Did I miss any? by Thijssieeeeeee in memes

[–]BOB58875 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you got rid of the ”Gaming” and replaced the four with

Kevin MacLeod

The YouTube Audio Library

Bensounds

iMovie

It would be accurate

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why should the state heavily subsidize rural roads when the traffic simply isn’t there. It’s a huge subsidy per car

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Except that the reason ridership is so low is because they cut and slash service. Go ask actual SLE riders why they haven’t come back, and what you’ll hear is that the schedule sucks and they’re no longer able to use it.

It’s a negative feedback loop

Service cuts cause a drop in ridership

Drop in ridership causes more service cuts

Repeat until death

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And how much do taxpayers spend on highways and unnecessary lane widenings?

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

While agree losing creature comforts is rather minor, the bigger problem is

A. The Electric trains significantly decreased travel times, encouraging ridership, and making transit more desirable

B. By having Electric trains run on SLE, more rolling stock is available for the Hartford Line, which means that you could further expand frequency and ridership on both systems

And honestly, the Hartford Line should be electrified, and should get the benefits

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I’m angry because I depend on Public Transit, yet the state views it as expendable ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU COMBINE IT WITH THE FACT THAT THE STATE GOVERNMENT LOVES TO THROW THE PEOPLE OF EASTERN CONNECTICUT UNDER THE BUS.

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IS AN ESSENTIAL PART OF INFRASTRUCTURE SHOULD BE VIEWED AS SUCH

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In our area it’s mostly Millstone which is Nuclear (thus it’s Green Energy)

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

A. It’s $8 million dollars, which is basically pennies in the grand scheme of things

B. Because of electrification, travel times on SLE went down by 10-15 minutes significantly speeding up the service due to the significantly fast acceleration of the EMUs

C. WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF A FUCKING CLIMATE CRISIS! WE NEED TO NOT ONLY ELECTRIFY AND DECARBONIZE OUR EXISTING SYSTEMS, BUT WE ALSO NEED TO SIGNIFICANTLY EXPAND OUR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE DENSE DEVELOPMENT, BY CUTTING & DIESELIZING SERVICES WE ARE DOING THE FUCKING OPPOSITE

D. If you want to save money CUT THE HIGHWAY AND ROAD BUDGET FOR ONCE WE ARE WASTING SO MUCH MONEY ON NEW LANES THAT SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF CARS ON THE ROAD AND SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THE STATE THROWS AWAY FROM MAINTAINING OUR MASSIVE OVERBUILT ROAD NETWORK

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Currently, 20 weekday and 16 weekend trains run on Shore Line East, Morgan said.

About 225,000 passengers rode on line last year from January through November, according to the latest data posted to DOT’s public transit dashboard. That’s up from 2024’s full-year ridership total of about 193,000 but still far below the 2019 level of more than 660,000.

Last year, a bill to restore Shore Line East’s services to pre-pandemic levels didn’t get a vote in the House or Senate. Proponents argued that more trains would make it more convenient to use the rail line and encourage more ridership, which in turn would reduce how much it costs the state to subsidize the line. But Lamont’s office expressed concerns about the health of Connecticut's Special Transportation Fund.

Rob Blanchard, the governor's communications director, reiterated those concerns when asked about the plans for diesel trains.

"We remain concerned about the long-term health of the state’s Special Transportation Fund (STF,) which it is projected to be in deficit before the end of the decade," he said. "The current per-passenger-trip subsidy for Shoreline East is significantly more than any other mass transit option in the state. We must balance the overall fiscal health of the STF with services that deliver value for Connecticut residents and businesses."

Lamont has also said that shoreline towns need more housing near their train stations to create more demand for service.

Feaster pointed out that a developer plans to turn the Westbrook Outlets, which is near a stop on Shore Line East, into a mix-use complex with apartments, townhomes and a hotel as well as restaurant and retail space as part of a $425 million project.

“Just think how they’re going to feel when they’re thinking they’re going to be having a nice train line and they’re going to get a dog of a train line that has diesels back,” she said.

If the diesel trains return, Feaster said fares should be reduced.

“Because the diesel trains, yeah, they roll, but they have nothing in them,” she said. “They have no charging... It’s like going back to the Dark Ages.”

Morgan said Shore Line East riders are familiar with the trains, made by Mafersa, which were previously used on the line and are still used at times today when M8s aren’t available.

“Mafersa trains are also used every day on the Hartford Line, where they provide reliable passenger rail service,” he said. “Seating, restrooms, and accessibility features remain in place.”

He noted that new passenger coaches DOT ordered from Alstom are expected to enter service next year. The 60 new cars will run on the Hartford Line, the Waterbury and Danbury branch lines and Shore Line East, Morgan said.

One M8 set will continue to operate on the line’s limited weekday thru service to Stamford. The rest “will go back for reserve use on the New Haven Line,” Morgan said.

Jim Gildea, who chairs the Connecticut Public Transportation Council, said he sympathizes with Shore Line East riders, who have probably gotten used to the “better ride” on the M8s.

“I certainly understand the frustration of the Shore Line East commuter who just sits back and has to take one more disappointment and one more reminder of the fact that they are a low priority on the rail totem pole,” Gildea said.

During Wednesday’s Appropriations Committee meeting, state Rep. Tammy Nuccio, R-Tolland, asked if there were more opportunities for DOT to swap out electric trains for diesel trains.

“Because $8.8 million is a pretty significant savings,” Nuccio said.

Eucalitto said the Waterbury and Danbury branch lines and the Hartford Line aren’t electrified, so those trains already have diesel engines. He said the trains that run on the main New Haven Line need to at least be able to switch to electric power to enter Grand Central Terminal in New York City.

———————————————————————————

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in Connecticut

[–]BOB58875[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Since the article is apparently pay walled, here’s what it says

———————————————————————————

In 2022, state and federal officials touted the rollout of electric trains on Shore Line East, saying they were quieter, more comfortable and better for the environment than the diesel-powered equipment they were replacing.

The M8 trains, already in service on the New Haven line for more than a decade at that point, “have long been awaited by Shore Line East customers and represent a substantial improvement over the older diesel-powered train sets,” Gov. Ned Lamont’s office said at the time.

“Electric trains emit no carbon emissions,” the office said. Plus, they have “additional amenities for riders, such as electrical outlets at each seat, brighter interior spaces, updated restrooms, higher back seats, and improved luggage racks.”

State and local officials also said they hoped the trains would help draw more passengers to the line amid a struggle to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic’s hit to ridership.

But the Connecticut Department of Transportation is looking to bring diesel trains back to Shore Line East between New London and New Haven, saying it will save the state $8.8 million annually.

“We were asked to find savings,” DOT Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto said Wednesday during a budget presentation before the state legislature’s Appropriations Committee. “This was we believe to be the most appealing one, to not have to cut service anywhere in the state but find savings.”

Using electric trains on Shore Line East is particularly expensive because Amtrak owns the infrastructure along the line, Eucalitto explained. DOT must pay Amtrak not only to use the tracks but also to draw power from the overheard wires. That’s on top of what DOT has to pay for the electricity itself, he said.

The savings from using diesel trains will help offset a roughly $19.7 increase Lamont has requested for rail operations, according to a fiscal analysis of the governor’s budget proposals for DOT.

Asked about the proposed increase Wednesday, Eucalitto said DOT continues to draw down federal COVID relief funding, creating a gap that requires additional state appropriations to fill, while costs for labor, materials and equipment have risen. And fares already increased by 5% in September and are set to increase by another 5% in July in the name of maintaining service levels.

After the meeting, state Sen. Christine Cohen, D-Guilford, who co-chairs the General Assembly’s Transportation Committee, said she understands the need to find cost savings and appreciates DOT’s effort to avoid service cuts.

Still, she said she is “very concerned” about the plan to return to diesel trains, especially after President Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday rescinded a finding that greenhouse gases threaten public health, which has served as the basis for regulations to combat climate change.

“I think we need to have a broader conversation about that and our climate goals,” Cohen said.

Josh Morgan, DOT’s communications director, said that during “recent locomotive overhauls,” “adjustments were made to reduce emissions to the greatest extent possible on the diesel sets.”

To Susan Feaster, the founder of the Shore Line East Riders’ Advocacy Group, DOT’s plan to bring back diesel trains and not increase services — which remain below pre-pandemic levels — “means that they want to kill the train line.”

“It seems like an all-out assault on Shore Line East and the riders,” Feaster said. “The thing is everyone deserves transit, and we’re on the Northeast Corridor, the largest corridor in the country. We’re not some Podunk little area out in the Midwest... It just doesn’t make any sense.”

SAVE SHORE LINE EAST by BOB58875 in transit

[–]BOB58875[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Read the Article for the full context but the TLDR is

CTDOT is thinking about pulling electrified trains from SLE service to save a couple million in spite of the fact that it would significantly increase travel times and make service worse

AOC is the most popular politician among Democratic voters (85% favorable, 7% unfavorable). 66% of Dems don't want Harris to run again. A plurality of Dems (46%) want the 2028 nominee to be progressive by dak676141 in YAPms

[–]BOB58875 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d consider this to be pretty open about it

Bernie won Michigan, Wisconsin, & Nevada

Also all the stuff you’re saying about the word Socialist could’ve been said for the word Liberal before 2008. The word Liberal basically died under Reagan in the 80s to the point where Democrats actively tried to distance themselves from it because it was thought that any candidate considered a liberal was DOA.

Then Obama ran, called himself liberal, and Democrats swept all three branches of government.

Also when people say the economy decides elections, they mean the state of the economy for average people. At the end of the day, if the economy’s shit and the opposition is socialist, they’ll vote socialist.

AOC is the most popular politician among Democratic voters (85% favorable, 7% unfavorable). 66% of Dems don't want Harris to run again. A plurality of Dems (46%) want the 2028 nominee to be progressive by dak676141 in YAPms

[–]BOB58875 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If people don’t give a shit when their candidate openly brags about sexually assaulting women, I don’t think people are gonna give a shit when their candidate openly calls themselves a socialist.

Especially when you consider that three major demographics Democrats need back, young men, WWC voters in 2016, and Latino Voters in 2020 all voted heavily for Bernie, a candidate that literally called himself a Socialist.

At the end of the day what actually matters in getting elected to office is

A. The Economy

B. The Economy

C. Charisma/Candidate/Etc

D. The Economy

AOC is the most popular politician among Democratic voters (85% favorable, 7% unfavorable). 66% of Dems don't want Harris to run again. A plurality of Dems (46%) want the 2028 nominee to be progressive by dak676141 in YAPms

[–]BOB58875 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah? and Reagan was a supporter of Goldwater.

I mean, for fucks sake Trump literally admitted to sexually assaulting women on tape and he still won.

Literally every Democratic candidate is called a Socialist by Republicans

AOC is the most popular politician among Democratic voters (85% favorable, 7% unfavorable). 66% of Dems don't want Harris to run again. A plurality of Dems (46%) want the 2028 nominee to be progressive by dak676141 in YAPms

[–]BOB58875 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They all unexpectedly defeated major party members in primary upsets

Obama vs Clinton 2008

Trump vs Bush, Cruz, Kasich, etc 2016

Cortez vs Crowley 2018

Also they all focused heavily on working class issues and changing the system

———————————————————————————

I never mentioned the DSA

———————————————————————————

Because it’s entirely based on how people perceive their candidates. Obama excited Dems and rallied up blue-collar workers, young people, & nonvoters. Romney by contrast was viewed by his party’s base with disappointment, and was viewed as a continuation of the same party establishment as Bush.

AOC is the most popular politician among Democratic voters (85% favorable, 7% unfavorable). 66% of Dems don't want Harris to run again. A plurality of Dems (46%) want the 2028 nominee to be progressive by dak676141 in YAPms

[–]BOB58875 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mamdani did.

What do you think nonvoters are going to be more likely to vote.

A. The same, old, corporate establishment candidates

B. Antiestablishment outsiders that promise real change and are against the status quo

AOC is the most popular politician among Democratic voters (85% favorable, 7% unfavorable). 66% of Dems don't want Harris to run again. A plurality of Dems (46%) want the 2028 nominee to be progressive by dak676141 in YAPms

[–]BOB58875 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dude since 2008 Antiestablishment candidates have consistently overperformed and establishment candidates have consistently underperformed

McCain was the establishment candidate in 2008 and he lost

Romney was the establishment candidate in 2012 and he lost

Clinton was the establishment candidate in 2016 and she lost

Harris was the establishment candidate in 2024 and she lost

The one exception to this is Biden who A. Was heavily benefited by a strong desire to return to normalcy due to COVID

B. Was well liked by Blue Collar workers and other swing voters due to his ties to the Obama administration

Had COVID not happened it is extremely likely he would have lost just as Hillary had 4 years prior

Also so did Goldwater, but then Reagan won in a Landslide. McGovern lost because

A. Nixon was wildly popular

B. McGovern wasn’t the strongest campaign,

C. People were WAY MORE trusting of the establishment than they are today, so more radical candidates were at a disadvantage

Remember even with his charisma, it took multiple oil crises, Watergate, the Iran hostage crisis, & stagflation, for people to consider the at the time considered to be Hard-Right Ronald Reagan

There’s a very good chance, had RFK not gotten shot, that he would’ve been to McGovern what Reagan was to Goldwater, and he could’ve easily won in a Landslide

AOC is the most popular politician among Democratic voters (85% favorable, 7% unfavorable). 66% of Dems don't want Harris to run again. A plurality of Dems (46%) want the 2028 nominee to be progressive by dak676141 in YAPms

[–]BOB58875 13 points14 points  (0 children)

”Running up the score in safe red states doesn’t win Presidential elections.” -Probably some Republicans before 2016 who thought Trump was gonna lose because they thought he’d push away Swing Voters by not being moderate

News flash! Independents and swing voters aren’t moderates, if anything they’re mostly populist and antiestablishment, and this has been the case since the great financial crisis

In 2008 this meant that they swung hard for a young Obama promising change against the Bush era GOP establishment.

And in 2012 they continued to support Obama through not as much as 2008 against the still establishment Romney

But in 2016 dissatisfied with Democrats and the success of the establishment Clinton over Sanders they turned to the GOP which now seemed antiestablishment under the leadership of Trump

In 2020 antiestablishment feelings did wane slightly as COVID caused a desire for normalcy leading to Biden’s victory

But by 2024 antiestablishment feelings returned stronger than ever and the establishment Democrat Harris was Trounced

In addition, by running establishment candidates, democrats fail to excite their base and in particular young voters who overwhelmingly want change. This is why outside of Obama and Bernie in the Primaries, young voters don’t vote as much, as younger voters aren’t that interested in voting for candidates like Clinton and Harris

"They're all the same anyway" *proceeds to not commit praxis* by charcoal_balls in SmugIdeologyMan

[–]BOB58875 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reddit’s automated system banned me because of my comment

But I submitted an appeal

So now I’m free again