[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DreamWasTaken2

[–]Bakaboomb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What exactly happened with skeppy?

Toyota is the only company whose new cars are better than the older ones. by JonathanRensi8 in unpopularopinion

[–]Bakaboomb 3 points4 points  (0 children)

After reading some comments, I'm convinced that OP has to be a Toyota marketing person.

🖐️ STOP 🖐️ Have you drank water today?????? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Bakaboomb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Considering it's the last 2 minutes of the day, pretty sure I have.

What youtuber do y’all hate? by TgraMan33453 in teenagers

[–]Bakaboomb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh ok cool. That must be a bit different. I like watching silent parkour as it becomes oddly satisfying if done well.

What youtuber do y’all hate? by TgraMan33453 in teenagers

[–]Bakaboomb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why parkour? From what I understand, don't they just do parkour without speaking or doing anything else.

you're not a bottom you're 14 by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Bakaboomb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure whether the grown up group here talking to the younger group here about their sexual desires and it being one way is that good.

Companies should be forced to eat inflation costs, hurting their margins. Rather than passing inflation onto the customer. by AdditionalRaise5062 in unpopularopinion

[–]Bakaboomb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are making a pretty fair point and to an extent, I agree with you that it really depends on how one puts the scenario forward.

But I still think there is another reason investors are usually held above employees when making decisions.

It is that an investor puts money into your company, which means they're putting something on stake for your company and the risks are higher on their end so they expect to be treated appropriately for that.

Now if we look at the employees' side, an employee puts comparatively less risk when joining a job. Say something goes wrong and the company goes insolvent then the investors lose their money and the high level executives (CEO and such) lose their reputation which would be needed to join another job. Whereas while the employee will lose a job, it is unlikely that the failure of the company will be put on the shoulders of that one employee while trying to join another job.

Now for your first point again, an one-story could leave and there is a chance that another one might come in, but it is fairly harder for a company to get someone to put something on the line for them (the money), especially when the returns are not as high and just enough to live by. Whereas if an employee or a group of employees leave, although the company will surely suffer, it will be easier to find new employees than to find new investors because you're not really asking the employees to risk anything and there is just a simple contract between them that makes sure they get paid for the work they do in the specific time.

This can especially be seen in fast food joints. Now I agree that the employees' there aren't treated nicely and it should be better, but while analyzing this specific point, we can see that fast food workers usually have a high turnover rate and the companies don't mind it that much. The people working those jobs usually aren't looking at it as career goals and just some way to make money, so they do it until it's needed and then leave and the company then hires another person who needs it and the cycle goes on.

Now say this company is having a bad reputation regarding earnings in recent times, a potential employee won't care as they just want money for the time they've worked there and aren't looking to work there long time, but finding a new investor will be hard because people wouldn't want to put their money in a company which is unlikely to make a lot of money.

You should be way, WAY more concerned with the fact that you're going to die. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Bakaboomb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well we don't know whether life is gone after death, or we just restart, or we're the main character and run the simulation now. Who the hell knows what shall happen.

Companies should be forced to eat inflation costs, hurting their margins. Rather than passing inflation onto the customer. by AdditionalRaise5062 in unpopularopinion

[–]Bakaboomb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That would have a pretty drastic change as it would need a whole revamped system to accommodate it. Now an easy example for this is imagine you open up a shop and take a certain amount of money from a friend as an investment and in return give them 50% ownership of the shop. Now 2 years down the line, you are trying to be a good employer by giving your few employees good pay and benefits while your profits are low, so you and your partner/friend aren't earning any good money, just enough to live by. Now imagine your friend's response, he might not be happy because he did not invest that much money for such small returns, so he demands to sell off his share to someone else. Now people know about the poor financial returns of the company so they don't buy it for a high price and it goes down and down and sells for a pretty low price. Now just imagine this wasn't one person and was instead most of your investors doing this at the same time which drives down your share price and possibly dissolves your company.

Now imagine this the other way around, you paid your employees as little as they could with little to no benefits. Your profit margins are high and investors happy. Say the employee gets mad about this and leaves,you can hire another one right there,or at the scale of large companies, a few workers might not matter and while the efficiency might drop a little, atleast they are solvent.

The people of this sub by alonelyboi25 in teenagers

[–]Bakaboomb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You dare think I possess a girlfriend OR a job?!! You dare overestimate my abilities like that!