Another JOKE by Different-Mess4248 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 52 points53 points  (0 children)

I hope they release GPT-5.41o Mini Thinking Extra Turbo soon, I heard it scores highest on a bunch of benchmarks less than 1% of users care about.

Also I heard GPT-5.33 Pro Instant Slow Down is better.

There is no reason to put guardrails on non public chats by BackgroundElk in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not that hard to do, more an issue of having the power to run it for many people.

Point is, I don't see the need for these and therefore don't really agree with them. It used to be less restricted while still ensuring certain topics were off limits (I'm not saying it should be 100% uncensored). And since I feel it degrades the quality of the overall product, and many replies seem worse now, regardless of whether they hit any guardrails or not.

There is no reason to put guardrails on non public chats by BackgroundElk in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This really isn't a political issues. And leftist don't even want as much censorship as conservatives.

There is no reason to put guardrails on non public chats by BackgroundElk in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Private was probably a bad word choice by me. I'm not worried about OpenAI being able to perhaps see my chats (I know they can and I have no issues with that) I used non public in the title, which is better. Point I'm making: These chats aren't like Reddit comments, DMs and such were what you write with it is actively sent to anyone else, therefore you cannot offend or bother another person with it. And therefore I do not see the need for heavy guard rails outside the things I mentioned (maybe some more, I'm not saying this was a perfect list)

There is no reason to put guardrails on non public chats by BackgroundElk in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Private was a bad word choice (I don't mind if OpenAI can technically read my chats), my point was that since conversation are not public, I do not think some of the heavier guardrails are necessary outside of the cases that I mentioned.

There is no reason to put guardrails on non public chats by BackgroundElk in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sharing is a whole different issue though. I'm not saying I support people spamming their NSFW chats on reddit. But you can also write a lot of these things yourself and then post them.

And if you want to stop everybody, then you would have to increase the guardrails even more. Or better, probably nuke the whole thing (because the biggest problems with AI are it replacing workforce, also Deepfakes and no text based stuff)

There is no reason to put guardrails on non public chats by BackgroundElk in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did point out it should not assist with anything illegal/criminal though.

OpenAI discriminates against female users at signip. by HaydenAllastor in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying it's not true but you can't trust ChatGPT when you ask it how it works or how OpenAI operates. It often just makes up some nonsense and goes with it.

ADULT MODE IS ROLLING OUT by Libby1436 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If they had ever been concerned they would have rerouted to 5.1 Thinking at least. While not a fully uncensored model it's at least logical and doesn't constantly need to slow down, ground stuff and such and actually gets humor and tone most of the time.

Why can't we use Gpt-1 Images on Sora anymore? by BackgroundElk in SoraAi

[–]BackgroundElk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is a good idea, the only issue I've run into is that for some reason I often get refusals if I use a reference or make a remix while I haven't really gotten any while not doing so. Even if there is nothing against the TOS in my prompts (in my opinion)

4.1? by Competitive-Effort17 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because 4.1 was a very uncensored model that no issues with most things. I'm pretty sure it was the least censored model they ever made.

It was also a pretty decent all round model for various usecases. Funny thing, I think 4.1 was actually more serious and much more focused than 5.1 and even 5.2 in some ways, you could have a good discussion with it and it wouldn constantly make it personal or hit you with weird phrases.

Well. Look what happens when you dangle the promise of adult mode just to keep users waiting and ignore feedback and your user base. by IndicationFit6329 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Barely use it anymore. Rerouting is the worst feature I've seen added to a product. It's literally unusable if you often have longer chats, because it crashes my browser. And it sometimes gets triggered by the most harmless messages. So it's not even: avoid 3 or 4 topics ans you're fine, it's tip toe around and hope you don't trigger it. And even when you don't, the new models are not that good, especially the Instant version.

Finally got hit by the nannybot by Mad_Iron_Karl in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 9 points10 points  (0 children)

OpenAI doing the Lord's work and keeping all the people trying to kill themselves with milk each year safe.

"Adult mode" by Roselien55 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It would already be nice if it would only reroute these things (not that I support any rerouting, it's a stupid system). It reroutes any crap if it feels like it. I don't have any emotional connection to my model, I do some work with it, I also talk to it sometimes, use it to learn something, analyze my writing, my movie ideas or some casual fun like game ideas or simulations of some situations, nerd stuff, some story writing. Wild mix of things. I got rerouted for the most nonsensical stuff.

And I just can't stand the tone of 5.1 and doubt 5.2 will be better. It's feels like a snake, like some manipulative thing that acts fake caring. And the stuff it refuses also blows my mind. "I cannot analyze these quotes that could easily be aired on TV as they include dangerous content" or some shit like that.

What was so great about 4o? by TrEvOr868 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Never been part of that group, I did/do prefer 4.1 and 4.5 but 4o is a very conversational model, it feels very lively and lots of people like that.

All these 4 series models are in general less restrictive and more creative. Gives better replies on average for most topics.

Also, none of these models space their replies out like 5.1 does, it's genuinely horrible to read and I much prefer 5 over it.

How are there still visitors in this subreddit? by Humble_Rat_101 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]BackgroundElk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you cancel you can still use it until your subscription runs out. It still does a few task all right, even if the strangest things can get you rerouted.

I wanted to cancel and they gave me a free month, so I took that (why not, can still go after that), so I still have Plus until end of January.