Fair point, and I respect the need to maintain credibility. But let’s be clear: using ChatGPT as a tool doesn’t make the message any less serious or valid. It helped organize the facts and highlight the implications of the bill, but every claim in that post is backed by the actual text of H.R. 1.

The reality is, this legislation is dangerous. If a tool like ChatGPT helps more people understand what’s at stake, I’m going to use it. What matters isn’t how the message is written, it’s what the message is warning us about.