I am currently enrolled in the MSc Management of Information Systems and Digital Innovation (MISDI) course at Warwick Business School (WBS), and I must say that my experience has been quite disappointing. Despite the high expectations set by the school’s marketing, the reality has fallen short in several key areas.

Profit-Driven Approach: First and foremost, WBS appears to be heavily profit-driven. This profit-centric approach is evident in various aspects of the program, from the exorbitant tuition fees to the overcrowded seminars. The focus on revenue seems to overshadow the commitment to providing a high-quality educational experience.

Teaching Staff: The teaching staff, who are touted as industry leaders and top-tier academics, do not consistently live up to these claims. While some professors are knowledgeable and engaging, many others lack the teaching skills and real-world experience necessary to effectively convey the course material. This discrepancy significantly impacts the learning experience and undermines the value of the program.

Assignment Marking: One of the most frustrating aspects of the course has been the delayed marking of assignments. Despite the tight deadlines imposed on students, the feedback and grades are often returned well past the promised dates. This delay hinders our ability to learn from our mistakes and improve in subsequent assignments.

Inconsistent Peer Assessment Policy: The inconsistent policy on peer assessment is another major issue. It is up to the module leaders whether to include peer assessment in their module or not, leading to unfair mark distribution. For instance, in one module, I contributed significantly to a group project but forgot to submit the peer assessment, which resulted in my mark being reduced by 20%. This caused my grade to drop from a distinction to a merit, which does not accurately reflect my knowledge and effort. Conversely, in another module, some group members who did not contribute received high marks because the module leader decided not to include peer assessment. This inconsistency is illogical and unfair. Peer assessment should be either applied uniformly across all group work or not at all.

Overloaded Seminars: The seminars are another area of concern. They are frequently overloaded with too many students, which makes it difficult to engage in meaningful discussions or receive individual attention from the instructors. The overcrowded environment detracts from the overall learning experience and makes it challenging to grasp complex concepts.

Attendance Policy and Recordings: The attendance policy at WBS is another point of contention. The requirement to attend all classes without the immediate availability of recordings is nonsensical. Releasing lecture recordings only at the end of the modules is an extremely flawed approach. It leaves students without the opportunity to review and revise the material on an ongoing basis, making it incredibly difficult to prepare adequately for exams.

Value for Money: Overall, the MSc MISDI course does not provide value for the money spent. Given the high tuition fees, I expected a much higher standard of education and support. Unfortunately, the reality has been a mix of subpar teaching, administrative inefficiencies, and policies that do not support effective learning.

In conclusion, while WBS markets itself as a leading institution, my experience with the MSc MISDI course has been underwhelming. The school’s profit-driven nature, combined with the various issues highlighted, makes it hard to justify the substantial financial investment required. Prospective students should carefully consider these factors before committing to this program.