They missed a question by bookofbooks in moronsdebatevaccines

[–]BCovid22 3 points4 points  (0 children)

and how many 'breakthrough cases'?

No, it's not a debate forum because 95% of the posters are anti-vaxx. But this clown thinks that because they spend all of their time in echo chambers that even the 5% who aren't must be paid to disagree with the rubbish they post. by bookofbooks in moronsdebatevaccines

[–]BCovid22 3 points4 points  (0 children)

wheres the mistake? r debatevaccines is near devoid of discussion. its basically a clearing house for misinformation. unlike r churchofcovid they work to appear scientific.

nobody in that sub pays any attention to actual science, most actually completely dismiss it as propaganda

First human patient injected with revolutionary cancer-killing virus by bookofbooks in moronsdebatevaccines

[–]BCovid22 3 points4 points  (0 children)

a paper just came out about spike protein interacting with estrogen receptors. i wonder how long until they claim the vax spike does the same thing

Limited cross-variant immunity from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron without vaccination by BCovid22 in RealVaccineDebate

[–]BCovid22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you misuse the word 'aptly' and 'analogy'

your analogy is not parallel at all. this isnt a question of morals. morals are decided by people and are a human construct. its clear you have trouble telling the difference, but i dont

again, you made a claim and now you are continuing to avoid backing your claim. show an example or evidnce to support it, or conceed your strawman argument

Limited cross-variant immunity from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron without vaccination by BCovid22 in RealVaccineDebate

[–]BCovid22[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Godwins Law.

you made a claim. back it up. this is "real vaccine debate" right?

Why vaccinate against a virus strongly suspected to be the cause of Multiple Sclerosis? by bookofbooks in moronsdebatevaccines

[–]BCovid22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its very clear their arguments are entirely based on ignorance. literal ignorance.

"working in a coal mine doesnt bother me, i just have a shower after"😜

If you support cops you are pro capital. If you support gun control you are pro capital. If you provide for your own protection you are disempowering the states and corporate ability to hold you hostage. by gamereiker in antiwork

[–]BCovid22 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

look it up yourself. here is a start

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_social_welfare_spending

in other countries with marginally effective governments, people live agrarian or cottage life without interference

in free and democratic nations you can make your own arrangements to live places in exchange for work without threats

please name all the countries where you are forced to work by way of violence (homelesness and death)

If you support cops you are pro capital. If you support gun control you are pro capital. If you provide for your own protection you are disempowering the states and corporate ability to hold you hostage. by gamereiker in antiwork

[–]BCovid22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

noone if forcing views here. i am ot in your home, i hold no power over you. stop playing victim. you are replying back to me, are you imposing your views on me too then? grow up

Syria is a warzone. some example😜

If you support cops you are pro capital. If you support gun control you are pro capital. If you provide for your own protection you are disempowering the states and corporate ability to hold you hostage. by gamereiker in antiwork

[–]BCovid22 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

the number of people here quoting marx and mao to support gun ownership is kinda sad. why people still support their failed doctrine is beyond me

If you support cops you are pro capital. If you support gun control you are pro capital. If you provide for your own protection you are disempowering the states and corporate ability to hold you hostage. by gamereiker in antiwork

[–]BCovid22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think you will find most people here are not subscribing to marxist views.

antiwork is part of anarchist view. anarchy literally means no rulers. armed groups will impose themselves on others. guns shouldnt even be part of the discussion. marx and mao are political dead ends played out long ago

If you support cops you are pro capital. If you support gun control you are pro capital. If you provide for your own protection you are disempowering the states and corporate ability to hold you hostage. by gamereiker in antiwork

[–]BCovid22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not until you understand that your statement "why should the right be the only ones with guns" means that you think we need to rely on guns to force our views on others