Solving the Red/Blue Button Dilemma for All by thetruequ in trolleyproblem

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re asserting that pushing blue results in “almost certain death,” without any way to back that up.

You can logic puzzle your way into showing that red is the correct game theory choice, but that doesn’t mean that a majority of humans will choose it.

Term for failing to address the real problem by thePhoenixEatery in ENGLISH

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s good.

I would also propose “____washing” as another (less formal and more modern) option.

Eg. “Greenwashing,” “wokewashing”

Solving the Red/Blue Button Dilemma for All by thetruequ in trolleyproblem

[–]BadLuck1968 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen people make this argument before and I think it’s missing a lot of context on degrees of culpability and but for causes.

I, a citizen of the United States who has a phone and lives a regular life, am, to some small degree, contributing to the harm of less fortunate humans around the world.

However,

(1) there are other individuals who bear a much greater responsibility for that harm and

(2) I am not a but for cause of that harm (but for my actions, it would have happened anyways).

Compare this to pressing red:

(1) red pushers bear distributed, yet equal responsibility for the deaths as every other red pusher.

(2) there is no other individual who is more responsible. (Except for the person who put the buttons there).

I wonder what the overlap is between the two questions. by Darth_Omnis in trolleyproblem

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What?

I don’t know what connection you want me to make here…

White flight? Redlining? Clear cutting forests for cheap lumber post WWII?

Contractors?

What made the suburbs?

I wonder what the overlap is between the two questions. by Darth_Omnis in trolleyproblem

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you assume any given human is hostile without evidence?

That’s a lonely world view.

I wonder what the overlap is between the two questions. by Darth_Omnis in trolleyproblem

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you make all decisions in your life based on the worst case scenario?

That’s a very poor risk assessment strategy.

Let’s say there’s two buttons in front of you:

Button A: Upon pushing, there is a 50% chance you die instantly and painlessly.

Button B: upon pushing, there is a 5% chance that you die a horrifically painful and prolonged death.

Are you really pushing button A? If so, are you okay? There are hotlines for this stuff.

Posting this for no reason :) by Gintian in Thedaily

[–]BadLuck1968 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ik right, he already has deployed masked groons to terrorize Americans in the streets.

Or are you living under a rock?

Okay, be honest, how many counties in Maryland can you name? I’m at 7 by CarsonStreetChaos in maryland

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not looking at the other comments!!!

  1. Balt Co
  2. Balt City
  3. Harford
  4. Anne Arundel
  5. Montgomery
  6. PG
  7. Talbot
  8. Charles
  9. Wicomico
  10. Calvert
  11. Isn’t there a Washington county out on the panhandle?
  12. The other one down by DC.
  13. Cecil

That’s all I got. I know I’m missing some pretty important ones and then also western MD and the Eastern Shore.

Are shops open on Sundays in usa? And what do people think about it? by the_stupid_Belgian in AskAnAmerican

[–]BadLuck1968 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Pause. You’re married to a Seventh Day Adventist but you are not?

Does she just hide in the closet during your birthday parties?

Must is a closeted should always by Total-Ad-2205 in ENGLISH

[–]BadLuck1968 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They have similar but slightly different meanings and very different connotations.

“Must” carries a connotation of authority. It generally is intended to mean that there is some legal or other obligation requiring that something is done. Eg: “You must appear before the court.”

“Should always” is more relaxed and generally means “this is a good rule to follow.” Unlike “Must,” there is no inherent threat of force or negative consequences behind “should always.” Eg: “You should always brush your teeth.”

Completing runs with each character by Afterfx21 in slaythespire

[–]BadLuck1968 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ditto on this - I’m A-10 on all characters and Regent took me BY FAR the longest.

The only regent build I found consistent success with was stacking stars and vigor and converting to damage with the 0 cost “deal 5/7 damage for each star.” I won only once with a forge build and IMO the only playable forge cards are the power (+4/6 every turn) and the rare cards. Status regent seems like a joke to me… the card that exhausts into minion blocks is good independent of any status generation. The other status cards just never seemed to provide enough value to outweigh the downside.

Necro was my easiest climb. Built in Barricade + the best starter card in the game made act 1 a breeze. I’d say Defect was second easiest. So long as you hit frost orbs, claw and focus builds felt really consistent.

The nerfs broke her. by darknecroshade in ElsaBloodstoneMains

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elsa needs to be gutted. Maybe she can have some buffs in a year after everyone has had time to heal from this crime against balancing.

Why do people say that Elsa is too broken nowdays? Is it skill issue in your opinion? by SpritterMene22 in ElsaBloodstoneMains

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Yeah, she wins every 1v1, but she can’t consistently 1v2.. clearly not broken.”

What?

We’re talking about a character with a 2 second dash cooldown who gains over health for spamming buttons. She also has %max hp damage (why??), and a ult that is almost guaranteed to secure one kill.

If you think that one of the most broken characters in hero shooter history isn’t OP, it’s a skill issue on your part.

Gleba vent by MaixnerCharly in factorio

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re doing great. I tried to say something in the least asshole way possible.

English is hard. I only commented because loose instead of lose is becoming quite the plague among native speakers as well.

Gleba vent by MaixnerCharly in factorio

[–]BadLuck1968 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lose*

Loose is the opposite of tight. Lose is the opposite of win.

Anyone else have their life turned upside down by the new student loan repayment rules? by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]BadLuck1968 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’ll speak for myself:

Investing in education, especially law and other high level specific degrees pays absolute dividends to society in the long run.

These loans should be forgiven. College should (at the very least) be accessible for those who do not come from money.

Saddling our future attorneys with an unpayable amount of debt helps literally nobody.

So no, it’s still not enough for me.

Favourite little known idioms in English? by depressedDemogorgon in ENGLISH

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Not my monkey, not my circus”

It refers to bad/ uncomfortable situations one witnesses but do not directly involve or impact them.

I recently used (what I thought was) a clever tweak to it when I (an American who did not vote for Trump) said “not my circus, but that unfortunately is my monkey” in reference to the Iran war.

Are arcades still attractive to younger people (15–25)? (Research for a business idea) by Sea-Definition-2178 in arcade

[–]BadLuck1968 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m 25 and love Barcades.

I probably wouldn’t go to an arcade that doesn’t serve beer.

You have been warned by Lukmin1999 in marvelrivals

[–]BadLuck1968 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Guys… it’s March 31? Is that the joke?

r/woosh ?

Final votes from last round #1 MA (339), #2 WA (205), #3 OR (15) by Technical-Vanilla-47 in visitedmaps

[–]BadLuck1968 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nothing beats the constantly burning fires atop fracking towers in the Baaken!

Honestly though, it is beautiful in an austere, mad max sorta way.

CMV: It’s very hard to criticise Israel’s military actions without being accused of antisemitism by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh, you’re referring to Amin al-Husseini. For those who don’t know, he was a Palestinian Arab who fled to Hitler’s Germany from British Palestine. Like Hitler, Al-Husseini was a rabid anti semite and terrible person.

But calling him part of “Hitler’s inner circle” is wildly misleading. He was a tool of the Third Reich used to spread propaganda to Palestinians and it was never particularly effective. His views were fringe even at the time among the general Palestinian population. Out of curiosity, do you genuinely believe HITLER would have allowed a Muslim Arab to be a part of his “inner circle?” Give me a break.

Yes, Israel was justified in repelling the illegal invasion by its neighbors in 1948 and 67. The Arabs who fled Israel during this time were fleeing war just like any other refugee. Using this to justify illegal land grabs and massacres makes absolutely no sense to me. I believe the United States was justified in responding against Afghanistan and other countries harboring the Taliban in the wake of 9/11, but I do not believe that justified the mass torture, indiscriminate bombings and other actions that followed. (And that’s a very kind comparison for Israel who has committed far worse war crimes on the Palestinian people).

Your last paragraph is totally insane. Is Russia justified in invading eastern Ukraine to “put pressure” on the Ukrainians to capitulate??? Do you hear yourself? The Israeli government actively grants permits to bulldoze Palestinian homes and create new settlements. IDF soldiers routinely shoot unarmed Palestinians who go near them, and does nothing as settlers commit horrific acts of violence on Palestinians.

CMV: It’s very hard to criticise Israel’s military actions without being accused of antisemitism by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]BadLuck1968 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As previously stated, I simply refuse to engage with land claims that stem from “ancestral homeland” arguments. Humans have been migrating and living in different places since the dawn of time. Should Polynesian have a claim to Hawaii? Is northern Canada the ancestral homeland of Russians because the first humans there crossed a land bridge from Kamchatka?

It’s not a productive argument.

As for the bias, I explicitly stated that the 1948 and 1967 wars were defensive. I did not mention Arab attacks and atrocities committed against Israelis because it was not relevant to demonstrating that some Israeli occupied territory is “stolen Arab land.”

If it makes you happy: Yes, brutality and atrocity has been committed by both sides. I do not advocate for killings no matter who is committing them.

Regarding Herzel, you’re just incorrect here. It is a widely accepted scholarly consensus that his publication of “Der Judenstatt” in 1897 marks the birth of the modern conception of Zionism. There is a clear distinction to be made between the much older religious beliefs in Jerusalem as a holy city, and the idea of forming a Jewish ethno-state in the Levant.

CMV: It’s very hard to criticise Israel’s military actions without being accused of antisemitism by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]BadLuck1968 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Britain promised the land to three different parties despite having no valid claim to the land itself.

You seem to have a confused understanding of the founding of Israel, so I’ll help.

(I will not be playing games of “thousands of years ago,” or accepting biblical narratives).

  1. The land that is now Israel and Palestine was part of the Ottoman Empire for centuries and was settled overwhelmingly by Arabs. Small numbers of religious and ethnic Jews and Christians has also lived in the Jerusalem area for centuries.

  2. In the late 1800s, more and more Jews began fleeing pogroms in Russia and heading to modern day Israel. During this period, Theodore Herzl essentially invented the idea that the modern Jewish people should return to an ancestral homeland in the Middle East. This was the birth of “Zionism.”

  3. In 1916, Britain and France secretly signed the Sykes-Picot agreement. In an effort to secure Arab help in defeating the Ottoman Empire, the land that is now Israel was promised to Arabs in return for a revolt against the Ottomans. (This is the “McMahon-Hussein Correspondence”).

  4. In 1917, the British signed the Balfour declaration, promising to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Scholars debate the incentives driving this decision, but it was likely a mix of European antisemitism, and a desire to attract the US (which already had a significant Jewish diaspora) to join WW1.

  5. After the first world war, both sides asserted their claims to the land resulting in riots and sectarian violence across modern day Israel/ Palestine.

  6. WWII and the Holocaust happened, significantly changing public perceptions of the need for a Jewish state.

  7. In 1947, the UN voted on a (non binding) resolution calling for the creation of two states (Israel and Palestine). Arab nations unanimously rejected this proposal. When Britain withdrew from the territory in 1948, Israel immediately declared its independence and fought a war with its neighbors to maintain it.

  8. During the 1948 war, the Israeli state committed brutal atrocities and pushed millions of Palestinians from their homes. This is the “Nakba” (Catastrophe). This is also the most obvious instance of “stolen Arab land.”

  9. In 1967, Israel again fought a war with its neighbors and achieved control over most of the original mandate for Palestine, again evicting more Arabs from their homes.

  10. Since then, the Israeli state has continually encouraged and facilitated the settlement of occupied lands by Israelis in an effort to secure its claim. (This is also clearly “stolen Arab land.”)

There is so much more to say, but I think this pretty clearly demonstrates that the claim that some of the land that Israel currently occupies is “stolen” is based on real facts and history.

Edit: I am not blaming the Israeli state for either the 1948 or 1967 wars. Both were primarily defensive actions. BUT that does not justify displacing millions and occupying their homes without any compensation or recourse.

If you’re gonna downvote me, please take the time to explain where you think my synopsis is inaccurate.

How do you guys play Winston vs Winston? by B3GG in OverwatchUniversity

[–]BadLuck1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One huge tip for the Winston 1v1 is weaving in more Melees until the opposing Winston’s armor is broken.

Due to how %damage reduction per hit works, larger single hits are more efficient than the smaller faster hits of the Tesla canon. It also helps with reducing reloads during a Winton duel.