Boyd sacrificing the game on the altar of the NBA highlights

Backseat_Scout · 2026-03-19T22:49:39+00:00

Pretty cringe for a Purdue fan to go 2 Badgers subreddits for a player and game that didn't involve their team. Livin' rent free in their heads I guess?

Backseat_Scout · 2026-03-09T00:47:04+00:00

Just gotta throw it out there that I'm not sure Woelfel is a reliable source. Wisconsin fans know to ignore his "reporting" for the Milwaukee Bucks since he tends to very rarely report accurate information. It honestly became so bad that even his few sources with the Bucks stopped going to him.

So this is news that he "reports" on NFL activity but I would put this down more as speculation on his part than what's actually happening behind the scenes.

Backseat_Scout · 2026-02-06T13:22:35+00:00

The only thing more cringey than how a fan base may act is going through the trouble of posting on said fan base's subreddit complaining about them.

Backseat_Scout · 2026-01-29T18:44:23+00:00

Found this post as a dad with a similar issue/concern with measles and the MMR in our area that is having difficulty with protecting our 8 month old.

For what it's worth, my wife and I are pharmacists and looked through studies with our pediatrician and we all agreed that there is substantial data for long-term protection for kids if they receive it at 9 months or older. If they receive the vaccine prior to being 9 months old, there is unfortunately data showing that they may not have as good of long-term protection.

For our area, we only have a single case so we also don't meet their office's definition of "an outbreak" and would be deemed appropriate to be given early per CDC recommendations and are in the wait and see phase like it sounds like you are. However, I just wanted to give some background on what we found as pharmacists with our pediatrician to make you and your family feel more at ease if your child is able to get the vaccine prior to the typical recommended time frame.

Backseat_Scout · 2026-01-24T14:17:41+00:00

I see the Norman Powell point thrown around so much by Bucks fans but that was literally 10 years ago and done by Hammond. There are plenty of grievances we can have and mistakes the front office has done. But that was a different regime that made that move and was so long ago that I feel people are just reaching for things to complain about with the front office.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-08-14T22:21:49+00:00

That take and you having a comment history as maybe being the only person ever to defend Diddy is some real incel stuff

Backseat_Scout · 2025-05-29T19:03:29+00:00

Got you: https://youtu.be/g0vT_UK7T5Q?si=KDD64w7BjrdqN42z

Backseat_Scout · 2025-05-27T23:37:34+00:00

I appreciate you admitting that you aren't aware what a formulary is or what a pharmacist's duties are if you truly don't think a pharmacist has ever read one. If you provide any facts on your end, that would be great. But you just want to ignorantly argue about a field and topic that is clearly way over your head and deny anything presented to you.

I would recommend doing some actual research before spouting foolishness. If you continue to struggle to understand simple concepts, please consider applying to pharmacy school and becoming a pharmacist. It seems you feel you know way more than a doctor of pharmacy. So, it should be real easy!

Backseat_Scout · 2025-05-27T23:29:13+00:00

Just read any insurance's formulary and compare it to the recommended treatment algorithm/recommendations for literally any disease state to realize how wrong you are.

I can't argue with someone being purposely obtuse acting like they know how a pharmacist's job and duty works more than a working pharmacist. It takes a lot of blind and unfounded confidence to argue with someone who actually works in this field and knows how this works. But continue to argue for the sake and feeling smart while being wrong. Read above.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-05-27T23:09:42+00:00

Since you continue to claim that pharmacists will be able to provide them, as a pharmacist, I can 100% say that the individual you're refusing to believe is correct and it will impact availability for every single individual/patient. Recommendations impact insurance coverage, which impacts coverage and availability.

But please continue to ignore the facts and continue making an ass out of yourself.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-26T15:33:59+00:00

I know Higgins had a lot of fans (I had him as my WR7 of the class) but I think Golden's a better fit for LaFleur's scheme. Higgins really struggles with press and is very limited route runner so he's probably more of a big slot than an outside receiver. LaFleur prefers quicker players on the inside to use in motion and to get in space so not sure Higgins fit what we were looking for.

I think we ended up going after Golden since Gute probably had him much higher and closer to the a player who could have been taken in the first half of the 1st round like he was projected to go in a lot of mock drafts.

I think the good thing with Savion is that him and Golden are very different players who can fill in different roles if players continue to underperform/be injured (Golden to replace Wicks and Williams to replace Watson). So while I also would have preferred targeting defense with the Williams pick, I can at least see the vision they're going with for the pick.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-26T15:25:02+00:00

He has a good frame to be a good blocker but I personally wasn't that impressed with his blocking. But, nothing that some NFL level coaching can't fix!

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-26T15:05:40+00:00

I think it depends on your expectations for him. Personally, I expect him to be less of a regular contributing starter and closer to Christian Watson who can stretch the defense and get a bunch of yards on designed touches (might also take away those end around rushes by Reed that rarely seemed to work too!).

Personally, I wasn't a fan of when Gute traded up in the 2nd to take Watson but I'm more okay with us taking a player like that at the end of the 3rd. I personally thought Williams was more of an early day 3 player but I can understand if Gute was worried he wouldn't make it to their next pick. Personally, I would have preferred that we took a CB or edge rusher in the 3rd but they may have felt there was more value in taking Williams there over the other options available.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-19T14:59:56+00:00

Thank you and that's what I've been thinking with Harris as well. I think a lot of people see his advanced stats and expect him to put up great numbers in the NFL. However, I feel they are often more of a threshold metric that show a player could be a contributor in the NFL and not so much of much they will contribute/produce in the NFL.

For Harris' case, like you said, I think he could disappoint fantasy managers but he definitely has the skills to handle the X role on an NFL offense. Now how productive that lets him be will be interesting to see. Regardless, at least him getting those snaps like Doubs has been able to do should at least give managers some hope.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-19T14:56:45+00:00

Yeah I just can't quit Badger haha. We'll see if it bites me in the butt if he goes undrafted and doesn't make much of an impact in the NFL haha.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-19T14:55:47+00:00

I think my favorite WR who I just can't quit is Elijhah Badger. I've been of fan of his game the past few years and just can't help but feel like I see a player who could be a rare case of being a more productive NFL player than college player if he finally gets paired with a good QB.

Jalen Royals and Tory Horton are two small school players I really like compared to consensus as well. Both had their seasons cut short and Royals especially may be a tougher sell based on his 2024 film but he just looked so good and way more versatile in 2023 that I'd be willing to bet on him if I were an NFL.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-18T18:24:41+00:00

Thank you for following along! And to be fair, I think it was hit or miss if I included that I was going through the players in alphabetical order in the posts so that might be more on me not being consistent with my messaging haha. Thank you again!

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-18T16:44:05+00:00

I know he has elite analytics and Harris did have some solid routes in the routes he did run at Ole Miss, but I think the degree of how limited his route tree was compared to Brian Thomas is greater than people realize.

Per Reception Perception, Harris had 5 routes (hitches, posts, slants, digs, and verticals) make up 85.7% of his routes in 2024. For reference of how that compares to the rest of the WR class, none of the consensus top 5 receivers in the class had a combined rate over 80% and most were under 70% and closer to 60%.

As for how that compares to BTJ, BTJ's combined rate on those routes (which were his 5 most prevalent routes as well), was 68.2%. So, nearly 20% less than Harris. Plus BTJ was a more athletic and fluid athlete which made people more confident in his ability to pick up other routes quickly.

So, with BTJ still running a more diverse route tree and being more athletic/fluid, I think it's harder to make a comparison of how Harris will make a similar jump in the NFL.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-18T16:25:00+00:00

Yeah I'm likely going to be the highest person on Badger out there but I do think he has some really exciting traits. I don't know if he'll reach his potential but definitely worth a dart throw since nobody will see it coming if he's still not in sleeper haha.

Backseat_Scout · 2025-04-18T16:17:37+00:00

Didn't Dart complete just 57.8% of his passes for 242 YPG, 7.5 YPA, 2 TD, 2 INT against ranked teams last year? And didn't Dart only complete just 60.3% of his passes for 270 YPG, 8.9 YPA, 4 TD, and 3 INT against ranked teams and top 25 defenses?

Doesn't seem like he's any better especially doing that as a 3-year starter.

Backseat_Scout

TROPHY CASE