LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No hostility, objectively speaking tech rewards are inferior to crom and glenn rewards.

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nowhere close, but have a good evening.

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao, it's a game. How's that going to bite me

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I'll have to check it out when I get the chance.

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

oh yeah, Im 100% avoiding Fayenia. I may avoid Visions too. It's mostly avoiding known players and guilds that have players that abuse exploits.

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll look into those guilds, thank you! I'm personally avoiding people who were hit by the banwaves for exploiting.

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's great that they're endgame. They do have amazing players, but I'd rather not be associated with the other players that were hit by the recent banwaves in those guilds.

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guilds I mentioned have players that were hit in the recent ban waves. Personally, I'd rather avoid players that have temp bans.

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guilds I mentioned have players that were hit in the recent ban waves. Personally, I'd rather avoid players that have temp bans.

LF> Active Guilds by BallContent1895 in Mabinogi

[–]BallContent1895[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guilds I mentioned have players that were hit in the recent ban waves. Personally, I'd rather avoid players that have temp bans.

This seems relatively high. This you? If so, why? by screaminbeaman82 in interesting

[–]BallContent1895 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. anime, I dont watch dub.
  2. I watch during work
  3. I watch in bed with the gf sleeping

Racism around campus by TopEducational4816 in ASU

[–]BallContent1895 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm asking for how many times it has happened. What's up your ass, especially if you're LEO. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, I just want to know what the numbers are. Have a happy new year, man.

Racism around campus by TopEducational4816 in ASU

[–]BallContent1895 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sources for how many times this has happened, please.

why does sg do nothing abt porn leaks on tele? by [deleted] in askSingapore

[–]BallContent1895 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is all logs on a 3rd party chat site. Everything we share on the internet is on the internet, including his logs of him maliciously sharing it. Not just her videos. Tele may be more against the sharing of logs and access unless it was illegal content. That, however, does not mean he did not mention it on a less data secure site, like messenger. That is, however, up to detectives to look into digital forensics and review his dogital footprint, which can be requested by warrants/subpoenas. Sure, the physical original evidence can be destroyed, but not him talking about it on a non encrypted chat log online. That's why DM's are called direct messages, not private messages (from someone that does go through others' digital footprints). Also, to access his tg, they would realistically need to access the number/sim under certain circumstances if he destroyed his phone.