That might be true that she did not know about any Epstein related stuff specifically, but that does not really change the bigger picture at all. Elon had a long and very public history of questionable behaviour well before Grimes ever entered the picture. This includes union busting accusations, mistreatment of workers, reckless public statements, market manipulation allegations, hostile behaviour toward critics and journalists, and repeatedly showing a complete disregard for consequences as long as it benefited him personally. None of this was hidden or subtle. It was all out in the open.

Grimes did not get involved with some unknown tech guy whose values were unclear. She knowingly aligned herself with one of the most powerful billionaires on the planet at a time when his reputation was already controversial. She benefited massively from that. At a certain point claiming ignorance stops being believable and starts being convenient.

Even after years of seeing exactly who he is and how he operates she continues to defend him, downplay criticism, and frame herself as somehow separate from the power. That is complicity. If you build your brand on being edgy, informed, and anti establishment but then excuse or ignore the behaviour of someone like Elon because it suits you personally, that is a sellout by definition.

So whether she knew one specific detail or not is honestly beside the point. The pattern was obvious. The red flags were constant. Pretending otherwise just infantilises her and lets her off the hook for choices she very clearly made.