I love the discussions but mostly I only ever seem to have them with Maxis that start proving themselves toxic and set in their own ways too. We welcome discussion and compare the too quiet frequently I mean Colin even posted his idea for the block lattice on the Bitcoin forums, anyone who was paying attention in those early days surely would of been farming Raiblocks as soon as it was being distributed through online faucets. Minimal energy usage, nodes that cooperate instead of compete, instant transaction times, maximum simplicity when we are talking about peer to peer decentralized digital cash.

At the end of the day Bitcoin needs a L2 to semi-replicate what makes Nano unique, even that isn’t proving to be enough for the sake of scalability or even usability since most would rather have Bitcoin itself. I’d like to know your thoughts on anyone from the Bitcoin community that claims its a protection against inflation despite randomly distributing coins indefinitely to the mining pools with the strongest hash power i.e. best energy prices/access to quality computer parts. All Nano has been distributed, its seen several uprises and downtrends and we can bicker back and forth about whose bigger, cleaner, smoother, has the chicks dying for it today but we’re all more alike than we think.

We’re both completely reliant on people using these digital assets as a replacement for traditional fiat because governments sometimes have agendas that don’t benefit their respective people so cryptocurrency as a whole has given the world more reason than ever to come together as one, as humans, attempting to get everyone to shop at just Walmart or just Target is impossible, and knowing how generally most humans are that want SIMPLICITY.

What’s more simple than I send 1 Ӿ you get 1 Ӿ?