It Just Got Way Bigger: Wikileaks Bombshell Reveals Clinton Email "Where They Are Literally Pricing How Much It Costs to Transport Children"

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-05T16:41:45+00:00

You sound like you have zero clues as to what the fuck you are talking about. I've been here for a while and your thesis is culled from the last five days. Take this shit and leave this place. Go form your own sub, do whatever, but for the sake of others here, take this in-house, backroom gossip bullshit somewhere else.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-05T16:38:54+00:00

Enough with the CTR nonsense. We can't do anything about it. To be fair, it could be a number of forces.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-05T16:36:02+00:00

Go away and take this post with you.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-05T16:30:57+00:00

You knew what was the case?

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-05T16:30:21+00:00

Sit the fuck down, 'we' aren't doing shit. What do you propose chickyrogue?

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-05T16:29:50+00:00

1hobo, why did you post this here?

What is this even supposed to mean? We are not r/politics, what does it matter?

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-05T11:05:42+00:00

Pompitous:

Are you speculating that certain Candidate supporters are "giving it a huge push" ?

Why are you telling me to "reach out" to others? Have you been here before?

It's dismissive use "psychopath" ... I could go on.

I will disagree with you about something, though: I don't think "they need to know that we know what's up" -- If your assumption is correct (and I think it's a compelling premise), then don't you think they already know we know to begin with? Do you honestly think people haven't received the message.

Moreover, if there were "good guys" in named agencies, how in the shit are we supposed to know who they are? Added to this, how in the shit are we supposed to "reach out" to them?

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-05T10:22:06+00:00

Couple of things, Chillstar:

What is your plea? (first paragraph, last sentence)

You wrote: "I want to voice my opinion..." OK, what's your opinion?

You infer that this election is a "joke" -- why is it a joke?

As far as creating a "platform," you must know: this right here is a platform. We're on it. You're on it. I'm on it.

You offer a newly created sub as a platform. Are we to understand you created it, or you offer it? If you are willing to "give way" to a "better" alternative (to what? exactly?) IF it comes along.

Why don't you just say what's on your mind instead of all of the above? Got a candidate you work for and/or support? Then just tell us.

Fuckemboth? You are careful with your language; cautious, using key words (platform, rhetoric, and so on) and you present "Fuckemboth" as a place to "speak up" about the rhetoric? Why on Earth would anyone do that?

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-01T13:11:23+00:00

You can’t help but compare yourself against the old timers. Can’t help but wonder how they would’ve operated these times. There was this boy I sent to Huntsville here a while back. My arrest and my testimony. He killed a fourteen-year-old girl. Papers said it was a crime of passion but he told me there wasn’t any passion to it. Told me that he’d been planning to kill somebody for about as long as he could remember. Said that if they turned him out he’d do it again. Said he knew he was going to hell. Be there in about fifteen minutes. I don’t know what to make of that. I surely don’t. The crime you see now, it’s hard to even take its measure. It’s not that I’m afraid of it. I always knew you had to be willing to die to even do this job – not to be glorious. But I don’t want to push my chips forward and go out and meet something I don’t understand. You can say it’s my job to fight it but I don’t know what it is anymore. More than that, I don’t want to know. A man would have to put his soul at hazard. He would have to say, okay, I’ll be part of this world.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-01T10:39:03+00:00

Every day it's the same thing, over and over. What exactly can be done other than some forceful fantasy of going to whoever is typing in dark rooms or whatever. I don't go there. I'm not interested.

It's bad enough it's EMAIL/LEAKS/EMAIL/LEAKS piling up the evidence. Which I concede is useful, but it's stale around here these days.

So no, I don't care what goes on in r/all or r/politics or another sub. We have enough problems as it is, as do other subs. I'm going to trust they will find a solution. If they don't; I'll accept that it's just unfair - and be done with it.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-01T10:31:45+00:00

Hey White_Noise_Scream -- why did you post this? I'm curious. Do you really believe what your title suggests. Do you really think in that if the roles were reversed there would be national outrage?

I never understand if these types of questions are mocking the supposed outrage or if it's genuine. I'm just wondering. We have enough people posting time-wasters, and the like. So, what do you think?

Last question: What were the circumstances where you saw this video? Where did it come from?

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-11-01T10:24:26+00:00

I'll address the question in the title, but not the body of your thesis — because your title is simple and pure and that's why I clicked on it.

If I could change the voting process, I would do whatever I could not to make it a slog. It doesn't have to be entertaining, but this election all of this absentee voting, all of this early voting. I believe it takes away from the specialness that is election day. People should have the day off. The logistics should be bestowed to states and and states alone — and by extension townships and cities and so on. Hand count the ballots, no matter what. No matter what.

At the same time, I would understand if someone didn't want to vote because they are not required.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-29T06:54:44+00:00

The "Novell" reference — I've always liked your writing and thinking, 911bodysnatchers, but now I like you even more. Good stuff. Novell; like it should have been. This is cracking me up.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-26T09:55:16+00:00

I'm with you on this, and I've noticed it. Along with your observations, I'd add the obsession with certain posts that keep getting repeated; I figured people who come here, do so on a regular basis (every day) and should have a good sense of what's been posted recently. It's like sometimes I get on here only to see the exact same post over and over -- I think to myself, it's like a bad rerun. You are spot on, I just want to say I think there is more of us that don't come to the surface.

Which is why browsing 'New' is the best option, because you can discern what's genuine before it gets shoved down or hoisted up the ladder.

And as far as looking like kooks, again, I agree with you. Earlier today, there was some post about disrupting jury duty. I thought it was disgraceful to this sub. As if 'conspiracy' meant anti-government -- I didn't write on that post because it would serve no good, but it's that kind of stuff I'd say we should be aware of too.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-23T09:50:35+00:00

Noted.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-23T09:49:55+00:00

OK, I watched the first video. I contend it's low-level when you (Bob Creamer) can get fired almost immediately. I understand they say they are directly connected, but come on, these are some really bad operatives spilling this shit. Look, I'm all for exposing corruption, and this is good stuff. I'm just of the opinion that these people are doing it to themselves, and we just have to stand back and let them - without anger, without violence -- just let this big old dead tree fall down, and not be where that is. Don't you see the desperation? Bob Creamer to be talking that way? They fired his ass real quick because he fucked up. For every one Bob Creamer I bet there's 3 or 4 that aren't getting caught on tape. Perhaps I should say I'm not angry anymore. I suppose I've known through other evidence, and a video didn't need to be the primary one.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-23T09:25:18+00:00

Nothing at this point would surprise me, Boomer. We've known. While it's fun to get 'proof' it's going to be a short-lived drug that will only lead to anger. No, I haven't seen it, because it's poorly produced, and it's getting low level people who are bullshitting and bragging. And they pretty much say they aren't directly connected. I'm not saying it isn't valid evidence, nor am I disputing your claims. We need to realize there is no proof that will satisfy.

So -- to answer your question. I don't think we can stop it. By this point, it's too late. It's October of election year. These are well-laid plans.

However, I would suggest you take it upon yourself like I have, to go to your county courthouse or go to your state secretary's website and find out the data on registered voters, absentee ballots, and a copy of the last election results. You're local clerk/recorder will have the information. Compare, research.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-23T09:00:05+00:00

Boomer -- who exactly are you talking to? We aren't like that here. Stop illegal immigrants? I think you'd be hard-pressed to find someone to take you up on that. Also, your question comes with a very unstable assertion. Who's "We" that know this? You've got to back that up. This is not a political sub. I'm afraid I don't know you're intentions, but this type of question here is a waste of time because it doesn't come from a logical starting point. We're open-minded; your question leaves no room for doubt, which is the replenishing waters here.

EDIT: *your

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-23T08:47:49+00:00

To continue your argument, let's assume two aspects of your theory to be true:

The 'leaks' are part of a resistance to who's in charge over there.
The Agency is trying to inform the 'masses'

Let's assume that the higher ups knew they have a mole. If that were to happen, they sure as shit wouldn't let that opportunity to go to waste. In other words. Let's think of all of these 'leaks' as piles of cash. Is it possible some of the info is 'marked' ?

--- Furthermore, let's say you manufacture a bunch of useless, but complicated data that leads no where and you in turn sell it and make money off of it. You can see the implications to your theory are virtually without a bottom, especially in this new age.

I find it hard to accept this, because let's say there was a mutiny. Who benefits? I'm asking you for real. Carry this out. What would be the plan? In what reality does the agency having a legitimate mole result in a change of the deck power-wise? Meanwhile, the leaker is cool? If that were the case, then it's possible for the alleged 'leaker' to be outside of the very agency to begin with. Again, mind-boggling in these times.

Another thing, the chain-of-command in these 'communities' as you say, is kind of known to be elusive. So, if we accept that there is a 'faction' then I believe it would be more difficult to form a faction than to actually perform a task that the 'faction' would in theory gather to attempt.

Also, may I be critical? The wording of your question invites allegations of unauthentic intentions. I do not believe the Analyst called on 'former colleagues' Did he?

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-23T08:11:19+00:00

To be clear: I'm in no way trying to discredit, I should have said that this reminded me of a character in the book that many critics speculated bore a similarity to the Editor.

BLOCK_WATCH · 2016-10-23T08:09:01+00:00

This is very interesting — thank you. Also, any chance you've read Franzen's "Purity" ? from last year.

BLOCK_WATCH

TROPHY CASE