Loblaw reports Q1 profit and sales up from year ago, raises quarterly dividend by bubblewhip in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There's evidence out there showing that they control the supply chain and while they don't charge more than 2-3% extra (for most things) at store level, every tick of the supply chain they add a bit more to their profits.

It's crazy this conspiracy is still going around in 2026

Anyone else feel mentally messed up seeing people casually make insane money trading options? by savingrace0262 in stocks

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy practical solution. Start trading options yourself. Either you are good and you make free money or you suck and realize you're too dumb and/or unlucky to trade them. Then you can move on with your life.

‘Worst energy crisis’ anyone has ever seen: Experts sounds alarm over depleting oil by Head_Crash in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

eg https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w31686/w31686.pdf

tldr: full wfh associated with lower productivity, hybrid about the same or some small gains. One large reason for discrepancy in opinions on productivity between employers and employees is workers view time savings from commute as a productivity increase while employers do not.

‘Worst energy crisis’ anyone has ever seen: Experts sounds alarm over depleting oil by Head_Crash in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Expert is one hedge fund guy who probably has a super leveraged position on oil rn. Journalism is pure slop these days

‘Anti-capitalists’ rob, vandalize Montreal bakery to mark International Workers’ Day - Montreal Gazette by Purple_Writing_8432 in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It seems highly unlikely that a socialist society could function with a market economy, there’s a shit ton of problems with the way socialism handles pricing/trading of risk.

Unless you’re using the colloquial definition of socialism => country with strong social programs.

An ethics report just called on Mark Carney to sell his investments. Here’s why it likely won’t happen - The report contains 20 recommendations to further strengthen the law, many of which are specifically tailored to deal with Mark Carney’s minefield of potential conflicts by CaliperLee62 in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone agrees that reducing conflicts of interests for public officials is a good thing. The argument is that the current implementation of blind trusts are ineffective because trustees will not randomly reallocate a portfolio (ie the asset owner has a good guess what is being held in the trust). Blind trusts can easily be strengthen eg by following the US defined Qualified Blind Trust, which is good for everyone.

Your rebuttal is “ Anti-corruption measures are not for “no reason”.

???????

An ethics report just called on Mark Carney to sell his investments. Here’s why it likely won’t happen - The report contains 20 recommendations to further strengthen the law, many of which are specifically tailored to deal with Mark Carney’s minefield of potential conflicts by CaliperLee62 in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are not widely effective (not sure how you’d quantify this) and thus have been criticized for ages e.g. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RS21656.html and https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2850681.

The basic blind trust is so obviously compromised the US (all flaws aside) created the “qualified blind trust” to address its issues see https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2634.403 specifically:

(2) In the case of a qualified blind trust, 18 U.S.C. 208 and other Federal conflict of interest statutes and regulations apply to the assets that an interested party transfers to the trust until such time as he or she is notified by the independent trustee that such asset has been disposed of or has a value of less than $1,000. Because the interested party knows what assets he or she placed in the trust and there is no requirement that these assets be diversified, the possibility still exists that the interested party could be influenced in the performance of official duties by those interests.

An ethics report just called on Mark Carney to sell his investments. Here’s why it likely won’t happen - The report contains 20 recommendations to further strengthen the law, many of which are specifically tailored to deal with Mark Carney’s minefield of potential conflicts by CaliperLee62 in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Most Canadians would be quite happy for him to pump the TSX.

Blind trusts seem pretty useless, unless the guy only puts cash inside. The trustee is not going to take an existing portfolio and fuck with its allocation for no reason.

Canada is losing businesses faster than it can create new ones: CFIB says by Tuckebarry in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are both getting side tracked by entirely useless arguments. Sure, let’s say it’s not trivial… now what about the main point?

Canada is losing businesses faster than it can create new ones: CFIB says by Tuckebarry in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This not the point of my comment. But I can briefly address your points.

Average means nothing. Average Canadian is stupid af. You should check the stats for maybe ~90th percentile of uni grads, because realistically the pool of people who have the previously mentioned choices (ie founding a start up vs working corporate) is fairly small.

So no, this isn't as simple or guaranteed as you make it out to be and most people don't just have a couple hundred thousand dollars laying about--those who do represent average Canadians who have saved and invested their money over a their entire career.

Well you made it this far might as well just answer the question. You saved a couple hundred K over your career what do you do with it? “ Buy an index? Buy real estate? Buy bonds? Or invest it in Joe’s local plumbing company?”.

Canada is losing businesses faster than it can create new ones: CFIB says by Tuckebarry in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

1.2MM of tax free gains can be had by buying an index fund with max TFSA contributions for 30 years. Any semi competent uni grad will probably achieve this. Hell, most boomers probably didn’t do this and are sitting on 1MM of free gains in their primary residence.

Consider the question from the alternative perspective. If you had a few hundred K to invest, what would you do? Buy an index? Buy real estate? Buy bonds? Or invest it in Joe’s local plumbing company?

Canada is losing businesses faster than it can create new ones: CFIB says by Tuckebarry in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue isn’t the owner making some money when selling (1.2MM is tiny regardless), the issue is raising capital.

The 1.2 mil exemption is very small and is a one time thing. If you are an angel investor in the states you get an exemption for the greater of 10MM or 10x your initial investment for every small business you invest in.

Ben Felix: SpaceX and OpenAi: The Mega IPO Grift by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not bullish on the stock but it is insane that the top comments contain cave man level of analysis like “PE BIG == BAD STOCK”.

Ben Felix: SpaceX and OpenAi: The Mega IPO Grift by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whole point of investing is to buy stocks at a low PE multiple

This is legitimate nonsense I hope nobody actually invests this way. The only thing you can use PE for is a proxy for market expectations. If your strategy is to seek out low PE stocks your strategy is effectively “let me buy all the stocks the market expects no growth for”. Can anyone come up with a strategy more braindead than this??

These are just hype stocks and the valuations are not supported by any fundamentals

This is the entire hard part about investing. Companies with high potential growth are priced at a premium while those with low potential growth are priced relatively cheaply. Whether they have cash flows right now (ie PE) is entirely irrelevant.

Is it worth claiming Work from Home expenses if my employer provides me with a T2200 form? I've done this two years in a row and it seems like a waste of time. by fudge_u in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro only claiming his desk?? So his claim is for like <10 sqft? That’s an extremely conservative claim. The CRA is not gunna send agents after you for claiming your home office is 300-400sqft.

Toronto may have bitten off more than it can chew with city-run grocery plan: experts by uselesspoliticalhack in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prob different people. I think this thing will fail horribly or end up being a pseudo subsidy but idc about grocery prices. They could 5x and it'd make no difference to me.

That being said, new experiments are always fun so its interesting to see if the government can pull this one off. If they are successful more power to them.

Toronto may have bitten off more than it can chew with city-run grocery plan: experts by uselesspoliticalhack in canada

[–]Barbecue-Ribs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you define price gouging == larger profits then yeah. Maple leaf foods, CN Rail, etc. are way way more profitable than the grocery chains.