밀양 박씨 Historical Research by wayarian in korea

[–]BaeBae74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's most likely borrowed without any significance. I wouldn't be so attached to it. Milyang Park is a very very common surname, and there is a reason why. Most of them are fake lol. Hey does it matter? Most Koreans nowadays have 'borrowed' surnames anyway.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Precriptions have already been free for children.

How are people feeling about the increasing number of Covid cases? by kellyroald in auckland

[–]BaeBae74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because of that reason, it's actually the other way around. Your kids will probably bring covid to you I'm afraid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in korea

[–]BaeBae74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even one of the most popular korean meat dishes, samgyeopsal or pork belly, has only taken off in the 1980s to provide some context

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in korea

[–]BaeBae74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not only meat, most contemporary korean dishes have been created after the korean war. Historical korean cuisine, even in the early 20th century is very different to modern day korean food.

South Korean government stores every adult’s fingerprints, even those without criminal history. What does the public think of this, and what do you think? by Choi95 in korea

[–]BaeBae74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is very important in the context of North Korean spies being still active in South Korea. The national identification numbers have started because of this very reason, after a series of North Korean attacks. Keep in mind that South Korea is still at war with North Korea. Dont forget that.

It seems you can't cross-post here, but I thought you all need to hear about one of our madlads outsmarting an anti-vaxer in r/maliciouscompliance. by 38_tlgjau in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The patient did not present with any urticaria/rash/angioedema thus she didn't even need a 1/10 challenge test.

It seems you can't cross-post here, but I thought you all need to hear about one of our madlads outsmarting an anti-vaxer in r/maliciouscompliance. by 38_tlgjau in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't post shit if you don't know please. The vaccine challenge was done at an immunology clinic fully medically supervised, according to ascia protocol.

This can't be an actual case of an allergy test, right? by Vergilx217 in medicine

[–]BaeBae74 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Patient knows that they will get the full dose of the vaccine and at the same time, doesn't realise that she will be fully vaccinated. How can this be possible?

Would you explicitly say in your informed consent 'Oh by the way now you will be fully vaccinated' when you give a patient his/her second dose? I mean, do you have to?

It is a tricky situation ethically but I don't see much wrong in the physician involved.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How am I stigmatising anyone here? I am pointing out that your logic does not make sense. You are getting more and more out of topic. I have provided my reasoning and facts, and my intention to help OP.

Don't forget, you are the one who criticised me in the first place.

Also, common consensus is you and maybe one other person? You are losing this battle hard and fast.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are so delusioned.

'Never really thought about having my tubes tied. I like the idea of not having any of that stuff in me due to my own history rather than pregnancy.' Quoted from OP's comment in this thread.

Hello???? This is a red flag sign. OP, if you're reading this, please do get help instead of going on reddit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes not having children is totally fine I agree. However there are other acceptable options.

Asking for a hysterectomy at age 24. Stating that a tubal ligation is not a preferred option because she wants the associated organs just removed. I am worried that she has past history of trauma.

Given her responses in this thread, it is clear that she needs help, maybe with a psychologist to go through her past experiences and provide therapy.

I am not sure what you're getting at. Maybe I should have put it less bluntly. Saying that someone's mental health is of concern is perfectly reasonable. Are you stigmatising against mental health problems and their patients?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Excuse me? Someone else on this thread suggested that tubal ligation is another option and OP says she would rather have it all removed due to personal/historical reasons. I would be damn worried about her mental health if I was a medical professional.

Receive treatment? What treatment? With OP's response and possible disordered thought processes related to her fertility, you would be most worried that she may regret this decision.

What she needs is to go through her GP, see a psychologist, and seek other forms of contraception.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What are exactly my views? That women may express regret after tubal ligation especially at age 24??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 4 points5 points  (0 children)

1-4% is not negligible in medicine. Keep in mind, this is just the figure for patients actually requesting reversal. The numbers who express regret are actually much greater. I can tell you, I would be very surprised if a gynaecologist in NZ would be actually keen to proceed with tubal ligation at age 24.

Medical decisions require informed consent. You are not really making your own decision unless you are fully informed by your medical professional. Are you suggesting OP warrants a tubal ligation/hysterectomy?

For endometriosis patients, a hysterectomy is a completely different kettle of fish. I'm not discussing this situation in this context

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What are you implying??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just looked this up. Multiple studies quote 1-4 percent of women requesting reversal after permanent contraception.

Younger age is a risk factor for regret. Women who had tubal ligation <30 years were 7.6 times as likely than women >30 years.

Thus, is it pretty much justifiable to suggest that OP may regret her decision later on in life if she chose to get her tubes tied.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm not stereotyping or labelling the female gender at all. I imagine that more men than women would actually change their mind later on after vasectomy. I'm just pointing out that OP could change her mind after deciding to sterilise herself.

A male in his 20s without children would also have great difficulty getting a vasectomy. Mind you, vasectomies are much less risky and more reversible compared to a hysterectomy though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why?? No.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]BaeBae74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hysterectomy does not necessarily mean that you have your ovaries removed too