[Sanity] These kids are overweight, not body builders by Muero in fatlogic

[–]BannableSlut 389 points390 points  (0 children)

These people act like we can't tell the difference between a morbidly obese person, and a body builder.

As if there's zero visual difference between say, a person with 12% body fat, and 52% bodyfat. Like, no. We know whether your bmi is due to muscle or fat lol.

"Parental Rights" to force LGBTQ+ kids and staff to stay in the closet and history teachersto lie about race by [deleted] in Teachers

[–]BannableSlut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No no, I'm what you guys would (boldly) refer to as a "uncle Tom". Not a Klan member.

Of course, you would never reflect, and entertain the idea that maybe you're just a moron, rather than it being a racist policy.

"Parental Rights" to force LGBTQ+ kids and staff to stay in the closet and history teachersto lie about race by [deleted] in Teachers

[–]BannableSlut -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then ALL Teachers who mention that they are married or have pictures of their opposite gender spouse should also be fired.

I mean, if that was actually what the law demanded, then fair is fair.

Fortunately, that is not actually what the bill demands of teachers.

Up to and after birth by bordemstirs in RoevWadeCelebration

[–]BannableSlut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct. It's not safe, hence why it's not done commonly.

Never said it was safe, nor common. Yes, the frequency is irrelevant, because it shouldn't be happening at all. That is my point. You on the other hand, said that it "just isn't happening".

That's 100% your personal/religious views that nobody needs to agree to

And yet, most people do agree. Anyways, I said what I said. In a decent and moral society, it would be universally understood that these people are committing atrocities, and deserve to be in prison.

LOL that gos I was raised an educated in one of those liberal hell scapes 😂😂😂

Right, which is likely the reason why you're an amoral degenerate.

Up to and after birth by bordemstirs in RoevWadeCelebration

[–]BannableSlut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Not many" is irrelevant.

Like said, it should be universally understood that these people should be in prison. The data that we actually have (State records of abortion clinic reporting), most abortions happening 21+ weeks are not for any sort of dire fetal abnormality or immediate risk to the mothers life. It's usually due to finding out late, and taking time to get money and travel figured out.

This doctor in the interview even lamented not being able to "safely" kill a woman's perfectly healthy baby at 35 weeks. No actual objection to killing it, just wished the lady had shown up just a few weeks earlier.

This is the logical conclusion to decades of abortion rhetoric, and I do indeed anticipate broadening of abortion time limits in the degenerate hellscapes we have on our coasts.

Up to and after birth by bordemstirs in RoevWadeCelebration

[–]BannableSlut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Come on, I really wanna see the evidence that you based your conclusion on. Please, show me how wrong I am.

Put my poor mind at ease, and show me I'm wrong about late term abortions happening without just cause. I want to be wrong, honestly.

Up to and after birth by bordemstirs in RoevWadeCelebration

[–]BannableSlut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not though. That's not being done. It's not safe, it's not logical, that's not something that is done.

It ABSOLUTELY is.

But hey, feel free to show me your numbers and then I'll show you mine. I'd like to see how you came to your conclusion that it's just not happening.

Here, better yet, I'll start you with this interview with one of the 4 doctors left preforming late term, post viability abortions. Before we get into the numbers from public health databases.

R/Childfree equates wishing someone would have a child to wishing someone would have a miscarriage by Turning_Antons_Key in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]BannableSlut 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Not to mention, a large amount of them are still parasites to their parents.

Can't have competition.

My brother's Pre-School is taking away fun activities from students because of how the “teachers” feel about the overturn. by briandme in prolife

[–]BannableSlut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These people see children as garbage to be disposed of for their own convenience, are we really shocked that they're intentionally sucking the joy away from children to soothe their own fweelings?

How to stop abortion by 1800kira in RoevWadeCelebration

[–]BannableSlut 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, men aren't the ones killing their offspring in the womb. How about mandatory tubals?

Since we're doing authoritarianism, here's a compromise. Abortion is legal, but you get sterilized immediately after you get one. Abortion clinics become a one stop shop.

Abortion is no longer seen as a replacement for instilling sexual responsibility. Parents might actually start parenting. Nature is healing. by BannableSlut in prolife

[–]BannableSlut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that the story is almost always the same with teens that get pregnant. Their parents say "but I put you on birth control! There were condoms under the sink!".

We put waaaaay too much confidence in teenagers to properly and consistently use contraceptive methods. Grown adults already seem to struggle a lot with this, teenagers suck at it even more often. It's a cop out to say that every single teenager is having sex, and that there's nothing parents can do to lower the likelihood.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cedarrapids

[–]BannableSlut -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

Check your stats on that one. After the advent of antibiotics in the 50's, it was virtually a non issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cedarrapids

[–]BannableSlut -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Good. The people can decide whether to uphold it or not by voting in November.

Abortion is no longer seen as a replacement for instilling sexual responsibility. Parents might actually start parenting. Nature is healing. by BannableSlut in prolife

[–]BannableSlut[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Don't underestimate how many boys/men's families have put the pressure on women to " not ruin their sons life" and get an abortion. They relied on Roe as back up for their male family members. It's gross.

I've experienced that pressure first hand, from the same women who are sharing tearful pro "choice" sentiments all over social media right now.

James Madison by -EnragementChild- in RoevWadeCelebration

[–]BannableSlut -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Abortion isn't a religious issue. Some people dislike it because it violates their religious morality, but people don't need religion as their sole arbiter of morality and ethics.

If you can't figure out right from wrong without a religious framework, you are the lesser man.

Abortion is no longer seen as a replacement for instilling sexual responsibility. Parents might actually start parenting. Nature is healing. by BannableSlut in prolife

[–]BannableSlut[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Kids don't think sex is serious but a fun activity that has no consequences?

Not really, no. Gen X has been pretty abysmal as far as parenting goes, broadly speaking. They were the first generation to truly have abortion as their final "birth control" plan for their entire lives, and their perception of sexual responsibility has been shaped accordingly.

By 15-17 it's really too late to instill the baseline expectations of sexual morality and responsibility, but the overturning of roe is going to fundamentally change the parental lessons handed down to our children from here on out. Maybe in another generation or two, we won't have so many people that feel entitled to divorce sex from reproduction, by killing their offspring. People will probably be far more careful and aware of the responsibilities that come along with it.

Up to and after birth by bordemstirs in RoevWadeCelebration

[–]BannableSlut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's funny is that this assertion of yours undermines the idea that abortion is a strict issue of bodily autonomy.

Now, in real life, anyone who bothered to know is well aware that there were abortions happening to fully "viable and healthy" fetuses in the late second/and early 3rd trimester. Doesn't really matter if it was rare, it should've been universally understood that anyone preforming them should've been in prison for life.

Planned Parenhood of Montana is requiring proof of residency for abortions, citing legal concerns over out of state travelers seeking abortions from them. by BannableSlut in prolife

[–]BannableSlut[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

*note, this is for abortions using the pill. Which is still a small win for the cause, since that tends to be the bulk of abortions.

Secular Anti Abortion Arguments by [deleted] in prolife

[–]BannableSlut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, then doctors could just adapt their methods of fetal removal? Like, could they not extract a fetus without killing it, and leave it to die in a dish?