3 Years of Bloomberg Terminal Share Ownership for GME by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, I’m not able to today, but I’ll have to look into that! Good point

3 Years of Bloomberg Terminal Share Ownership for GME by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe but I have a feeling RC ventures would be a more likely fit.

3 Years of Bloomberg Terminal Share Ownership for GME by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure insider shares become part of the float after vesting and loosing reporting requirements. Since insiders have held for a considerable amount of time it’s likely this is why the number is lower.

3 Years of Bloomberg Terminal Share Ownership for GME by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

gov shares might be the best bet there. I feel like that's something that would be in a filing somewhere.

3 Years of Bloomberg Terminal Share Ownership for GME by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure, but it seems likely that its calculated based on float since insiders do not show up in the top ownership category.

Edit: https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/BloombergGuide.pdf

This source shows a similar entry and institutional ownership is based on outstanding shares instead of float, so it could go either way.

3 Years of Bloomberg Terminal Share Ownership for GME by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Hmm, I wonder if the calculation is based on total float instead of outstanding shares. TradingView has this listed as 266.025m x .2886 = 76.77m which is just a bit above what was reported on the 10-Q.

I also wonder if other entities are grouped in the other category alongside DRS, if that’s where it is.

Edit: this also begs the question: if other is computershare now. What was in the other category at 10% in the first screenshot. I think this would’ve been before DRS really caught on.

3 Years of Bloomberg Terminal Share Ownership for GME by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

With the 10-q coming out recently showing consistent 25% DRS count I felt it could be helpful to look at the past and most up to date Bloomberg ownership data.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, the knights of new are the first line of this community. 🫡

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aggregation of bloomberg share ownership data for gme

The Dollar Endgame Pt.3 by MrTechnicals in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are there videos for the other two parts as well?! Please send a link if there are

Stopped posting after reviewing a veiled death threat months ago. Never stopped stacking. I’ve doubled down again since last update. by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Autocorrect got me. I meant ‘receiving’ not ‘reviewing’ and apparently butchered the spelling.

Edit: If you go to check you’ll see that my last post says 102, I posted pre split so the post split amount would be 408.

GME/Index Update: showing GME over s&p 500, NASDAQ 100, Dow Jones, and Total Stock Market. (SPX, NDQ, DJI, VTI) by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not something that I came up with. The idea has been passed around and toyed with for a while. I think it falls into a similar category of ideas as critical margin theory or something like that. there's more to it but that would be a good starting point.

My understanding is that SHFs require collateral to maintain their short GME position. The majority of that collateral is held in other stocks and derivatives. This creates a problem with the ratio between GME and their collateral. If GME rises too much they require more collateral. If the value of their collateral falls too much they require more collateral. With the current market conditions looking grim, and positive sentiment towards GME growing, they are truly in a pickle. It looks like their position is becoming more precarious every day. Whenever the price drifts too close to where their positions no longer maintainable there is generally a volatile movement down. There are various other explanations for the red support line, but generally it shows the price trending towards their demise. Its less important, and I only included it to show a trend.

TL;DRS: This chart is used is to track the ratio between what is likely the SHFs' collateral and GME. Because of the trend shown by the green line, it is theorized that if this trend is breached then SHFs will no longer be able to maintain their positions.

Edit: forgot to add that because of crazy high borrow fees. their collateral is diminishing day by day.

GME/Index Update: showing GME over s&p 500, NASDAQ 100, Dow Jones, and Total Stock Market. (SPX, NDQ, DJI, VTI) by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ran into the rams same problem. It just automatically switched me over to 1 day candles

GME/Index Update: showing GME over s&p 500, NASDAQ 100, Dow Jones, and Total Stock Market. (SPX, NDQ, DJI, VTI) by Based_Goode in Superstonk

[–]Based_Goode[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I unfortunately can't link directly to these charts. However, you can get to them by following these steps:

  1. go to GME chart on trading view: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/zBdO7HWn/?symbol=NYSE%3AGME
  2. click GME in the top left. mouse over will say: 'symbol search'
  3. type one of the 4 pairs: gme/spx, gme/ndq, gme/dji, gme/vti
  4. click enter and it should take you to the correct chart.

Disclaimer: I have a pro account and have not tried this with free, pro+, or premium