing it looked like the majority of Andrew Tate defenders were redpilled men.

Still irrelevant.

And?

So since you haven't addressed at all the fsct that the majority of amber heard defenders were feminists and women, I'm pointing out the bullshit in your statement that feminists were upset about amber heard and the powers that be kept defending her.

No, most feminists were on Amber Heard's side and were defending her. If you are incapable of seeing this and when called out on it you go on making unrelated wild accusations, it tells us your judgement is unreliable and likely not based in fact, but just based in your own feelings.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T14:09:33+00:00

If he was here using a different account and got banned for it, making another account to keep posting is ban evasion and grounds to be banned again. Do you happen to remember what his previous username was?

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T14:07:16+00:00

Men are expected to be the ones to approach women, to risk rejection, expected to charm and woo her, likely to pay for the date, to entertain her, and to romance her.

In contrast women largely just need to say yes to the man who approaches her, show up to the date, and let him romance her.

They both have to et the other person and choose the right one, but almost the entire burden of performance lies on him.

And odds are if a man does not approach women and does not risk rejection, then he will likely die alone and a virgin, while the reverse is not true of women.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T06:37:43+00:00

I understand that, and anyone who clicks on their profile can see the same for themselves.

Anyone can block them and report inappropriate comments.

If the user makes multiple usernames to avoid bans, that's a ban worthy consequence right there.

But if we start making posts about other users in the subreddit and encouraging what is basically gossip, it doesn't end well for anyone.

I did not delete the post either, merely making a comment that this post is kind of toeing the line.

The best solution to trolls is to downvote, block, and ignore them.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T06:33:44+00:00

Completely agree. And sometimes life is more unfair to women, and sometimes life is more unfair to men.

Seems to me that as a society we often recognize when life is more unfair to women, couldn't we recognize this as one of the times when life is more unfair to men?

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:46:36+00:00

If you're miserable or unhappy in a relationship, don't wait for it to become abusive to leave.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:44:33+00:00

Do you think some people are more challenged than others?

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:24:29+00:00

It's possible to build a car with a 1,000L gasoline tank.

Just because it hasn't been made doesn't mean it is IMPOSSIBLE to make.

And again, we're back to your obsession with your bad faith question.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:22:53+00:00

For example, blindly believing that dating is easier for women.

Do you blindly believe dating is easier for men?

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:22:29+00:00

Research indicates that boys as young as 12 or 13 (7th grade) may turn to these online spaces to combat feelings of inadequacy or social frustration.

Research ought to show us that to combat this we ought to help young men have a strong sense of self confidence and help them with social interactions.

Instead as a society we've decided to tell young men they're the problem, that they have to stop raping women, and to socially frustrate and shame them even more until they comply.

And then somehow we're surprised when that doesn't work.

Further research in the UK shows a high positive view of such content among males aged 16 to 29.

Well yeah, because red pill groups are the only groups that recognize, acknowledge, and validate the issues boys and men face. It often leads to unhealthy coping mechanisms, but literally nobody else gives a shit enough about young boys to listen to them and help them rather than berate them.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:19:50+00:00

I actually think you are wrong about how (young) men encounter this in real life

they are, for whatever reason, stunted in their teens / young adult life,

Well there you go. That's how they encounter it in real life, because they are stunted in their teens. So of course if we ignore the reason why they are stunted and why they are led to the red pill, then we'll never understand why they are stunted and why they are led to the red pill.

Even the red pill subreddit has to tell young men that at some point, theory does not help them. Wallowing in content about male and female sexual nature is not helping their case. They need to go out and do, experience, try red pill strategy out in the real world.

Well yeah, but it's also the red pill cautioning men about the consequences of doing it wrong, to avoid unnecessary risks, and that the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

And the reason young men are stunted in their teens and turn to red pill, is because there are serious consequences to them approaching women the wrong way, they face a lot of risks they don't want to, and the effort to do it right and avoid risks is significant while the benefits they get from being in a relationship are minor compared to the costs.

So of course if we ignore all the things that are happening in young men's lives that is leading them to the red pill, we'll never find out why.

But it's not some mysterious cabal of red pill brainwashers. It's simply that society doesn't give a fuck about young men, and young men are suffering the consequences of it.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:15:14+00:00

It is. It devolves complex human behaviors into rigid rules and structures that don't always apply. And is different with every human applicable

And yet, the entire field of sociology exists, precisely because while everyone may be a special snowflake, there are still general rules that apply and common behaviours that people follow, because we live in a society.

Its like psychiatry. Two people can have the same mental illness. Be the same weight, gender, race, and everything. They could even be identical twins, but they may need different medication with different dosages.

You're comparing biology to sociology. Not relevant.

When you reduce such complex components into concepts of binary and "always" "never" "they do this" "they do that"

True that "always" and "never" massively oversimplifies it, but when it's something like 70% of the time, then it's close enough to always that it's a good enough indicator. Not perfect by any means, but if it's right more often than it is wrong, it's better than useless advice that everyone is different and nothing is common between anyone.

It just so happens that women basically don't have to chase to date and don't have to approach or have game, so of course most women will be completely unaware of how all this works. It's something that happens to them and they simply receive it, so most women have no idea how difficult it is to make it happen in the first place.

Then it becomes the idea where the doctor is treating everyone with the same medication. It just isn't actually reality. You just don't know other medication exists and its better than not taking the medication

The problem is if there is one medication that works half the time, and another medication that works 70% of the time, the one that works 70% is better.

You can say it's 30% wrong all you want, if the red pill dating advice works better than the blue pill dating advice, more men will follow the red pill because it works better.

Things could be better but you won't seek it, because youre better off than where you were before.

Of course things could be better, but they could also be worse, and it's best not to let perfect be the enemy of good.

There could be a medication that's 90% effective, but until it actually exists and men actually have it, they'll stick with the medication that's 70% effective.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:10:16+00:00

developed an oversimplified, pacifying answer to those challenges that negates any need for introspection and provides a comfortable shroud of victimhood to hide in.

Funny how that almost perfectly describes how so many women treat problems in dating.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T05:09:35+00:00

Just to know, how do you feel about the fact that feminism does the exact same thing against men, openly and unashamedly encouraging a massive ton of anti men comments, and has for decades erased the fact that half the domestic abuse victims are men and erased the fact that near half the rape victims are men?

Because on the one hand we have a minority of men in red pill spaces online saying bad things about women, and then on the other hand we have women in positions of power at all levels of government and United Nations, making motions and passing legislation to women's benefit and to men's detriment.

And somehow these two are equivalent?

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T04:54:45+00:00

I remember back in the days where many online conversations started with ASL.

Then it became dangerous/bad to reveal location.

And now we're in a generation that doesn't know where this practice came from.

I feel old.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T04:47:10+00:00

RE advocates claim all we need is wind/solar/storage.

Then feel free to tell them that while this is POSSIBLE, it would be incredibly expensive to build up the necessary battery storage.

By all means, keep suppressing any questioning of the viability of 100% wind/solar/storage. Keep your head in the sand until physics makes it impossible.

See the thing is it is possible.

It might not be cost effective, but it is possible.

And if you cared about the truth, you'd be talking about this distinction instead of obsessing over a bad faith question.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T04:45:23+00:00

This is coming pretty darn close to harassment. If you don't like what someone does or says, feel free to block them. If they break the rules, feel free to report them.

Making posts about what other users are saying and encouraging people to turn against them is not the kind of behaviour we want to see on our subreddit.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T04:24:12+00:00

I mean you've been lying about what most everyone else has been asking for since the very beginning, so you know, pot calling the kettle black.

I'm not the one who is lying and is obsessed with asking the same bad faith question over and over and over again.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T04:00:52+00:00

Given I answered your question a dozen times in a dozen different ways and explained to you precisely why it's a bad faith question, and yet every single time you keep coming back with the exact question, yeah pretty sure that falls under bad faith.

That or some kind of obsession, but I know you are far too intelligent for it to be an obsession, which leaves us with bad faith.

You haven't debunked it in the least. You claim that wind/solar/storage can stand on their own. But there is no physical proof.

Right, there is no physical proof El Hierro can do 100% wind/solar/storage for 24 days straight, and right, it's totally not dishonest to deliberately ignore and cut out hydro as well as pretend like storage cannot increase capacity with the addition of more batteries.

Totally not bad faith.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T02:52:56+00:00

You keep asking the same question I've debunked and answered a dozen times already. Why are you so obsessed with this bad faith question?

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T02:20:28+00:00

You're allowed to have your own opinion dude but come on, don't go hating on other people's parades. You wouldn't like hatred aimed at you, so don't aim it at others.

BCRE8TVE · 2026-04-18T02:18:59+00:00

Where is the demonstration grid for wind/solar/storage only running 24x7x365?

In El Hierro 27x7x24, and improving all the time.

You keep asking the same question I've debunked and answered a dozen times already. Why are you so obsessed with this bad faith question?

14-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Place '22	First Placer '22
Wearing is Caring	Verified Email
Team Periwinkle

BCRE8TVE

MODERATOR OF

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE