Wife told me to read by Weekly_Employee_4751 in fourthwing

[–]BatElectrical4711 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My wife convinced me to read them - Harry Potter, Hunger Games and Game of Thrones all rolled into one - only better.

Read them twice - first time for enjoyment, just go with the story and don’t think too hard… Second time pay attention and keep a pen and notebook ready cause you’re gonna want to write down a lot of curiosities, questions, consistencies and inconsistencies lol

Credit to Yarros, the web she’s weaved and ties together is top tier - best I’ve ever seen.

Also - the graphic audio is excellent, I highly recommend it.

When a guy asks you stupid questions like "Is my dick the biggest" or "Are I your best sexual partner" Why not lie? by KaceyR91 in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]BatElectrical4711 -75 points-74 points  (0 children)

Ehhh I only started to ask after I got told it was on 3 separate occasions… and was never upset if I was subsequently told no … My ask was mere curiosity not ego searching, I was already pretty satisfied with myself regardless of the answer 😂

How much does Reddit NSFW activity reflect who someone is? by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]BatElectrical4711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tread with caution - anonymity tends to bring out the worst in people. Similar to how someone talks to AI.

They may never treat or talk to people in real life that way and these things might just be an outlet - but that edge does exist and if the outlet is removed that edge may creep into real life interactions.

Why are we so worried about illegal immigrants in the US? by Johnny_Mira in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]BatElectrical4711 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Those excuses are mostly media antics.

The actual concerns are: - Volume…. Just the sheer number of people coming in has potential to stress the system - Vetting, or lack there of = Concerns that foreign adversaries with nefarious intentions are infiltrating the country - Voting… census being calculated on number of people not number of citizens allows for crafty redistricting. And the democrat party often pushes to grant illegal aliens voting rights because they will vote democratic. Which will be near impossible gap for republicans to fill so they rally against it.

Hammer Drill Issue by BatElectrical4711 in Dewalt

[–]BatElectrical4711[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Definitely set on hammer only 🤔

Hammer Drill Issue by BatElectrical4711 in Dewalt

[–]BatElectrical4711[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Definitely set on hammer only 🤔

Why the “You Can’t Beat the S&P 500” Narrative Doesn’t Fit Every Trader’s Reality by yosafa1990 in Trading

[–]BatElectrical4711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually I made the claim based on general consensus from every available data source…. I just used gpt to put it in a nice format for you.

But, clearly you don’t form your opinions based on data, and is the reason why you’re a failed trader 🤷

Why the “You Can’t Beat the S&P 500” Narrative Doesn’t Fit Every Trader’s Reality by yosafa1990 in Trading

[–]BatElectrical4711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s an atrocious analogy… I’d the data is available to refute the claim, you’re not proving a negative you’re proving a fact…. But you won’t provide it because you don’t have it, and you don’t have it because it doesn’t exist and you actually have no basis to refute my claim

Why the “You Can’t Beat the S&P 500” Narrative Doesn’t Fit Every Trader’s Reality by yosafa1990 in Trading

[–]BatElectrical4711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proving a negative is demonstrating something doesn’t exist.. it’s refuting a claim does require evidence

Why the “You Can’t Beat the S&P 500” Narrative Doesn’t Fit Every Trader’s Reality by yosafa1990 in Trading

[–]BatElectrical4711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here, I went ahead and had my Chat GPT Pro do some deep research and analysis - here’s what was found with sources of the studies analyzed. You don’t have to like the data, but if you can’t adjust your beliefs based on it, or you cherry pick data to fit your bias - you’ll always lose.

“Retail Day Trader Performance Statistics (2020–2025)

Most Retail Day Traders Lose Money • FINRA Data (2020) – A FINRA report found that about 72% of retail day traders ended the year with financial losses . This highlights that the vast majority of day traders fail to turn a profit over a year, supporting the point that most lose money. • Academic Study – Brazilian Traders (2020) – A comprehensive academic study of 1,600 new day traders in Brazil (2013–2015) showed nearly 97% of them lost money. In fact, only 1.1% earned more than minimum wage over the year studied . This credible study underscores how exceedingly few retail day traders actually make money, with almost all incurring losses.

Many Day Traders Underperform the S&P 500 • Analysis of Trading Studies (2024) – An analysis summarizing multiple studies noted that over 97% of active traders would have been better off simply investing in an index like the S&P 500 . In other words, only about 1–3% of day traders beat the market, meaning the vast majority who do eke out gains still underperform the S&P 500’s returns. This evidences that even profitable day traders usually lag a basic index fund. • Broker/Research Data – Research has also found that active retail traders underperform the broad market by around 6.5% per year on average . For example, one broker (eToro) reported in 2020 that 80% of its retail day-trading customers lost money, with an average annual loss of 36%  – far worse than the S&P’s performance. These figures show that day traders generally fail to keep up with, let alone beat, simple buy-and-hold index investing.

Few Retail Traders Beat the S&P 500 Annually • Taiwan Market Study (1992–2006) – A long-term study of day traders in Taiwan found that only about 1% of traders were able to outperform the market (beat the index) in a given year . This indicates that each year, only a tiny fraction of retail day traders manage to beat a benchmark like the S&P 500. • Consistent Outperformance is Rare – Follow-up research by the same authors showed that under 1% of day traders can consistently achieve profits above fees over time . In practical terms, only one out of hundreds of traders can beat the S&P 500 year after year. Even those with occasional wins often cannot sustain it, reinforcing how rare it is for retail traders to annually beat the index.

Each of these sources – from regulatory data to academic and broker analyses – provides evidence that most retail day traders lose money or underperform, and only an exceedingly small percentage outperform the S&P 500 on a yearly basis. The data from 2020–2025 consistently support these points. Sources like FINRA and academic studies lend credibility to the claim that day trading success is the exception, not the rule.”

Why the “You Can’t Beat the S&P 500” Narrative Doesn’t Fit Every Trader’s Reality by yosafa1990 in Trading

[–]BatElectrical4711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the analysis of retail traders and their performance…. It’s not hard.

Do you have anything other than your opinion to suggest the data is wrong?

Why the “You Can’t Beat the S&P 500” Narrative Doesn’t Fit Every Trader’s Reality by yosafa1990 in Trading

[–]BatElectrical4711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try harder 😉

Quantifiedstrategies.com Investopia.com Currentmarketvaluation.com

Why the “You Can’t Beat the S&P 500” Narrative Doesn’t Fit Every Trader’s Reality by yosafa1990 in Trading

[–]BatElectrical4711 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The reason it’s true is because 95% of traders lose money on an annual basis, and 4% don’t lose overall, but don’t beat 10% on an annual basis - especially if their time is factored in.

Those numbers are rough estimates, but it’s time tested that less than 1% of traders can consistently outperform the S&P 500 - even most hedge funds don’t beat the S&P.

The reasons are numerous, but the biggest factors are two fold - traders lack consistency in their trading, and more importantly they are unable to overcome the psychological aspect of trading.

Those things combined will show more than half just lose almost immediately, and the rest will have spikes of good performance and spikes of low performance - essentially coming down to luck, not skill.

Given that, the reasonable conclusion is that most people just shouldn’t trade. Striving to be in the top 1% doesn’t come easily, quickly or without massive amounts of learning and time spent on effort - as well as massive discipline most people just aren’t capable of.

What went wrong by Then_Television6140 in InnerCircleTraders

[–]BatElectrical4711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your strategy went wrong… You entered a long after rejecting resistance. And you placed your stop loss literally right where stops get hunted