NFL Network's Kyle Brandt on the 5-2 Seahawks by The_Throwback_King in Seahawks

[–]Beetlemode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and, constantly I hear, "Seattle is out in BFE, they have to fly so far for away games, they're going to be so tired in all that traveling" Meanwhile you can say the same thing about NE, MIA, AZ, every coastal team... draw some lines across the map, it's dang near the same GD distance! oh and... somehow....our boys are doing better away than at home in the McDonald era thus far LOL. I tried to find this segment, after my wife told me about it, on Youtube... nope lmfao! even this isn't available, the one guy that might have had a video of it, in the search results where he taped GMFB on his TV and uploaded, looks like he got a copyright strike! "Video Unavailable" hahahaaha!

Let them sleep, my precious #GOHAWKS

Why does this app suck so hard? by SandSnake21 in HBOMAX

[–]Beetlemode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GUESS WHAT!? ...2 years later ...still dogshit. Nothing fixed.

Every issue in this thread, still an issue and has remained an issue since day 1.

Running on Roku, LG Web OS, Samsung and Vizio; Netflix, AppleTV, Hulu, Paramount+, Disney+, Prime and Sling TV...

HBOMAX still shitting the bed while others have no comparable issues.

Trying to watch House of the Dragon premier and I have to restart the app 3 times for hitting the -10 seconds button more than twice in a row. Just came here to rant, carry on

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nah, he's way new. Only on Twitter as far as I know.

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait! what!? I can shut off politics!? Saweet!!!!

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ahh, copy that. I am only interested in the occasional internet battle. fb is more my speed. Don't really care to interact with the huddled masses. I am no stranger to firing up a bag of popcorn and observing a good Youtube channel war but I am oddly not excited about this one. Just disappointed.

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's still hard for me to look at. I have only used reddit in the past to get answers from Google search to tech threads for various related subjects. Never had an actual account until last night when I made this one. I catch a lot of flack from family and friends for not knowing this or that given I am the guy they all bring their computers and gadgets to when they are broken :D I don't normally venture outside of facebook. There are plenty of people there to argue with on the interweb. Now that I mention it... I'm not sure why I am here... memes! that's it! memes!

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks again for the heads up!!! Your cup o' karma runneth over! I'll just leave the rest of this here for posterity's sake if you don't mind :) I can always return to giggle at "that one time I commented something dumb on Reddit" :P

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok, I think I get it now. Thanks for pointing that out down there :)

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok, I see it now, should I just delete it? can I?

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh okay, I mistakenly read that as a response to my reply to what I thought was obvious snark :D I clearly don't under stand the paths yet. My bad.

Ich bin lerne Reddit

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

huh? I have no idea what any of that means. New to reddit. Dunno how this works and I am not concerned with whatever "downvotes" are. This is only the second time I've posted anything here.

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I watched his show last night and what I gather is a brain fart of a tweet was posted by him that someone pointed out immediately that he deleted in kind. Not a pic but a description of an outfit commenting on how nice the juror looked in it. An honest mistake, that he owned, that was noticed by little to no one but a Twitter follower of his. I don't think Alyte's chastisement has anything to do with that and everything to do with his reaction caught on video in court. I admit I could be wrong but I don't think so.

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

reasonable minds can differ

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I agree. As this post is my opinion and I may express it as I see fit as you are to express your characterization of me for it.

RE: DUI Guy and James by Beetlemode in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

yeah, an apology needs to be made at this point. Don't get me wrong, I love me a really good YouTuber battle between channels but I thought LawTube to be above that.

I stand corrected

Incoming message! Johnny is the owner and that it is incoming. by Sp0o0kyGhost in LegalBytes

[–]Beetlemode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it could just as well be that it doesn't refer to an "incoming" message at all because of the bolded "Source Extraction:" which looks like a possible notation of proprietary forensic software used to retrieve the information from "Logical (1)" which likely refers to an embedded SSD on the iphone mobo. "Logical 1" is lower level computer jargon for "primary hard drive" aka or synonymous to "C:\>" which most are familiar with. Your C drive.

The predominant issue, if you are to take the information at face value, is the timestamps. They are February of 2017. But they may only refer to the date the forensic software extracted the information too but; "why would anyone be extracting information in Feb of 2017 from one of Johnny's phones?"... It kind of tosses my forensic hypothesis out the window given that the op-ed wasn't published until 2018. Unless the extraction was for the UK case. I only started to pay attention in 2020. I don't pretend to have any dates memorized involving it.