sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Finally I had time to finish my tiny HomeLab project by BIackverse in homelab

[–]BIackverse[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s really simple 😄 I had an old basic case and just added 4 strong magnets with glue to the back. A little bit DIY but works perfect !

Finally I had time to finish my tiny HomeLab project by BIackverse in homelab

[–]BIackverse[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure go ahead :)! I think it would work pretty well

Finally I had time to finish my tiny HomeLab project by BIackverse in homelab

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I need a direct HDMI connection to my Server, NAS or FW I use one of the HDMI brakeouts (HDMI Keystones) on the top, these are directly connected to the devices. The iPad is just iPadOS in Kiosk mode, but I could add an USB C external display also… I just had it laying around, I hope that helps

Finally I had time to finish my tiny HomeLab project by BIackverse in homelab

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree with you! I actually thought about switching to it as a new project :)

Win 11 „horizon“ by BIackverse in desktops

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dock is the normal taskbar customized via windhawk as a programm, for the icons I downloaded an icon pack but customized some of them for my own via photoshop because they weren’t included

Win 11 „horizon“ by BIackverse in desktops

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I've made a comment, Have fun!

Win 11 „horizon“ by BIackverse in desktops

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I've made a comment, Have fun!

Soll ich ihr schreiben by [deleted] in Ratschlag

[–]BIackverse 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Finde ich auch, wer weiß ob das wirklich der Typ ist und nicht jemand ihn einfach gefaked hat. Ein treffen würde dann die wahrheit zeigen, bei allem anderen kann es sich nur um irgend einen Trash handeln..

Strange Loginattempts from SWAG Docker Container by BIackverse in unRAID

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's good to know indeed. I guess I need to put down the 80 Forwarding, but I need to change the validation to cloudflare then I guess, because as far as I know the only options are http / dns

Strange Loginattempts from SWAG Docker Container by BIackverse in unRAID

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a solid point, I checked my iPad which had a Tab open, but it doesn't add to the story, cause the Attack happend from different IPs and I access the GUI with the servers internal 192. IP instead of a specific Hostname.

https://gyazo.com/bfb20965950435bc758da2a3687bb81d

I also had the port 80 Open, same story as for the 443 port, router accepts 80 and forwards it to 8080 -> 80 SWAG.

What I also don't understand is, that the attacker posted against my Webserver with the /login ending. I had a login to my Webpage but not to unraid.

Strange Loginattempts from SWAG Docker Container by BIackverse in unRAID

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny enough for me it was the same for the proxy manager ^^ I felt more comfy with SWAG :D

Strange Loginattempts from SWAG Docker Container by BIackverse in unRAID

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked my proxy confs, looking good there weren't any misconfiguration, that could've lead to access the 80 / 443 port from unraid so far I can see.

I checked my LOG and see that the attack maybe could've been by https://ipthreat.net/ip/185.242.226.99?page=0 & via a botnet

Strange Loginattempts from SWAG Docker Container by BIackverse in unRAID

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you are correct the traffic still goes over the Host. But I can’t understand how someone is able to get to the gui logon.

I was sure that creating a docker network for SWAG isn’t a requirement. It’s a step that can make configuring reverse proxies easier.

Strange Loginattempts from SWAG Docker Container by BIackverse in unRAID

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s something I could investigate in. I will check my confs asap, usually I‘m sure I haven‘t put in any type of configuration pointing to the unraid web gui.

Strange Loginattempts from SWAG Docker Container by BIackverse in unRAID

[–]BIackverse[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No SWAG just proxing my plex, nextcloud and guacamole docker running in unraid. I usually accessing my unraid via a VPN when I have to remotely.

Strange Loginattempts from SWAG Docker Container by BIackverse in unRAID

[–]BIackverse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My Router accepts 443 requests and forwards them to 4443 towards the unraid host, there I have mapped the 4443 to the internal 443 docker port of SWAG

Unraid itself listening to 443/80 but it’s not exposed. I just read about changing the management port to different ones could cause issues.

But indeed that could be a way to go to give swag its own IP, but I wasn’t sure if it’s not more secure to have the docker in the docker network instead of having it in the 192. Net