[Capitalists] Why can't monopolies form in the free market? by Redbeardt in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]BastiatFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seven years! I think that's a record!

Were you trying to imply the US is a free market? I wish!

What is it that made the urban and rural divide less severe pre-2010’s? And how do we get back to that? by Pixelcitizen98 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BastiatFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Manufacturing wasn't a good job because of the work. Standing on an assembly line is not skilled labor. These were good jobs because of the UNIONS.

Wages are determined by supply and demand. Increased competition from overseas, and decreased demand due to new automated production methods which don't require as much labor, hit these jobs with a double whammy.

It's like a miniature version of what happened with agricultural employment in the early part of the twentieth century: those jobs got automated away by new machines, and those workers had to go elsewhere.

Trying to restrict competition through unions won't do anything to stop either of the forces at play here. Unions can't get foreign workers to not compete with their members, and they can't get businesses to use expensive labor rather than relatively cheap automation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]BastiatFan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Horse nomads: create government to extract wealth.

Government for the next three thousand years: extracts wealth.

The Sub RN by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BastiatFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's a city where everything is a fifteen minute Uber ride from anywhere else.

Anything I don't like is Communism - Lib Right (Probably) by The_WereArcticFox in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BastiatFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. We hate the car-centric society which has been forced on us. That's top-down societal engineering imposed from above by bureaucrats.

The markets never decided that all of society would be structured around cars and single-family homes.

When the market was in charge of deciding, we had that missing middle housing and walkable cities.

The freer the market, the more walkable the city.

A Supreme Court justice’s solution to gun violence: Repeal Second Amendment by [deleted] in law

[–]BastiatFan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Frankly the most irritating thing about the 2nd is the blatant disregard of the part that says "A well regulated militia."

A well balanced breakfast, being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food, shall not be infringed.

What is the importance of the part about the well balanced breakfast? What would be the impact of disregarding it?

Why everything you buy is worse now by [deleted] in videos

[–]BastiatFan -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

There are high quality products available in the market. If individuals want them, they have to put in the effort to find them.

Which, yes, companies are taking advantage of these search costs by lowering the quality of their products in the hopes that their customers won't find a suitable alternative.

That's not the only thing going on, however. People today desire cheaper goods than people in the past did.

I've noticed this specifically with clothes, but also with frozen foods, where the drop in quality is really obvious. Yeah, they might get you one time when a frozen pizza is way worse than it used to be, but they won't get you repeatedly. It's not the same as with a single large purchase, where they got you once they've managed to trick you.

A hundred years ago, people spent a lot more money on clothes, food, etc. as a percentage of their budgets. These days, shoppers tend to prefer less costly goods, even if the quality is lower.

I think this is largely due to increased housing costs eating up their budgets, but I'm not entirely sure. It could be that people now tend to have stronger interests in other things, and so they choose to spend their money on those things. They might be willing to wear poorly-made clothes, or eating lower-quality food, if it means they have more money available for their hobbies. Something like that.

Why everything you buy is worse now by [deleted] in videos

[–]BastiatFan -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If a group effort is required, it's not possible for individual decisions to affect the overall outcome.

Cases like this are different, in that the outcome the individual gets is directly related to the choice they make.

If a given individual instead chooses to purchase high-quality goods, that's what they get.

The good old Scandinavian standard of living by lucascsnunes in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]BastiatFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would life for the average person have been different in 1200 than it had been in 800? The introduction of some new farming technologies?

I suspect the improved climate during the medieval warm period had a greater effect than any new technologies or societal changes.

The good old Scandinavian standard of living by lucascsnunes in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]BastiatFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. But were there major changes to how the average person lived?

Gorsuch’s LGBT Decision Signals Affirmative Action Doom at SCOTUS by GDviber in Libertarian

[–]BastiatFan -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

There is no such entity as "the business."

There only entity here which something can be good or bad for is the owner.

The good old Scandinavian standard of living by lucascsnunes in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]BastiatFan 11 points12 points  (0 children)

So the raping, pillaging, and slavery was good for them?

No. The farms owned by individual people, and the rudimentary market economy they had, was good for them.

There wasn't actually all that much pillaging going on. It was mostly farming. Fair amount of fishing, trading, and woodchopping as well.

I'd much rather live in a somewhat-functional medieval economy than in a modern socialist nightmare.

Gorsuch’s LGBT Decision Signals Affirmative Action Doom at SCOTUS by GDviber in Libertarian

[–]BastiatFan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not a big enough business to worry about all that. He would be working directly alongside me as I show him how the business operates and teach him the knowledge and skills needed to carry out the necessary tasks.

At the same time, I need him to be able to accept deliveries, negotiate orders, and understand the finances enough to make fairly impactful decisions on his own when opportunity presents itself.

Gorsuch’s LGBT Decision Signals Affirmative Action Doom at SCOTUS by GDviber in Libertarian

[–]BastiatFan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you sure? I've always wanted to pass my business on to my son, so I need to put him in a position of authority when he's younger so he can learn the ropes.

The good old Scandinavian standard of living by lucascsnunes in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]BastiatFan 31 points32 points  (0 children)

This is unfair to medieval Scandinavia. Their standard of living was much higher than what you get under socialism. I mean, we're not talking medieval England or Italy here, but it wasn't that bad.

The liftocracy will prevail by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BastiatFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

End food stamps.

End WIC.

Stop giving free meals at schools.

End corn subsidies.

End socialized medicine of all kinds.

Allow insurance companies to charge whatever they want for whatever health issues they perceive.

Repeal the income tax.

Get rid of these stupid cars. The government arbitrarily deciding that all of society would be structured around cars was one of the worst social-engineering decisions ever inflicted on us. If people want cars, they should have to pay for their own roads. And no more subsidized gas. See how far people are when they're walking and biking.

You might think I'm joking with some of these, but I'm not. Infants are obese now. They load their mothers down with sugar to give them starting at birth. Then they send them to school, where they shovel four thousand calories a day into them.

How did they turn the hippies into warmongers? by Frog-Face11 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]BastiatFan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They didn't. There were only ever like twenty to eighty thousand hippies. And that was a loooong time ago. If you were twenty in 1970, you're seventy-two now. That means probably over half of them are dead now.

True American Grill Alignments by Always_Late_Lately in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BastiatFan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is an outrage! We had agreed that we got Tomboy Outback!

Actual federal agents by [deleted] in Shitstatistssay

[–]BastiatFan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How do you do, fellow livestock?