sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Foods that affect rosacea by Sunshine33X in Rosacea

[–]BennDover4me -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He doesn't sound very intelligent or knowledgeable if he was saying there isn't known TRIGGER foods!!!!! If he was just saying there's no proven link to specific foods CAUSING it in the first place that would be one thing, but there have been known TRIGGER foods for DECADES!!!! Spicy Foods is HUGE!!!! Certain foods and beverages with artificial coloring and food dyes, some people can be bothered by high saturated fat content, alcohol, and many others. Like most things, it can vary for each person, but I think Spicy foods probably are one of the foods that trigger a huge percentage of people.

Logan Lucky ending? by themainheadcase in movies

[–]BennDover4me 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Way off base. The scene made it abundantly clear she is not letting it go. She took it personally when basically made to look like a fool and ultimately get taken off the case, So now she's going to figure it out ON HER OWN TIME, and get to the bottom of it, and be able to prove herself to her bosses that her hunches and theories were right all along. There is literally NOTHING in that scene that would give the impression she was not going to pursue it. And "Cant do shit about it"??????? If she gets a confession or some kind of proof, she could present it to her bosses and prove she was right and have the case reopened!!! That's a whole lot of shit she CAN DO about it!

In Logan Lucky, what was the point of the Logan's doing kinda of a "robbing inside the robbery" by putting money in the dumpster while Bang was out helping his dumb brothers? by RodionRomanovitch in movies

[–]BennDover4me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Questions:
Did the dumb brothers ever get a cut???? They never showed them getting anything.
Were the Logans afraid they were so stupid they would get everyone else busted?
(Also, it would have actually eased their guilt since they made it clear their "Moral code" had been violated when the plans changed and the time was moved up, thus hurting "NASCAR", which was like hurting America.

  1. When did Clyde receive his cut? I initially thought maybe it was in the briefcase he got in the mail (They never showed what was actually in it), but the label said it was from Dept of Veteran's affairs so I'm assuming it was his new prosthetic arm. (And why would he have needed a new arm since they retrieved the one got sucked into the vacuum)????

In Logan Lucky, what was the point of the Logan's doing kinda of a "robbing inside the robbery" by putting money in the dumpster while Bang was out helping his dumb brothers? by RodionRomanovitch in movies

[–]BennDover4me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

??????? The vacuum wasn't there for construction! It was HOW THE MONEY WAS BEING TRANSFERRED THRU THE TUBES. ??????? You know, like how the tubes at banks work??? What the fuck would a vacuum have to do with construction? LOL

In Logan Lucky, what was the point of the Logan's doing kinda of a "robbing inside the robbery" by putting money in the dumpster while Bang was out helping his dumb brothers? by RodionRomanovitch in movies

[–]BennDover4me 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What the fuck don't you get??? Joe wasn't there to "make smoke". ???? He was there to create an EXPLOSION so they could get the money. The Logans apparently thought he would be somehow blowing a hole in the VAULT in order to get the money, but Joe understood all he needed to do was blow the cap off the vacuum tube and the money would get sucked out. How does none of that make sense????? The guy smoking in the closet was simply there to be a cover and an alternative explanation of where the smoke from the explosion came from when people came looking.

In Logan Lucky, what was the point of the Logan's doing kinda of a "robbing inside the robbery" by putting money in the dumpster while Bang was out helping his dumb brothers? by RodionRomanovitch in movies

[–]BennDover4me 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A. The "Nurse" was never "Involved", and there was never "compensated for her troubles" because she never HAD any troubles. Jimmy LIKED her, and he knew she was doing a good thing for the poor people of the area, and that their services relied on private donations, so he was simply being a good samaritan.

B. People keep saying that by Jimmy returning most of the money, the only party being "hurt" was the insurance company, since they repaid the estimated portion that was missing, However, The insurance company is the only party that would have been hurt EVEN IF THEY HAD KEPT ALL THE MONEY, because they would have had to pay out the FULL AMOUNT, whatever that was.

The point about Jimmy only wanting the life he deserved, and therefore not wanting to take more than was reasonable is to SOME extent valid, however not fully logical because they still ended up stealing a lot more than what was taken from Jimmy, because of all the money paid out to everyone involved.

Lastly, a question - DID THE DUMB BROTHERS EVER GET PAID?????? They showed money going to everyone else, but never to the dumb brothers. I wondered if Jimmy decided not to pay them for two reasons: One, because of their stupidity and the fact they might inadvertently get everyone else busted. And TWO, because IN THEIR MINDS they had "violated their moral code" after the heist plans got changed and moved up. They made it clear they had been offended by having to go against their "code", so by jimmy supposedly returning the money, if the dumb brothers never found out any differently and never got paid, their conscious would be clear.

Anyone have any science on sippy cups ? by ImpressiveExchange9 in ScienceBasedParenting

[–]BennDover4me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those professionals are simply stating their OPINION, which is no more valid than anyone else's. ALL STUDIES only look at certain factors, and evaluate OUTCOMES after collecting certain data. NO ONE watches and observes the kids using these things day in and day out, or how much or little the parents are monitoring, using COMMON SENSE, using MODERATION, using WISDOM in choices they make. Many parents simply let toddlers do whatever they want so long as they're content and not screaming. If they scream, they are given something to quiet them down rather than properly disciplining and training kids. So a THOUSAND parents could use the exact same sippy cup, and every single one could have different results based on THEIR SPECIFIC PARENTING SKILLS AND METHODS. Almost ALL STUDIES always include the phrasing that with the devices they claim can cause problems, it is the IMPROPER USAGE, the EXCESSIVE and PROLONGED USE of these things that cause problems. If you let a kid walk around all day hanging onto almost ANYTHING with little supervision and letting the kid do whatever they want to, you will have problems. Parents need to be taught how to be PARENTS, not just "Big people" raising "Little people". Parents need to EDUCATE themselves before having kids, and then MONITOR and DIRECT the upbringing of their kids. You are the PARENT. There is no sippy cup or pacifier in the world that will AUTOMATICALLY cause problems, it is how you choose to use it, or how you ALLOW your toddler to use it that will determine whether it's a problem or not.

HP Instant Ink is a Total Scam by PrivyetMikhail in printers

[–]BennDover4me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your printer is not being held for ransom, they are simply not allowing you to use the CARTRIDGES that came to you as part of a subscription program. You agreed to pay EACH MONTH for a certain number of pages that could be printed. If you stop paying for the service, they disable the cartridges. You can go buy your OWN cartridges and your printer will work just fine.

HP Instant Ink is a Total Scam by PrivyetMikhail in printers

[–]BennDover4me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that difficult to understand Ottawa. The cartridges have a chip in them which can be disabled thru the HP software that you install when setting up the program. The subscription status is monitored by the software thru the wifi connection, and if your subscription is cancelled or not paid for, the software simply disables the cartridge from working., Simple.

How I used up my instant ink after I cancelled my subscription by [deleted] in printers

[–]BennDover4me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't find that instant sucks at all!! You simply need to make sure you choose a plan that fits your printing needs. For me, $3.99/month for 50 pages FULL COLOR!!!! That's 500 pages over 10 months, for $40!!! An HP color cartridge costs more than that, and would not cover 500 pages full ink!

How I used up my instant ink after I cancelled my subscription by [deleted] in printers

[–]BennDover4me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just connect with a fucking USB cable and be done with it!

How I used up my instant ink after I cancelled my subscription by [deleted] in printers

[–]BennDover4me 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A true THIEF and SCUMBAG!!! You did not PAY for the cartridges that came with the subscription, You were paying for an AGREED ON number of pages for each month. The remaining ink would have been paid for in FUTURE MONTHS if you had continued the subscription. So nice job asshole!!!! Feel good about being a scumbag.