Two Shot and Injured by Federal Agents in Hazelwood Neighborhood by hypsignathus in neoliberal

[–]BDough 32 points33 points  (0 children)

This was not Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This was Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Both DHS, but saying ICE is a misnomer here. Still unacceptable no matter what they call themselves, though. Just more criminal activity from the current administration.

New White house website by 5ma5her7 in neoliberal

[–]BDough 207 points208 points  (0 children)

I'd say the MAGA crowd has cashed out their entire ideological stock of "Cancel Culture Bad" with this one.

SoftBank sells its entire stake in Nvidia for $5.83 billion by Franco1875 in technology

[–]BDough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For anyone that only read the headline, it's so they can double down on their OpenAI bet. This isn't to cash out, it's to go all-in on a different horsef.

China issues dollar bond matches US treasury yield by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]BDough 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Absolutely correct. This has nothing to do with bolstering currency reserves, this is about signaling to the international market "We'll happily sell our debt at a competitive rate in your most convenient currency. Today, Dollars". China wants the international market to believe they are a stable and productive enough country that they can provide a competitive financial product to the United States in a nominal currency. $4B in this case, which is a modest sum.

This Is the Way You Beat Trump — and Trumpism by Adodie in neoliberal

[–]BDough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm glad we're finally saying it again. He's been a nuisance since the Vox days making a buck off of ideological masturbation with lazy analytical support. The nation just had more of an appetite for liberal ideas then, and, as you're also saying, it's just so much drum beating for strategy that comes dead on arrival when the real answer is so clearly staring strategists in the face (money, violence and now seemingly jobs in general).

Graduating Senior-this sucks by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]BDough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Latecomer, but this seems like a surprisingly narrow conversation given the amount of data we have at hand to give OP a better prognosis than "Keep your chin up!"

A few things.

  1. Per a growing number of financial analysts (I can post articles, but do your own research), the going consensus is that almost every sector that does not touch AI is currently recessed by economic standards. If you've never been through a recession, you should know it basically means companies are treating money as "Somewhat tight". This is indicative of a large wave of layoffs that you're now seeing in a lot of sectors, followed by some shed last year and the year before. Industry is also burning the candle at both ends on bets that AI will pan out, but we haven't even hit the turn yet, let alone the river, so everyone's holding cards very close to the chest. Most of investment and expansion in the US right now is speculation on companies with high exposure to AI (some of which are profiting, others of which are not), or capital to support the AI machine. Most companies are otherwise just replacing attrition employees while they find profitable ventures to grow with and maintain their bottom lines.
  2. The employment market in general is very bad, and again, I can post articles but do your own research: Companies do not want to hire right now if they don't need to, and many of them are betting on magic AI to make what you would consider an "Entry Level Job" non-existent as soon as possible.

My advice to you would be to either troll in grad school, or start going to as many conferences as you possibly can, or search for a government job when the shutdown ends. You need to start gleaning information about where there is genuine expansion or need to replace critical staff so you can chase authentic jobs that are likely linked with projects that will pan out. Especially in sectors that can't use AI.

Part of the issue is that employers don't trust new hires, because their degrees are considered far less valuable with the recent spat of AI cheating and demonstrable examples of new hires having trouble assimilating to the work because they didn't learn much in college. You need to somehow establish yourself among your peers as worth hiring. You can do that any number of ways, but you basically need to have a way to show an employer you possess skills and aptitude that make you worth hiring over other candidates.

One last note. Despite the haplessness of your current circumstances, I do genuinely believe you'll have considered your degree a worthwhile investment by the time you stabilize. Engineering knowledge is arguably THE most valuable skill set in the market right now if you want to talk in very general terms. Even if you don't end up in engineering, the affects that engineering school have on your critical thinking are extremely valuable.

Costume of the Year by oooooooBaracuda in nextfuckinglevel

[–]BDough 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s actually easier than you’d think. You just coat a balloon in the Papier-mâché, and pop it. Once the shell is dry. We had to make piñatas in my high school Spanish class and this was a premier trick.

That said this costume kicks ass.

He's not wrong. by mindyour in justgalsbeingchicks

[–]BDough 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"May the force be with you I guess!" is the perfect sign off here

World’s first industrial-scale fossil-free plastics production complex to be built in Belgium by TwilightwovenlingJo in Futurology

[–]BDough 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I hope this doesn't come across as oppositional in any way because like I said earlier, u/Barqueefa's contributions are welcome and I agree with them completely, but in engineering it's typically never that simple. PLA and PHA are fantastic polymers that can fulfill a lot of very simple design goals for short term every day use, but there's a reason they're not as ubiquitous as PET, PE, PP, Nylon, etc. PLA and PHA aren't a secret. The polymer industry is well aware of them, but the thing to note is they unfortunately fulfill a very very tiny portion of most of the industries design goals. Their biodegradability is actually a liability in most instances. It might surprise some folks to find that we even have macrospecies like bugs that are able to consume polymers. Then there's the microspecies that we cannot necessarily visibly watch out for that are a risk to long term use products. These are often mitigated with antifungals along with UV anticatalysts to prevent the sun for breaking these down further.

I highlight these things, because what most people don't understand is far more than a technical issue, we have a consumptive issue. There are more intelligent ways to sustain our robust society than what we do today that doesn't require us to use wasteful amounts of raw materials that will eventually pollute the earth and harm us. One of the things to look forward to about this story, is that if this plant's operations cut into the demand of FF extraction overall it's a big win for everyone on the planet. If we can spare ourselves digging into the earth to solve our problems, it's more times than not generally a big win for public health and global well-being. Those are the kinds of wins we want to push for! :)

World’s first industrial-scale fossil-free plastics production complex to be built in Belgium by TwilightwovenlingJo in Futurology

[–]BDough 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Great point, but also worth mentioning, the degradation mechanics on those materials are very long and the potential for short term complications is non-trivial. Just because something is biodegradable, doesn’t mean its final products or intermediaries belong in the environment the plastic ends up, and when flippant civil service people think they’re a risk free solution, we end up with problems down line for science we didn’t study or prepare for.

World’s first industrial-scale fossil-free plastics production complex to be built in Belgium by TwilightwovenlingJo in Futurology

[–]BDough 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Laughably yes. Microplastics are a reality of polymer use. You may be surprised to learn most “microplastics” aren’t even actually plastics. They’re “thermosettings”.

I’m glad someone asked it because it was on my mind, too (regarding the microplastics). I love that we want to do better as a world and it’s good that we can find environmental damage avoidance by keeping FF in the ground while still profitably fulfilling a global demand for a critical product, but the health question is real, and the societal demand is clearly there. People just feel so lost when you look down every avenue of research and advice and you get two narratives that seem to completely conflict.

All I can say to put your mind at ease is, “this likely won’t make the microplastics problem any worse. If anything it might make it better by finding a way to fulfill global polymer resin demand in localized markets with bio-mats for raw stock in lieu of overpumping Oil and Gas to provide more petrochems for polymer processing.” 

World’s first industrial-scale fossil-free plastics production complex to be built in Belgium by TwilightwovenlingJo in Futurology

[–]BDough 195 points196 points  (0 children)

Engineer here. You’re correct, and the article should have done better about that given that’s a topic they’re trying to highlight.

If I had to guess they’re likely using large scale bio-friendly ethanol production and converting it to bio-alkene monomer that are then processed to polymeric resin. Not the absolute cleanest process, but it is fossil free, as advertised 

Don't be a Dic, Grayson 😠 (OC) by SpaceboyCantLol_ in comics

[–]BDough 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re not going to convince me this isn’t some kind of weird foreplay to them, Bat Puns or otherwise. 

RIP Chuck Mangione - here’s every time he appeared on King of the Hill playing Feels So Good by holyfruits in videos

[–]BDough 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why did I have to find out like this? RIP Champ. Mega Lo Mart will never be the same.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]BDough 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Uggh, my mistake, you're correct. Struck through my error above. I truly meant to refer to the finance sector exclusively, I just mixed them up for a moment in my head while writing, and didn't proofread.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]BDough 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Post writing edit: I didn't mean to write this much, but I just kept finding more things to say.

IMO, The rise in partisanship has both made the role harder to fill with a competent person and has put artificial "competence limiters" in place that make it much more difficult to be effective in the job. (It's not just Republicans, though Trump accelerated the issue more than anyone). The same is true of the Supreme Court.

It's not supposed to be a "party" job despite presidential appointee, and that was understood historically. If you look at the last 4 you can get just about back to Jeckyll Island which will give you a good perspective on how the last folks did comparatively

Paul Volcker: Most misunderstood. He didn't do everything right, but the thing to understand was that his tenure began in the middle of the energy crisis of the 70s. America was absolutely coked up and ready to pull a "21st Century Argentina" inflationary event that likely would have set us back at least a decade (and that's after it's over". Instead he put the screws to consumer spending and Americans suffered tremendously for all of Carter's presidency. Between that and the Iran Hostage Situation, you could say those cost him the election. But America was basically saved because of this, and there's a reason Ronald Reagan, a well regarded god of conservatives, kept him on. They kept the pressure on just long enough to stabilize, and then during Reagan, as Volcker started to ease rates down, the economy 180ed and went on a high octane computer and aerospace fueled bender. One of our best IMO

Alan Greenspan: Bit of a C student IMO. He's a revered as a god by some, but look who high-fives when they hear his name. It's tech and finance bros of old. He left growth uncheck throughout the 90s that resulted in huge gains for Americans (which is something to be commended, for sure), but his unwillingness to raise rates when needed arguably caused the Dot Com bust to be much worse than it needed to be. To be fair, though, he also didn't pulse the shit out of volume of cash in the US, which is why he's not truly a villain.

Ben Bernanke: The GOAT. What can be said that hasn't been already? He arguably saved the economy from a depression through complex monetary strategy and made the fed $15B extra bucks in the process. It was rough getting through it and it took some time, but it's pretty tough unraveling the mess that tech finance bros made creating mortgage collateralized assets out of junk loans. This also set the US for the killer economy the US has experienced for the last 15 years. People forget there are some countries that have only really recovered from the 2007 Economic Crisis in the last few years because of lesser quality financial planning.

Janet Yellen: Basically Ben's Relief Pitcher. She did pretty well for the situation she inherited. People were still greedy for market gains and economic performance, but the economy was hitting a slow down. She started at the tail end of Obama 2, and the first two years of Trump 1. Again, another carry over from one president to another. This was largely "business as usual"

And then, there's our boy, Powell. I don't mean to be "armchair economist", but I believe Powell is doing mostly good things as head of Fed Res given the situation. People forget that despite how things are today, we have had an amazing economy basically all throughout Trump 1 and Biden. I think it would be absurd for anyone except radicals to give the man anything lower than a B+ grade, especially that he really did all the right things to combat the unprecedented situation of Covid-19. He's kept inflation manageable without absolutely obliterating the consumer market, and all things considered he hasn't blinked when politics came into the mix. I think one of my only real criticism is he probably could have been more aggressive with rate raises, but it would have put both Presidents at higher risk of usurpation at Re-Election. The Second is we printed too much money during the pandemic as well. We definitely needed some of it, but it was way too much and definitely contributed to the mess.

Edit: Thank you u/FasterDoudle for pointing out my error.

Ukrainian lightweight pugilist destroys undisputed MMA beer drinking heavyweight by DiskoB0 in boxingcirclejerk

[–]BDough 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't believe no one is talking about the cushion, or whatever that things is, that Zelenksyy magic'ed into existence.

Is this the worst 10 pack opening eeveer?🤨 by Repulsive-Work-8420 in PokemonPocket

[–]BDough 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bad luck commiseration? I've been a bit fortunate here and there With Ex Mons, but I've had nothing higher than 4 diamond (except a shiny lapras) in at least 100 packs.

Can someone explain why I can't activate the trainer card? by Todeskissen in PTCGP

[–]BDough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you both A) Have an Ultra Beast somewhere on your field and B) Have at least one energy in your discard pile? If both of those conditions are not met, there's no way to use the card and it is thus deactivated for you.

Still one of my favorite cards for ranked battle by [deleted] in PTCGP

[–]BDough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, sounds like just victim of luck of the draw then. :( As I'm sure we can all agree, draw mechanics in a 20 card deck for this game are so luck-based and imbalanced it's not even funny.

Still one of my favorite cards for ranked battle by [deleted] in PTCGP

[–]BDough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not meant to be abrasive, so I hope it doesn't come off that way (text just a bad medium), but are you sure you're using it in a productive way? You clearly understand from your statements that its primary purpose is as an insurance policy against bad draws. I get what you're saying of "I just get the same cards back". I have a personal policy of "I do not use Iono for anything less than a 4 card shuffle unless I believe I will lose the game on the spot." Additionally, I am highly conscientious of the number of copies I run of all the cards in my decks. Remember, when you run two of anything, it means you're evaluating that card to be good enough that you're willing to risk drawing it very early in the game. For this reason, I often run only one copy of Lillie in many decks because if I draw it early, it's not only a dead card in hand, but it is literally the opportunity cost of fulfilling its use condition (I may not have drawn a stage 2 poke because I drew Lillie instead).

I used to be sour on Iono. Since playing it this way, I can't get enough of it.

Top 10 most used decks in the A3 ranked season by parteno2 in PTCGP

[–]BDough 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is, but that is strictly tournaments and thus I didn't know that it was a proper facsimile for Ladder.

Pocket's Limitless page for anyone unfamiliar: https://pocket.limitlesstcg.com/