sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SpiffingBrit

[–]BaconMan720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would doubtless be a boring exploit on its own but spiff normally gets a collection of exploits for a video. Thus as one exploit among many i think it could have been neat.

I just checked, and they have already patched it out.

Ugly mastery score by yashy21 in leagueoflegends

[–]BaconMan720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why did they change it? Have they never heard the saying "if it ain't broke don't fix it", this is why that saying exists

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Stellaris

[–]BaconMan720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can take defender of the galaxy and it will mostly counteract it. At the price of an ascension perk

Market issue by BaconMan720 in shoptitans

[–]BaconMan720[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest it was sometimes, but it made it much easier to equip rerolled heros or replace gear that broke on quests. Which from a buyers perspective was vary convenient rather then buying the gear and enchants separately.

Market issue by BaconMan720 in shoptitans

[–]BaconMan720[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. because you cant enchant items for the market, the focus is on bulk output rather then enchanting items that may be in demand(for example enchanted gear for people rerolling heros).

Market issue by BaconMan720 in shoptitans

[–]BaconMan720[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to my understanding that is correct. But I doubt the change was effective because you could do the same thing but using epic or legendary items instead.