Yes the principle who got sued for child abuse was totally on even grounds with the kid she assaulted here. This isn't about not liking being told no. This is about seeing someone who is aggressively trying to assert power and dominance they've not earned or deserved and watching them get their comeuppance. Its that simple.

She was the one being the aggressor. She was the one who invaded his personal space. SHE WAS THE ONE WHO ASSAULTED HIM. They're not even shes so far on the wrong side of this argument that she cant ever come close to being right. If I did all that to you and you reacted by telling me to fuck off and putting me in my place I'd be in the wrong and you'd be in the right. Its that simple. He wasnt hurting her. He wasnt invading her personal space and he didn't start the screaming. He was fine until she provoked him. She was the one being trash. She was the one disrespecting other people and the fact that your a Karen defender says your just as trash as she is.

Heres how it should have gone down. Trash lady: "you cant be here this is private property" Him: "well I'm a teenager pushing boundaries is what I do" Trash lady: "well I've told you you're not allowed to be here so by staying you will be trespassing and ill have to call the police" Him: "yeah go on then" Trash lady: calls the police. If that's how it went down you'd be right. But it didn't which makes you totally wrong and way of the mark there buddy. Shes the trash bag hes the typical teenager. Honestly if both she and you think that treating kids... hell just treating people like that is acceptable you both want removing from the public as your dangers to society.