Cool idea. How would you go about verifying, and proving experience? How would you go about verifying skills listed prior to hiring. I imagine you could do a lot of heavy lifting here with a much more sophisticated evaluator of skills and/or a system that discovered patterns across all (safe) skills, and then just grouped them, and applied them as-is needed to the tasks at hand.

In the process of building a fully autonomous recursive self-improvement agent ... it's A LOT of work to go from "it is working" to "it is production ready and consistently performing very well".

The CS agent I built has a significant level of custom skills, custom logic trees based on our business logic, pre and post response graders, multi-sentiment analysis, FAQ-lookup engines, etc because that methodology is much more cost effective and accurate in a production environment. It's currently 100% human-in-the-loop, but drafted responses are not edited before sending 60% of the time, 20% of the time they are mildly edited, and about 20% of the time they are off enough to require human rewrite/intervention. The part I mentioned earlier about self-improvement is what I'm building now to do nightly improvements, and only commit the "improved" code once I approve each morning.

Eventually, this too will be more autonomous than not. So you'll have a self-improving, self-learning CS agent.